Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
13
TREAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.64
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$13.64 - $13.64
52-week range:
$13.64 - $13.64
Dividend yield:
3.03%
P/E ratio:
20.90x
P/S ratio:
4.41x
P/B ratio:
3.53x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
$374.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TREAF
Terna Energy SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AHWSF
Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CPYYY
Centrica Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCAEF
Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
$9.6B | $2.23 | 11.71% | -38.62% | $201.94 |
|
PUPOF
Public Power Corp. SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TREAF
Terna Energy SA
|
$13.64 | -- | $1.6B | 20.90x | $0.41 | 3.03% | 4.41x |
|
AHWSF
Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA
|
$8.50 | -- | $905.6M | -- | $0.08 | 0.97% | 2.24x |
|
CPYYY
Centrica Plc
|
$11.82 | -- | $13.8B | 18.24x | $0.10 | 2.12% | 0.56x |
|
HCAEF
Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA
|
$3.10 | -- | $718.5M | 8.96x | $0.14 | 6.88% | 1.42x |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
$152.69 | $201.94 | $33B | 39.38x | $0.48 | 1.16% | 0.99x |
|
PUPOF
Public Power Corp. SA
|
$19.90 | -- | $7.3B | 20.65x | $0.47 | 2.34% | 0.63x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TREAF
Terna Energy SA
|
71.23% | 0.000 | 76.87% | 0.91x |
|
AHWSF
Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA
|
-- | 0.217 | -- | -- |
|
CPYYY
Centrica Plc
|
44.27% | -0.215 | -- | 1.33x |
|
HCAEF
Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA
|
-- | -0.345 | -- | 0.00x |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
90.82% | 3.119 | 53.68% | 1.10x |
|
PUPOF
Public Power Corp. SA
|
64.26% | 0.734 | 137.4% | 0.93x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TREAF
Terna Energy SA
|
-- | -- | 1.89% | 6.42% | -- | -- |
|
AHWSF
Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CPYYY
Centrica Plc
|
-- | -- | -3.37% | -5.51% | -- | -- |
|
HCAEF
Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA
|
-- | -$721.8K | 8.97% | 8.97% | 50.24% | $1.7M |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
$1.1B | $377M | 5.92% | 38.59% | 4.86% | -$170M |
|
PUPOF
Public Power Corp. SA
|
$918.3M | $918.3M | 2.53% | 5.97% | 32.43% | $393.8M |
Terna Energy SA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TREAF or AHWSF?
Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA has a net margin of -- compared to Terna Energy SA's net margin of --. Terna Energy SA's return on equity of 6.42% beat Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TREAFTerna Energy SA-- -- $1.7B AHWSFAthens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TREAF or AHWSF?
Terna Energy SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Terna Energy SA has higher upside potential than Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA, analysts believe Terna Energy SA is more attractive than Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TREAFTerna Energy SA0 0 0 AHWSFAthens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA0 0 0 -
Is TREAF or AHWSF More Risky?
Terna Energy SA has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.943% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA has a beta of -0.055, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.499%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TREAF or AHWSF?
Terna Energy SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Terna Energy SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA pays out 50.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TREAF or AHWSF?
Terna Energy SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA quarterly revenues of --. Terna Energy SA's net income of -- is lower than Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA's net income of --. Notably, Terna Energy SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.90x while Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Terna Energy SA is 4.41x versus 2.24x for Athens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TREAFTerna Energy SA4.41x 20.90x -- -- AHWSFAthens Water Supply & Sewage Co. SA2.24x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TREAF or CPYYY?
Centrica Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Terna Energy SA's net margin of --. Terna Energy SA's return on equity of 6.42% beat Centrica Plc's return on equity of -5.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TREAFTerna Energy SA-- -- $1.7B CPYYYCentrica Plc-- -- $8.7B -
What do Analysts Say About TREAF or CPYYY?
Terna Energy SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Centrica Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Terna Energy SA has higher upside potential than Centrica Plc, analysts believe Terna Energy SA is more attractive than Centrica Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TREAFTerna Energy SA0 0 0 CPYYYCentrica Plc0 0 0 -
Is TREAF or CPYYY More Risky?
Terna Energy SA has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.943% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrica Plc has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.181%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TREAF or CPYYY?
Terna Energy SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Centrica Plc offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Terna Energy SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Centrica Plc pays out 16.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Centrica Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TREAF or CPYYY?
