Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
27
TSRYY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.91
Seasonality move
:
2.79%
Day range:
$6.89 - $7.08
52-week range:
$6.64 - $8.86
Dividend yield:
3.49%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
1.38x
P/B ratio:
1.95x
Volume:
352.8K
Avg. volume:
192.4K
1-year change:
-0.66%
Market cap:
$5B
Revenue:
$1.6B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSIIF
Top Shelf International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates
|
$6.91 | -- | $5B | -- | $0.13 | 3.49% | 1.38x |
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
|
$1.26 | -- | $29.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group
|
$2.42 | -- | $4.3B | 12.94x | $0.05 | 5.95% | 0.54x |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group
|
$1.03 | -- | $8.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling
|
$0.77 | -- | $81M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.31x |
|
TSIIF
Top Shelf International Holdings
|
$0.04 | -- | $7.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.26x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates
|
-- | 1.443 | -- | -- |
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group
|
36.4% | -0.057 | 24.02% | 0.19x |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 0.46x |
|
TSIIF
Top Shelf International Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group
|
-- | -- | 6.91% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling
|
-- | -- | -4.33% | -4.33% | -- | -- |
|
TSIIF
Top Shelf International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Treasury Wine Estates vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRYY or COOT?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Treasury Wine Estates's net margin of --. Treasury Wine Estates's return on equity of -- beat Australian Oilseeds Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates-- -- -- COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSRYY or COOT?
Treasury Wine Estates has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Australian Oilseeds Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Treasury Wine Estates has higher upside potential than Australian Oilseeds Holdings, analysts believe Treasury Wine Estates is more attractive than Australian Oilseeds Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates0 0 0 COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings0 0 0 -
Is TSRYY or COOT More Risky?
Treasury Wine Estates has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRYY or COOT?
Treasury Wine Estates has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Australian Oilseeds Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Treasury Wine Estates pays 96.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Australian Oilseeds Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Treasury Wine Estates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRYY or COOT?
Treasury Wine Estates quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Australian Oilseeds Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Treasury Wine Estates's net income of -- is lower than Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Treasury Wine Estates's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Australian Oilseeds Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Treasury Wine Estates is 1.38x versus -- for Australian Oilseeds Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates1.38x -- -- -- COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRYY or EDVGF?
Endeavour Group has a net margin of -- compared to Treasury Wine Estates's net margin of --. Treasury Wine Estates's return on equity of -- beat Endeavour Group's return on equity of 13.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates-- -- -- EDVGFEndeavour Group-- -- $4B -
What do Analysts Say About TSRYY or EDVGF?
Treasury Wine Estates has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Endeavour Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Treasury Wine Estates has higher upside potential than Endeavour Group, analysts believe Treasury Wine Estates is more attractive than Endeavour Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates0 0 0 EDVGFEndeavour Group0 0 0 -
Is TSRYY or EDVGF More Risky?
Treasury Wine Estates has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endeavour Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRYY or EDVGF?
Treasury Wine Estates has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Endeavour Group offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Treasury Wine Estates pays 96.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Group pays out 76.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRYY or EDVGF?
Treasury Wine Estates quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Endeavour Group quarterly revenues of --. Treasury Wine Estates's net income of -- is lower than Endeavour Group's net income of --. Notably, Treasury Wine Estates's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Endeavour Group's PE ratio is 12.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Treasury Wine Estates is 1.38x versus 0.54x for Endeavour Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates1.38x -- -- -- EDVGFEndeavour Group0.54x 12.94x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRYY or IBG?
Innovation Beverage Group has a net margin of -- compared to Treasury Wine Estates's net margin of --. Treasury Wine Estates's return on equity of -- beat Innovation Beverage Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates-- -- -- IBGInnovation Beverage Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSRYY or IBG?
Treasury Wine Estates has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innovation Beverage Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 288.35%. Given that Innovation Beverage Group has higher upside potential than Treasury Wine Estates, analysts believe Innovation Beverage Group is more attractive than Treasury Wine Estates.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates0 0 0 IBGInnovation Beverage Group0 0 0 -
Is TSRYY or IBG More Risky?
Treasury Wine Estates has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovation Beverage Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRYY or IBG?
Treasury Wine Estates has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Innovation Beverage Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Treasury Wine Estates pays 96.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovation Beverage Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Treasury Wine Estates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRYY or IBG?
Treasury Wine Estates quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Innovation Beverage Group quarterly revenues of --. Treasury Wine Estates's net income of -- is lower than Innovation Beverage Group's net income of --. Notably, Treasury Wine Estates's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innovation Beverage Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Treasury Wine Estates is 1.38x versus -- for Innovation Beverage Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates1.38x -- -- -- IBGInnovation Beverage Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRYY or LRKKF?
Lark Distilling has a net margin of -- compared to Treasury Wine Estates's net margin of --. Treasury Wine Estates's return on equity of -- beat Lark Distilling's return on equity of -4.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates-- -- -- LRKKFLark Distilling-- -- $67.8M -
What do Analysts Say About TSRYY or LRKKF?
Treasury Wine Estates has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lark Distilling has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Treasury Wine Estates has higher upside potential than Lark Distilling, analysts believe Treasury Wine Estates is more attractive than Lark Distilling.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates0 0 0 LRKKFLark Distilling0 0 0 -
Is TSRYY or LRKKF More Risky?
Treasury Wine Estates has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lark Distilling has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRYY or LRKKF?
Treasury Wine Estates has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Lark Distilling offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Treasury Wine Estates pays 96.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Lark Distilling pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Treasury Wine Estates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRYY or LRKKF?
Treasury Wine Estates quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lark Distilling quarterly revenues of --. Treasury Wine Estates's net income of -- is lower than Lark Distilling's net income of --. Notably, Treasury Wine Estates's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lark Distilling's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Treasury Wine Estates is 1.38x versus 5.31x for Lark Distilling. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates1.38x -- -- -- LRKKFLark Distilling5.31x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRYY or TSIIF?
Top Shelf International Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Treasury Wine Estates's net margin of --. Treasury Wine Estates's return on equity of -- beat Top Shelf International Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates-- -- -- TSIIFTop Shelf International Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSRYY or TSIIF?
Treasury Wine Estates has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Shelf International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Treasury Wine Estates has higher upside potential than Top Shelf International Holdings, analysts believe Treasury Wine Estates is more attractive than Top Shelf International Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates0 0 0 TSIIFTop Shelf International Holdings0 0 0 -
Is TSRYY or TSIIF More Risky?
Treasury Wine Estates has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Shelf International Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRYY or TSIIF?
Treasury Wine Estates has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Top Shelf International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Treasury Wine Estates pays 96.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Top Shelf International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Treasury Wine Estates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRYY or TSIIF?
Treasury Wine Estates quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Shelf International Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Treasury Wine Estates's net income of -- is lower than Top Shelf International Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Treasury Wine Estates's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Top Shelf International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Treasury Wine Estates is 1.38x versus 0.26x for Top Shelf International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates1.38x -- -- -- TSIIFTop Shelf International Holdings0.26x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
