XIACY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GDS Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to Xiaomi Corp.'s net margin of 25.24%. Xiaomi Corp.'s return on equity of 19.44% beat GDS Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.95%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GDS Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $49.16 which suggests that it could grow by 20.29%. Given that GDS Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Xiaomi Corp., analysts believe GDS Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Xiaomi Corp..

Xiaomi Corp. has a beta of 0.648, which suggesting that the stock is 35.228% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GDS Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.342, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.766%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GDS Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings Ltd. pays out 7.03% of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xiaomi Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.8B, which are larger than GDS Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $403.4M. Xiaomi Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than GDS Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $101.8M. Notably, Xiaomi Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while GDS Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 71.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi Corp. is 1.91x versus 5.57x for GDS Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

9F, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to Xiaomi Corp.'s net margin of --. Xiaomi Corp.'s return on equity of 19.44% beat 9F, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.22%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 9F, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2990.12%. Given that 9F, Inc. has higher upside potential than Xiaomi Corp., analysts believe 9F, Inc. is more attractive than Xiaomi Corp..

Xiaomi Corp. has a beta of 0.648, which suggesting that the stock is 35.228% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F, Inc. has a beta of 1.217, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.725%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 9F, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.8B, which are larger than 9F, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than 9F, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while 9F, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi Corp. is 1.91x versus 1.21x for 9F, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to Xiaomi Corp.'s net margin of 14.21%. Xiaomi Corp.'s return on equity of 19.44% beat Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.25%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xiaomi Corp. has higher upside potential than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., analysts believe Xiaomi Corp. is more attractive than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..

Xiaomi Corp. has a beta of 0.648, which suggesting that the stock is 35.228% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.091%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Xiaomi Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xiaomi Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.8B, which are smaller than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $62.1B. Xiaomi Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is lower than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s net income of $8.8B. Notably, Xiaomi Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi Corp. is 1.91x versus 1.95x for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to Xiaomi Corp.'s net margin of -10.66%. Xiaomi Corp.'s return on equity of 19.44% beat VNET Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.45%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNET Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.98 which suggests that it could grow by 47.99%. Given that VNET Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Xiaomi Corp., analysts believe VNET Group, Inc. is more attractive than Xiaomi Corp..

Xiaomi Corp. has a beta of 0.648, which suggesting that the stock is 35.228% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group, Inc. has a beta of -0.017, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.696%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.8B, which are larger than VNET Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $360.7M. Xiaomi Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than VNET Group, Inc.'s net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Xiaomi Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while VNET Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 430.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi Corp. is 1.91x versus 2.06x for VNET Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.