WRDLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atos SE has a net margin of -- compared to Worldline SA's net margin of --. Worldline SA's return on equity of -59.33% beat Atos SE's return on equity of -1031.02%.

Worldline SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atos SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Worldline SA has higher upside potential than Atos SE, analysts believe Worldline SA is more attractive than Atos SE.

Worldline SA has a beta of 1.252, which suggesting that the stock is 25.151% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atos SE has a beta of -10.014, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1101.405%.

Worldline SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atos SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $208,800.00 per share. Worldline SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atos SE pays out -0.93% of its earnings as a dividend.

Worldline SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Atos SE quarterly revenues of --. Worldline SA's net income of -- is lower than Atos SE's net income of --. Notably, Worldline SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Atos SE's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worldline SA is 0.09x versus 0.00x for Atos SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Capgemini SE has a net margin of -- compared to Worldline SA's net margin of --. Worldline SA's return on equity of -59.33% beat Capgemini SE's return on equity of 13.95%.

Worldline SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capgemini SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Worldline SA has higher upside potential than Capgemini SE, analysts believe Worldline SA is more attractive than Capgemini SE.

Worldline SA has a beta of 1.252, which suggesting that the stock is 25.151% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capgemini SE has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.636%.

Worldline SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capgemini SE offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Worldline SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capgemini SE pays out 24.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Capgemini SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worldline SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Capgemini SE quarterly revenues of --. Worldline SA's net income of -- is lower than Capgemini SE's net income of --. Notably, Worldline SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capgemini SE's PE ratio is 17.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worldline SA is 0.09x versus 1.25x for Capgemini SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AMTD Digital, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Worldline SA's net margin of --. Worldline SA's return on equity of -59.33% beat AMTD Digital, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Worldline SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AMTD Digital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Worldline SA has higher upside potential than AMTD Digital, Inc., analysts believe Worldline SA is more attractive than AMTD Digital, Inc..

Worldline SA has a beta of 1.252, which suggesting that the stock is 25.151% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMTD Digital, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Worldline SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMTD Digital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worldline SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMTD Digital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worldline SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AMTD Digital, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Worldline SA's net income of -- is lower than AMTD Digital, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Worldline SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AMTD Digital, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worldline SA is 0.09x versus 11.12x for AMTD Digital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sequans Communications SA has a net margin of -- compared to Worldline SA's net margin of -155.05%. Worldline SA's return on equity of -59.33% beat Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of -29.99%.

Worldline SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sequans Communications SA has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 300%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than Worldline SA, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than Worldline SA.

Worldline SA has a beta of 1.252, which suggesting that the stock is 25.151% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.262, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.832%.

Worldline SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sequans Communications SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worldline SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sequans Communications SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worldline SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Worldline SA's net income of -- is lower than Sequans Communications SA's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Worldline SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sequans Communications SA's PE ratio is 5.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worldline SA is 0.09x versus 0.52x for Sequans Communications SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.