PUPOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Centrica Plc has a net margin of -0.85% compared to Public Power Corp. SA's net margin of --. Public Power Corp. SA's return on equity of 5.97% beat Centrica Plc's return on equity of -5.51%.

Public Power Corp. SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Centrica Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Public Power Corp. SA has higher upside potential than Centrica Plc, analysts believe Public Power Corp. SA is more attractive than Centrica Plc.

Public Power Corp. SA has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrica Plc has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.181%.

Public Power Corp. SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Centrica Plc offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Public Power Corp. SA pays 92.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Centrica Plc pays out 16.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Public Power Corp. SA quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Centrica Plc quarterly revenues of --. Public Power Corp. SA's net income of -$23.9M is higher than Centrica Plc's net income of --. Notably, Public Power Corp. SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.65x while Centrica Plc's PE ratio is 18.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Public Power Corp. SA is 0.63x versus 0.56x for Centrica Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA has a net margin of -0.85% compared to Public Power Corp. SA's net margin of 35.29%. Public Power Corp. SA's return on equity of 5.97% beat Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA's return on equity of 8.97%.

Public Power Corp. SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Public Power Corp. SA has higher upside potential than Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA, analysts believe Public Power Corp. SA is more attractive than Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA.

Public Power Corp. SA has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA has a beta of -0.024, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.438%.

Public Power Corp. SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA offers a yield of 6.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Public Power Corp. SA pays 92.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA pays out 37.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Public Power Corp. SA quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA quarterly revenues of --. Public Power Corp. SA's net income of -$23.9M is lower than Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA's net income of $27.5M. Notably, Public Power Corp. SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.65x while Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA's PE ratio is 8.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Public Power Corp. SA is 0.63x versus 1.42x for Admie Holdings (IPTO) SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -0.85% compared to Public Power Corp. SA's net margin of 0.85%. Public Power Corp. SA's return on equity of 5.97% beat NRG Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.59%.

Public Power Corp. SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NRG Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $201.94 which suggests that it could grow by 32.26%. Given that NRG Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Public Power Corp. SA, analysts believe NRG Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Public Power Corp. SA.

Public Power Corp. SA has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.174%.

Public Power Corp. SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. NRG Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Public Power Corp. SA pays 92.95% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc. pays out 43.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Public Power Corp. SA quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than NRG Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Public Power Corp. SA's net income of -$23.9M is lower than NRG Energy, Inc.'s net income of $66M. Notably, Public Power Corp. SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.65x while NRG Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Public Power Corp. SA is 0.63x versus 0.99x for NRG Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terna Energy SA has a net margin of -0.85% compared to Public Power Corp. SA's net margin of --. Public Power Corp. SA's return on equity of 5.97% beat Terna Energy SA's return on equity of 6.42%.

Public Power Corp. SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Terna Energy SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Public Power Corp. SA has higher upside potential than Terna Energy SA, analysts believe Public Power Corp. SA is more attractive than Terna Energy SA.

Public Power Corp. SA has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terna Energy SA has a beta of 0.111, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.943%.

Public Power Corp. SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.34%. Terna Energy SA offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Public Power Corp. SA pays 92.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Terna Energy SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Public Power Corp. SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Public Power Corp. SA quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Terna Energy SA quarterly revenues of --. Public Power Corp. SA's net income of -$23.9M is higher than Terna Energy SA's net income of --. Notably, Public Power Corp. SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.65x while Terna Energy SA's PE ratio is 20.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Public Power Corp. SA is 0.63x versus 4.41x for Terna Energy SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.