GDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of --. GDS Holdings's return on equity of -17.84% beat Jianzhi Education Technology Group's return on equity of -252.25%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.27, signalling upside risk potential of 25.83%. On the other hand Jianzhi Education Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Jianzhi Education Technology Group, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Jianzhi Education Technology Group.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.184, which suggesting that the stock is 81.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jianzhi Education Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jianzhi Education Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays -1.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Jianzhi Education Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $414.2M, which are larger than Jianzhi Education Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. GDS Holdings's net income of -$26.9M is higher than Jianzhi Education Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jianzhi Education Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 2.38x versus 0.35x for Jianzhi Education Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of -56.06%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of -17.84% beat Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's return on equity of -27.92%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.27, signalling upside risk potential of 25.83%. On the other hand Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.89 which suggests that it could fall by -27.97%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.184, which suggesting that the stock is 81.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsoft Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays -1.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsoft Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $414.2M, which are larger than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of $263.4M. GDS Holdings's net income of -$26.9M is higher than Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's net income of -$147.6M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kingsoft Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 2.38x versus 2.28x for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of 14.98%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of -17.84% beat VNET Group's return on equity of -33.59%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.27, signalling upside risk potential of 25.83%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 58.07%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than GDS Holdings, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than GDS Holdings.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.184, which suggesting that the stock is 81.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of -0.192, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.173%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GDS Holdings pays -1.26% of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $414.2M, which are larger than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $296.2M. GDS Holdings's net income of -$26.9M is lower than VNET Group's net income of $44.4M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 2.38x versus 0.79x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full Truck Alliance has a net margin of -6.49% compared to GDS Holdings's net margin of 36.52%. GDS Holdings's return on equity of -17.84% beat Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 8.59%.

GDS Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.27, signalling upside risk potential of 25.83%. On the other hand Full Truck Alliance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that GDS Holdings has higher upside potential than Full Truck Alliance, analysts believe GDS Holdings is more attractive than Full Truck Alliance.

GDS Holdings has a beta of 0.184, which suggesting that the stock is 81.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GDS Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Full Truck Alliance offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. GDS Holdings pays -1.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Full Truck Alliance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GDS Holdings quarterly revenues are $414.2M, which are smaller than Full Truck Alliance quarterly revenues of $423.4M. GDS Holdings's net income of -$26.9M is lower than Full Truck Alliance's net income of $154.6M. Notably, GDS Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Full Truck Alliance's PE ratio is 29.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GDS Holdings is 2.38x versus 8.12x for Full Truck Alliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.