XIACY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GDS Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to Xiaomi Corp.'s net margin of 25.24%. Xiaomi Corp.'s return on equity of 19.44% beat GDS Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.95%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GDS Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $52.70 which suggests that it could grow by 26.1%. Given that GDS Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Xiaomi Corp., analysts believe GDS Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Xiaomi Corp..

Xiaomi Corp. has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GDS Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.368, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.202%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GDS Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings Ltd. pays out 7.03% of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xiaomi Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.8B, which are larger than GDS Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $403.4M. Xiaomi Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than GDS Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $101.8M. Notably, Xiaomi Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.17x while GDS Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 73.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi Corp. is 1.89x versus 5.69x for GDS Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to Xiaomi Corp.'s net margin of 20.93%. Xiaomi Corp.'s return on equity of 19.44% beat Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.99%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xiaomi Corp. has higher upside potential than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., analysts believe Xiaomi Corp. is more attractive than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..

Xiaomi Corp. has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.418, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.23%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Xiaomi Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. pays out 25.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xiaomi Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.8B, which are smaller than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $64.8B. Xiaomi Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is lower than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s net income of $13.6B. Notably, Xiaomi Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.17x while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi Corp. is 1.89x versus 1.86x for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TravelSky Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to Xiaomi Corp.'s net margin of --. Xiaomi Corp.'s return on equity of 19.44% beat TravelSky Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.47%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TravelSky Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xiaomi Corp. has higher upside potential than TravelSky Technology Ltd., analysts believe Xiaomi Corp. is more attractive than TravelSky Technology Ltd..

Xiaomi Corp. has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TravelSky Technology Ltd. has a beta of -0.113, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.311%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TravelSky Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Xiaomi Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TravelSky Technology Ltd. pays out 33.96% of its earnings as a dividend. TravelSky Technology Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xiaomi Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.8B, which are larger than TravelSky Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Xiaomi Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than TravelSky Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Xiaomi Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.17x while TravelSky Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi Corp. is 1.89x versus 3.38x for TravelSky Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group, Inc. has a net margin of 10.84% compared to Xiaomi Corp.'s net margin of -10.66%. Xiaomi Corp.'s return on equity of 19.44% beat VNET Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.45%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNET Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.31 which suggests that it could grow by 34.38%. Given that VNET Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Xiaomi Corp., analysts believe VNET Group, Inc. is more attractive than Xiaomi Corp..

Xiaomi Corp. has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.75% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.005, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.462%.

Xiaomi Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xiaomi Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xiaomi Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.8B, which are larger than VNET Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $360.7M. Xiaomi Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than VNET Group, Inc.'s net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Xiaomi Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.17x while VNET Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 430.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xiaomi Corp. is 1.89x versus 2.32x for VNET Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.