Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
39
COOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.61
Seasonality move
:
-46.03%
Day range:
$0.57 - $0.63
52-week range:
$0.41 - $4.50
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
32.49x
P/S ratio:
0.56x
P/B ratio:
8.67x
Volume:
85K
Avg. volume:
745.9K
1-year change:
-51.43%
Market cap:
$18M
Revenue:
$27M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.71
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AUVGF
Australian Vintage Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.62 | -- | $18M | 32.49x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.56x |
|
AUVGF
Australian Vintage Ltd.
|
$0.07 | -- | $23.9M | 25.00x | $0.00 | 14.69% | 0.15x |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)
|
$2.45 | -- | $4.4B | 18.09x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.56x |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group Ltd.
|
$1.15 | -- | $834.8K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling Co. Ltd.
|
$0.5307 | -- | $56.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.78x |
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.
|
$2.57 | -- | $2B | 9.91x | $0.13 | 10.27% | 1.16x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.
|
114.17% | 3.117 | 44.48% | 0.35x |
|
AUVGF
Australian Vintage Ltd.
|
39.86% | 0.000 | -- | 1.03x |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)
|
58.12% | 0.274 | -- | 0.23x |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group Ltd.
|
-- | 4.686 | -- | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling Co. Ltd.
|
1.52% | -2,316.246 | -- | 3.48x |
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.
|
-- | 0.921 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.
|
$354.8K | -$83.4K | -126.85% | -1590.9% | -2.82% | $348.2K |
|
AUVGF
Australian Vintage Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -27.05% | -40.24% | -- | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)
|
-- | -- | 5.47% | 11.81% | -- | -- |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -4.87% | -4.89% | -- | -- |
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or AUVGF?
Australian Vintage Ltd. has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -1590.9% beat Australian Vintage Ltd.'s return on equity of -40.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.6% -$0.02 $13.1M AUVGFAustralian Vintage Ltd.-- -- $213.6M -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or AUVGF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Australian Vintage Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Australian Vintage Ltd., analysts believe Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Australian Vintage Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 AUVGFAustralian Vintage Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COOT or AUVGF More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Australian Vintage Ltd. has a beta of 0.055, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.497%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or AUVGF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Australian Vintage Ltd. offers a yield of 14.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Australian Vintage Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or AUVGF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Australian Vintage Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$351.1K is higher than Australian Vintage Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Australian Vintage Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. is 0.56x versus 0.15x for Australian Vintage Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0.56x 32.49x $5.9M -$351.1K AUVGFAustralian Vintage Ltd.0.15x 25.00x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or EDVGF?
Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia) has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -1590.9% beat Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)'s return on equity of 11.81%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.6% -$0.02 $13.1M EDVGFEndeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)-- -- $5.8B -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or EDVGF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia), analysts believe Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 EDVGFEndeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)0 0 0 -
Is COOT or EDVGF More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia) has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or EDVGF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia) pays out 105.59% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or EDVGF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia) quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$351.1K is higher than Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)'s net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)'s PE ratio is 18.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. is 0.56x versus 0.56x for Endeavour Group Ltd. (Australia). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0.56x 32.49x $5.9M -$351.1K EDVGFEndeavour Group Ltd. (Australia)0.56x 18.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or IBG?
Innovation Beverage Group Ltd. has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -1590.9% beat Innovation Beverage Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.6% -$0.02 $13.1M IBGInnovation Beverage Group Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or IBG?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innovation Beverage Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8595.65%. Given that Innovation Beverage Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Innovation Beverage Group Ltd. is more attractive than Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 IBGInnovation Beverage Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COOT or IBG More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovation Beverage Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or IBG?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innovation Beverage Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovation Beverage Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or IBG?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Innovation Beverage Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$351.1K is higher than Innovation Beverage Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Innovation Beverage Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. is 0.56x versus -- for Innovation Beverage Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0.56x 32.49x $5.9M -$351.1K IBGInnovation Beverage Group Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or LRKKF?
Lark Distilling Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -1590.9% beat Lark Distilling Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -4.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.6% -$0.02 $13.1M LRKKFLark Distilling Co. Ltd.-- -- $78.7M -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or LRKKF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lark Distilling Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lark Distilling Co. Ltd., analysts believe Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Lark Distilling Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 LRKKFLark Distilling Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COOT or LRKKF More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lark Distilling Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or LRKKF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lark Distilling Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lark Distilling Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or LRKKF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Lark Distilling Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$351.1K is higher than Lark Distilling Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Lark Distilling Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. is 0.56x versus 4.78x for Lark Distilling Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0.56x 32.49x $5.9M -$351.1K LRKKFLark Distilling Co. Ltd.4.78x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or TSRYY?
Treasury Wine Estates Ltd. has a net margin of -5.94% compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -1590.9% beat Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.6% -$0.02 $13.1M TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or TSRYY?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Treasury Wine Estates Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Treasury Wine Estates Ltd., analysts believe Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Treasury Wine Estates Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is COOT or TSRYY More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Treasury Wine Estates Ltd. has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.228%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or TSRYY?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Treasury Wine Estates Ltd. offers a yield of 10.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Treasury Wine Estates Ltd. pays out 62.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or TSRYY?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Treasury Wine Estates Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$351.1K is higher than Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd. is 0.56x versus 1.16x for Treasury Wine Estates Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd.0.56x 32.49x $5.9M -$351.1K TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates Ltd.1.16x 9.91x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
