UCLQF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of 5.25% compared to UltraTech Cement's net margin of 6.57%. UltraTech Cement's return on equity of 11.43% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 10.76%.

UltraTech Cement has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 52.78%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than UltraTech Cement, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than UltraTech Cement.

UltraTech Cement has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.510, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51%.

UltraTech Cement has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UltraTech Cement pays 15.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 22.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UltraTech Cement quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $9.3M. UltraTech Cement's net income of $97.9M is higher than Flexible Solutions International's net income of $611.9K. Notably, UltraTech Cement's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.77x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 10.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UltraTech Cement is 3.55x versus 1.17x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grasim Industries has a net margin of 5.25% compared to UltraTech Cement's net margin of 1.16%. UltraTech Cement's return on equity of 11.43% beat Grasim Industries's return on equity of 3.4%.

UltraTech Cement has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Grasim Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UltraTech Cement has higher upside potential than Grasim Industries, analysts believe UltraTech Cement is more attractive than Grasim Industries.

UltraTech Cement has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grasim Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UltraTech Cement has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Grasim Industries offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. UltraTech Cement pays 15.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Grasim Industries pays out 20.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UltraTech Cement quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Grasim Industries quarterly revenues of $4B. UltraTech Cement's net income of $97.9M is higher than Grasim Industries's net income of $46.5M. Notably, UltraTech Cement's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.77x while Grasim Industries's PE ratio is 24.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UltraTech Cement is 3.55x versus 0.80x for Grasim Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hindalco Industries has a net margin of 5.25% compared to UltraTech Cement's net margin of 6.72%. UltraTech Cement's return on equity of 11.43% beat Hindalco Industries's return on equity of 12.24%.

UltraTech Cement has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hindalco Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UltraTech Cement has higher upside potential than Hindalco Industries, analysts believe UltraTech Cement is more attractive than Hindalco Industries.

UltraTech Cement has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hindalco Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UltraTech Cement has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Hindalco Industries offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. UltraTech Cement pays 15.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Hindalco Industries pays out 6.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UltraTech Cement quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Hindalco Industries quarterly revenues of $6.9B. UltraTech Cement's net income of $97.9M is lower than Hindalco Industries's net income of $466.6M. Notably, UltraTech Cement's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.77x while Hindalco Industries's PE ratio is 4.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UltraTech Cement is 3.55x versus 0.25x for Hindalco Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tata Steel has a net margin of 5.25% compared to UltraTech Cement's net margin of 1.56%. UltraTech Cement's return on equity of 11.43% beat Tata Steel's return on equity of 2.96%.

UltraTech Cement has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tata Steel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UltraTech Cement has higher upside potential than Tata Steel, analysts believe UltraTech Cement is more attractive than Tata Steel.

UltraTech Cement has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tata Steel has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UltraTech Cement has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Tata Steel offers a yield of 4.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. UltraTech Cement pays 15.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Tata Steel pays out -99.81% of its earnings as a dividend. UltraTech Cement's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UltraTech Cement quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Tata Steel quarterly revenues of $6.4B. UltraTech Cement's net income of $97.9M is lower than Tata Steel's net income of $99.5M. Notably, UltraTech Cement's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.77x while Tata Steel's PE ratio is 32.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UltraTech Cement is 3.55x versus 0.43x for Tata Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.