ADBE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 28.79% compared to Adobe's net margin of 15.68%. Adobe's return on equity of 50.48% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $483.61, signalling upside risk potential of 26.52%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $352.92 which suggests that it could grow by 28.97%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Adobe, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Adobe.

Adobe has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.456%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.46x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 42.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.43x versus 6.88x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 28.79% compared to Adobe's net margin of 36.86%. Adobe's return on equity of 50.48% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $483.61, signalling upside risk potential of 26.52%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $524.26 which suggests that it could grow by 5.57%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Microsoft.

Adobe has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.46x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 38.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.43x versus 13.74x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 28.79% compared to Adobe's net margin of 21.55%. Adobe's return on equity of 50.48% beat Oracle's return on equity of 85.26%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $483.61, signalling upside risk potential of 26.52%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $221.73 which suggests that it could fall by -5.45%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Oracle.

Adobe has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.493%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $15.9B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.4B. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.46x while Oracle's PE ratio is 54.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.43x versus 11.71x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 28.79% compared to Adobe's net margin of -41.27%. Adobe's return on equity of 50.48% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99%.

Adobe has a consensus price target of $483.61, signalling upside risk potential of 26.52%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $229.51 which suggests that it could grow by 2.69%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Snowflake.

Adobe has a beta of 1.506, which suggesting that the stock is 50.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Adobe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adobe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adobe quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $1B. Adobe's net income of $1.7B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M. Notably, Adobe's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.46x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adobe is 7.43x versus 19.35x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.