TTCIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nyrstar NV has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Titan Cement International SA's net margin of --. Titan Cement International SA's return on equity of -- beat Nyrstar NV's return on equity of --.

Titan Cement International SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nyrstar NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Titan Cement International SA has higher upside potential than Nyrstar NV, analysts believe Titan Cement International SA is more attractive than Nyrstar NV.

Titan Cement International SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nyrstar NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Titan Cement International SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Nyrstar NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Titan Cement International SA pays 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Nyrstar NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Titan Cement International SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Titan Cement International SA quarterly revenues are $727.6M, which are larger than Nyrstar NV quarterly revenues of --. Titan Cement International SA's net income of $83.5M is higher than Nyrstar NV's net income of --. Notably, Titan Cement International SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nyrstar NV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan Cement International SA is -- versus -- for Nyrstar NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Syensqo SA has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Titan Cement International SA's net margin of -0.06%. Titan Cement International SA's return on equity of -- beat Syensqo SA's return on equity of -1.08%.

Titan Cement International SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Syensqo SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Titan Cement International SA has higher upside potential than Syensqo SA, analysts believe Titan Cement International SA is more attractive than Syensqo SA.

Titan Cement International SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Syensqo SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Titan Cement International SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Syensqo SA offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.76 per share. Titan Cement International SA pays 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Syensqo SA pays out 225.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan Cement International SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Syensqo SA's is not.

Titan Cement International SA quarterly revenues are $727.6M, which are smaller than Syensqo SA quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Titan Cement International SA's net income of $83.5M is higher than Syensqo SA's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Titan Cement International SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Syensqo SA's PE ratio is 464.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan Cement International SA is -- versus 1.48x for Syensqo SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solvay SA has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Titan Cement International SA's net margin of 1.53%. Titan Cement International SA's return on equity of -- beat Solvay SA's return on equity of 50.54%.

Titan Cement International SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solvay SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Titan Cement International SA has higher upside potential than Solvay SA, analysts believe Titan Cement International SA is more attractive than Solvay SA.

Titan Cement International SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solvay SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Titan Cement International SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Solvay SA offers a yield of 8.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Titan Cement International SA pays 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Solvay SA pays out 20.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Titan Cement International SA quarterly revenues are $727.6M, which are smaller than Solvay SA quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Titan Cement International SA's net income of $83.5M is higher than Solvay SA's net income of $20.9M. Notably, Titan Cement International SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solvay SA's PE ratio is 1.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan Cement International SA is -- versus 0.58x for Solvay SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tessenderlo Group NV has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Titan Cement International SA's net margin of --. Titan Cement International SA's return on equity of -- beat Tessenderlo Group NV's return on equity of 4.54%.

Titan Cement International SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tessenderlo Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Titan Cement International SA has higher upside potential than Tessenderlo Group NV, analysts believe Titan Cement International SA is more attractive than Tessenderlo Group NV.

Titan Cement International SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tessenderlo Group NV has a beta of 0.014, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.602%.

Titan Cement International SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Tessenderlo Group NV offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Titan Cement International SA pays 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Tessenderlo Group NV pays out 36.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Titan Cement International SA quarterly revenues are $727.6M, which are larger than Tessenderlo Group NV quarterly revenues of --. Titan Cement International SA's net income of $83.5M is higher than Tessenderlo Group NV's net income of --. Notably, Titan Cement International SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tessenderlo Group NV's PE ratio is 17.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan Cement International SA is -- versus 0.58x for Tessenderlo Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.