KKPNY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

America Movil SAB de CV has a net margin of 14.29% compared to Royal KPN NV's net margin of 8.32%. Royal KPN NV's return on equity of 24.39% beat America Movil SAB de CV's return on equity of 20.05%.

Royal KPN NV has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling downside risk potential of -17.39%. On the other hand America Movil SAB de CV has an analysts' consensus of $23.48 which suggests that it could fall by -2.43%. Given that Royal KPN NV has more downside risk than America Movil SAB de CV, analysts believe America Movil SAB de CV is more attractive than Royal KPN NV.

Royal KPN NV has a beta of 0.297, which suggesting that the stock is 70.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison America Movil SAB de CV has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.85900000000001%.

Royal KPN NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. America Movil SAB de CV offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Royal KPN NV pays 67.47% of its earnings as a dividend. America Movil SAB de CV pays out 138.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal KPN NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but America Movil SAB de CV's is not.

Royal KPN NV quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than America Movil SAB de CV quarterly revenues of $13.4B. Royal KPN NV's net income of $235.9M is lower than America Movil SAB de CV's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Royal KPN NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.95x while America Movil SAB de CV's PE ratio is 16.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal KPN NV is 3.21x versus 1.48x for America Movil SAB de CV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ATN International, Inc. has a net margin of 14.29% compared to Royal KPN NV's net margin of 2.15%. Royal KPN NV's return on equity of 24.39% beat ATN International, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.9%.

Royal KPN NV has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling downside risk potential of -17.39%. On the other hand ATN International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.19%. Given that ATN International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Royal KPN NV, analysts believe ATN International, Inc. is more attractive than Royal KPN NV.

Royal KPN NV has a beta of 0.297, which suggesting that the stock is 70.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ATN International, Inc. has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.232%.

Royal KPN NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. ATN International, Inc. offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Royal KPN NV pays 67.47% of its earnings as a dividend. ATN International, Inc. pays out 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal KPN NV quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than ATN International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $183.2M. Royal KPN NV's net income of $235.9M is higher than ATN International, Inc.'s net income of $3.9M. Notably, Royal KPN NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.95x while ATN International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal KPN NV is 3.21x versus 0.59x for ATN International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nebius Group NV has a net margin of 14.29% compared to Royal KPN NV's net margin of -109.62%. Royal KPN NV's return on equity of 24.39% beat Nebius Group NV's return on equity of 0.5%.

Royal KPN NV has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling downside risk potential of -17.39%. On the other hand Nebius Group NV has an analysts' consensus of $145.55 which suggests that it could grow by 48.64%. Given that Nebius Group NV has higher upside potential than Royal KPN NV, analysts believe Nebius Group NV is more attractive than Royal KPN NV.

Royal KPN NV has a beta of 0.297, which suggesting that the stock is 70.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nebius Group NV has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.828%.

Royal KPN NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Nebius Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal KPN NV pays 67.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Nebius Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal KPN NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal KPN NV quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Nebius Group NV quarterly revenues of $227.7M. Royal KPN NV's net income of $235.9M is higher than Nebius Group NV's net income of -$249.6M. Notably, Royal KPN NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.95x while Nebius Group NV's PE ratio is 81.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal KPN NV is 3.21x versus 41.79x for Nebius Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Music Group NV has a net margin of 14.29% compared to Royal KPN NV's net margin of --. Royal KPN NV's return on equity of 24.39% beat Universal Music Group NV's return on equity of 60.66%.

Royal KPN NV has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling downside risk potential of -17.39%. On the other hand Universal Music Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal KPN NV has higher upside potential than Universal Music Group NV, analysts believe Royal KPN NV is more attractive than Universal Music Group NV.

Royal KPN NV has a beta of 0.297, which suggesting that the stock is 70.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Music Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Royal KPN NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Universal Music Group NV offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Royal KPN NV pays 67.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Music Group NV pays out 29.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal KPN NV quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Universal Music Group NV quarterly revenues of --. Royal KPN NV's net income of $235.9M is higher than Universal Music Group NV's net income of --. Notably, Royal KPN NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.95x while Universal Music Group NV's PE ratio is 16.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal KPN NV is 3.21x versus 3.23x for Universal Music Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.