UNVGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

America Movil SAB de CV has a net margin of -- compared to Universal Music Group NV's net margin of 8.32%. Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 60.66% beat America Movil SAB de CV's return on equity of 20.05%.

Universal Music Group NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand America Movil SAB de CV has an analysts' consensus of $23.48 which suggests that it could fall by -2.43%. Given that America Movil SAB de CV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe America Movil SAB de CV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison America Movil SAB de CV has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.85900000000001%.

Universal Music Group NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. America Movil SAB de CV offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Universal Music Group NV pays 29.31% of its earnings as a dividend. America Movil SAB de CV pays out 138.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but America Movil SAB de CV's is not.

Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than America Movil SAB de CV quarterly revenues of $13.4B. Universal Music Group NV's net income of -- is lower than America Movil SAB de CV's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Universal Music Group NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.89x while America Movil SAB de CV's PE ratio is 16.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Music Group NV is 3.23x versus 1.48x for America Movil SAB de CV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ATN International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Universal Music Group NV's net margin of 2.15%. Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 60.66% beat ATN International, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.9%.

Universal Music Group NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ATN International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.19%. Given that ATN International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe ATN International, Inc. is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ATN International, Inc. has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.232%.

Universal Music Group NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. ATN International, Inc. offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Universal Music Group NV pays 29.31% of its earnings as a dividend. ATN International, Inc. pays out 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ATN International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $183.2M. Universal Music Group NV's net income of -- is lower than ATN International, Inc.'s net income of $3.9M. Notably, Universal Music Group NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.89x while ATN International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Music Group NV is 3.23x versus 0.59x for ATN International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal KPN NV has a net margin of -- compared to Universal Music Group NV's net margin of 14.29%. Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 60.66% beat Royal KPN NV's return on equity of 24.39%.

Universal Music Group NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Royal KPN NV has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could fall by -17.39%. Given that Royal KPN NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe Royal KPN NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal KPN NV has a beta of 0.297, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.316%.

Universal Music Group NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Royal KPN NV offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Universal Music Group NV pays 29.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal KPN NV pays out 67.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Royal KPN NV quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Universal Music Group NV's net income of -- is lower than Royal KPN NV's net income of $235.9M. Notably, Universal Music Group NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.89x while Royal KPN NV's PE ratio is 50.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Music Group NV is 3.23x versus 3.21x for Royal KPN NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nebius Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Universal Music Group NV's net margin of -109.62%. Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 60.66% beat Nebius Group NV's return on equity of 0.5%.

Universal Music Group NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nebius Group NV has an analysts' consensus of $145.55 which suggests that it could grow by 48.64%. Given that Nebius Group NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe Nebius Group NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nebius Group NV has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.828%.

Universal Music Group NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Nebius Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Music Group NV pays 29.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Nebius Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nebius Group NV quarterly revenues of $227.7M. Universal Music Group NV's net income of -- is lower than Nebius Group NV's net income of -$249.6M. Notably, Universal Music Group NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.89x while Nebius Group NV's PE ratio is 81.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Music Group NV is 3.23x versus 41.79x for Nebius Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.