3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Buy
68
COOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.29
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$1.26 - $1.35
52-week range:
$0.61 - $3.52
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
7.25x
Volume:
34K
Avg. volume:
35.2K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$30.2M
Revenue:
$22.1M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSIIF
Top Shelf International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
|
$1.30 | -- | $30.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group
|
$2.42 | -- | $4.3B | 12.94x | $0.05 | 5.95% | 0.54x |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group
|
$1.09 | -- | $9.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling
|
$0.77 | -- | $81M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.31x |
|
TSIIF
Top Shelf International Holdings
|
$0.04 | -- | $7.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.26x |
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates
|
$6.92 | -- | $5B | -- | $0.13 | 3.49% | 1.38x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group
|
36.4% | -0.057 | 24.02% | 0.19x |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 0.46x |
|
TSIIF
Top Shelf International Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates
|
-- | 1.443 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDVGF
Endeavour Group
|
-- | -- | 6.91% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
|
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LRKKF
Lark Distilling
|
-- | -- | -4.33% | -4.33% | -- | -- |
|
TSIIF
Top Shelf International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRYY
Treasury Wine Estates
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Australian Oilseeds Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or EDVGF?
Endeavour Group has a net margin of -- compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Endeavour Group's return on equity of 13.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- EDVGFEndeavour Group-- -- $4B -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or EDVGF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Endeavour Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Oilseeds Holdings has higher upside potential than Endeavour Group, analysts believe Australian Oilseeds Holdings is more attractive than Endeavour Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings0 0 0 EDVGFEndeavour Group0 0 0 -
Is COOT or EDVGF More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endeavour Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or EDVGF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Endeavour Group offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Group pays out 76.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or EDVGF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Endeavour Group quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Endeavour Group's net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Endeavour Group's PE ratio is 12.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings is -- versus 0.54x for Endeavour Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- -- EDVGFEndeavour Group0.54x 12.94x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or IBG?
Innovation Beverage Group has a net margin of -- compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Innovation Beverage Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- IBGInnovation Beverage Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or IBG?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innovation Beverage Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 266.97%. Given that Innovation Beverage Group has higher upside potential than Australian Oilseeds Holdings, analysts believe Innovation Beverage Group is more attractive than Australian Oilseeds Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings0 0 0 IBGInnovation Beverage Group0 0 0 -
Is COOT or IBG More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovation Beverage Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or IBG?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innovation Beverage Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovation Beverage Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or IBG?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Innovation Beverage Group quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Innovation Beverage Group's net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innovation Beverage Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings is -- versus -- for Innovation Beverage Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- -- IBGInnovation Beverage Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or LRKKF?
Lark Distilling has a net margin of -- compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Lark Distilling's return on equity of -4.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- LRKKFLark Distilling-- -- $67.8M -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or LRKKF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lark Distilling has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Oilseeds Holdings has higher upside potential than Lark Distilling, analysts believe Australian Oilseeds Holdings is more attractive than Lark Distilling.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings0 0 0 LRKKFLark Distilling0 0 0 -
Is COOT or LRKKF More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lark Distilling has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or LRKKF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lark Distilling offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lark Distilling pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or LRKKF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lark Distilling quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Lark Distilling's net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lark Distilling's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings is -- versus 5.31x for Lark Distilling. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- -- LRKKFLark Distilling5.31x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or TSIIF?
Top Shelf International Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Top Shelf International Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- TSIIFTop Shelf International Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or TSIIF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Shelf International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Oilseeds Holdings has higher upside potential than Top Shelf International Holdings, analysts believe Australian Oilseeds Holdings is more attractive than Top Shelf International Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings0 0 0 TSIIFTop Shelf International Holdings0 0 0 -
Is COOT or TSIIF More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Shelf International Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or TSIIF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Top Shelf International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Top Shelf International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or TSIIF?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Shelf International Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Top Shelf International Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Top Shelf International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings is -- versus 0.26x for Top Shelf International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- -- TSIIFTop Shelf International Holdings0.26x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns COOT or TSRYY?
Treasury Wine Estates has a net margin of -- compared to Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net margin of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Treasury Wine Estates's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About COOT or TSRYY?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Treasury Wine Estates has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Australian Oilseeds Holdings has higher upside potential than Treasury Wine Estates, analysts believe Australian Oilseeds Holdings is more attractive than Treasury Wine Estates.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings0 0 0 TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates0 0 0 -
Is COOT or TSRYY More Risky?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Treasury Wine Estates has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.389%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock COOT or TSRYY?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Treasury Wine Estates offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Australian Oilseeds Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Treasury Wine Estates pays out 96.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Treasury Wine Estates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios COOT or TSRYY?
Australian Oilseeds Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Treasury Wine Estates quarterly revenues of --. Australian Oilseeds Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Treasury Wine Estates's net income of --. Notably, Australian Oilseeds Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Treasury Wine Estates's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Australian Oilseeds Holdings is -- versus 1.38x for Treasury Wine Estates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings-- -- -- -- TSRYYTreasury Wine Estates1.38x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will American Tower Stock Recover?
The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…
Stock Ideas
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 30.64% over the past day.
Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is up 22.41% over the past day.
Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7
Alico [ALCO] is up 18.99% over the past day.
