XIACY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GDS Holdings has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -6.49%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat GDS Holdings's return on equity of 15.3%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GDS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $43.15 which suggests that it could grow by 84.33%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.234, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.645%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GDS Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than GDS Holdings quarterly revenues of $374M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than GDS Holdings's net income of $582.2M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while GDS Holdings's PE ratio is 9.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.51x versus 2.79x for GDS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -8.82%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -29.94%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $17.23 which suggests that it could grow by 37.37%. Given that Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Kingsoft Cloud Holdings is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of $310.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$27.4M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.51x versus 2.82x for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of -0.49%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 2.74%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.91 which suggests that it could grow by 179.02%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.147, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.27%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $312.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.51x versus 1.25x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full Truck Alliance has a net margin of 5.79% compared to Xiaomi's net margin of 17.59%. Xiaomi's return on equity of 10.33% beat Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.41%.

Xiaomi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Full Truck Alliance has an analysts' consensus of $15.84 which suggests that it could grow by 42.96%. Given that Full Truck Alliance has higher upside potential than Xiaomi, analysts believe Full Truck Alliance is more attractive than Xiaomi.

Xiaomi has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xiaomi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Full Truck Alliance offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Xiaomi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance pays out 34.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xiaomi quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues of $441.2M. Xiaomi's net income of $747.5M is higher than Full Truck Alliance's net income of $77.6M. Notably, Xiaomi's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.65x while Full Truck Alliance's PE ratio is 26.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi is 3.51x versus 7.39x for Full Truck Alliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.