Terna Energy SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Centrica Plc quarterly revenues of --. Terna Energy SA's net income of -- is lower than Centrica Plc's net income of --. Notably, Terna Energy SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.90x while Centrica Plc's PE ratio is 18.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Terna Energy SA is 4.41x versus 0.56x for Centrica Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TREAFTerna Energy SA4.41x 20.90x -- -- CPYYYCentrica Plc0.56x 18.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TREAF or HCAEF?
Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA has a net margin of -- compared to Terna Energy SA's net margin of 35.29%. Terna Energy SA's return on equity of 6.42% beat Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA's return on equity of 8.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TREAFTerna Energy SA-- -- $1.7B HCAEFAdmie Holdings (IPTO) SA99.63% $0.12 $931.9M -
What do Analysts Say About TREAF or HCAEF?
Terna Energy SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Terna Energy SA has higher upside potential than Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA, analysts believe Terna Energy SA is more attractive than Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TREAFTerna Energy SA0 0 0 HCAEFAdmie Holdings (IPTO) SA0 0 0 -
Is TREAF or HCAEF More Risky?
Terna Energy SA has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.943% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA has a beta of -0.024, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.438%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TREAF or HCAEF?
Terna Energy SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA offers a yield of 6.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Terna Energy SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA pays out 37.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TREAF or HCAEF?
Terna Energy SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA quarterly revenues of --. Terna Energy SA's net income of -- is lower than Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA's net income of $27.5M. Notably, Terna Energy SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.90x while Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA's PE ratio is 8.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Terna Energy SA is 4.41x versus 1.42x for Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TREAFTerna Energy SA4.41x 20.90x -- -- HCAEFAdmie Holdings (IPTO) SA1.42x 8.96x -- $27.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns TREAF or NRG?
NRG Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Terna Energy SA's net margin of 0.85%. Terna Energy SA's return on equity of 6.42% beat NRG Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TREAFTerna Energy SA-- -- $1.7B NRGNRG Energy, Inc.14.1% $0.26 $18.3B -
What do Analysts Say About TREAF or NRG?
Terna Energy SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NRG Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $201.94 which suggests that it could grow by 32.26%. Given that NRG Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Terna Energy SA, analysts believe NRG Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Terna Energy SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TREAFTerna Energy SA0 0 0 NRGNRG Energy, Inc.11 2 1 -
Is TREAF or NRG More Risky?
Terna Energy SA has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.943% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.174%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TREAF or NRG?
Terna Energy SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. NRG Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Terna Energy SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc. pays out 43.95% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TREAF or NRG?
Terna Energy SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NRG Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Terna Energy SA's net income of -- is lower than NRG Energy, Inc.'s net income of $66M. Notably, Terna Energy SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.90x while NRG Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Terna Energy SA is 4.41x versus 0.99x for NRG Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TREAFTerna Energy SA4.41x 20.90x -- -- NRGNRG Energy, Inc.0.99x 39.38x $7.8B $66M
-
Which has Higher Returns TREAF or PUPOF?
Public Power Corp. SA has a net margin of -- compared to Terna Energy SA's net margin of -0.85%. Terna Energy SA's return on equity of 6.42% beat Public Power Corp. SA's return on equity of 5.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TREAFTerna Energy SA-- -- $1.7B PUPOFPublic Power Corp. SA32.43% -$0.14 $18.1B -
What do Analysts Say About TREAF or PUPOF?
Terna Energy SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Public Power Corp. SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Terna Energy SA has higher upside potential than Public Power Corp. SA, analysts believe Terna Energy SA is more attractive than Public Power Corp. SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TREAFTerna Energy SA0 0 0 PUPOFPublic Power Corp. SA0 0 0 -
Is TREAF or PUPOF More Risky?
Terna Energy SA has a beta of 0.111, which suggesting that the stock is 88.943% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Public Power Corp. SA has a beta of 0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.78%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TREAF or PUPOF?
Terna Energy SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Public Power Corp. SA offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Terna Energy SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Public Power Corp. SA pays out 92.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Public Power Corp. SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TREAF or PUPOF?
Terna Energy SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Public Power Corp. SA quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Terna Energy SA's net income of -- is lower than Public Power Corp. SA's net income of -$23.9M. Notably, Terna Energy SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.90x while Public Power Corp. SA's PE ratio is 20.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Terna Energy SA is 4.41x versus 0.63x for Public Power Corp. SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TREAFTerna Energy SA4.41x 20.90x -- -- PUPOFPublic Power Corp. SA0.63x 20.65x $2.8B -$23.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
