TOGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of -51.16% compared to TurnOnGreen's net margin of -18.26%. TurnOnGreen's return on equity of -- beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -88.11%.

TurnOnGreen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 311.77%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than TurnOnGreen, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than TurnOnGreen.

TurnOnGreen has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.434% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.678%.

TurnOnGreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TurnOnGreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TurnOnGreen quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $14.5M. TurnOnGreen's net income of -$660K is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, TurnOnGreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TurnOnGreen is 0.42x versus 0.44x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Preformed Line Products has a net margin of -51.16% compared to TurnOnGreen's net margin of 5.23%. TurnOnGreen's return on equity of -- beat Preformed Line Products's return on equity of 7.95%.

TurnOnGreen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Preformed Line Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TurnOnGreen has higher upside potential than Preformed Line Products, analysts believe TurnOnGreen is more attractive than Preformed Line Products.

TurnOnGreen has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.434% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Preformed Line Products has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.356%.

TurnOnGreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Preformed Line Products offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. TurnOnGreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products pays out 6.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Preformed Line Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TurnOnGreen quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Preformed Line Products quarterly revenues of $147M. TurnOnGreen's net income of -$660K is lower than Preformed Line Products's net income of $7.7M. Notably, TurnOnGreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Preformed Line Products's PE ratio is 18.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TurnOnGreen is 0.42x versus 1.08x for Preformed Line Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -51.16% compared to TurnOnGreen's net margin of -121.55%. TurnOnGreen's return on equity of -- beat Plug Power's return on equity of -45.97%.

TurnOnGreen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.01 which suggests that it could grow by 6.68%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than TurnOnGreen, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than TurnOnGreen.

TurnOnGreen has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.434% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 1.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.272%.

TurnOnGreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TurnOnGreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TurnOnGreen quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $173.7M. TurnOnGreen's net income of -$660K is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$211.2M. Notably, TurnOnGreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TurnOnGreen is 0.42x versus 2.75x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of -51.16% compared to TurnOnGreen's net margin of 0.72%. TurnOnGreen's return on equity of -- beat Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98%.

TurnOnGreen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.04%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than TurnOnGreen, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than TurnOnGreen.

TurnOnGreen has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.434% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.274%.

TurnOnGreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TurnOnGreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TurnOnGreen quarterly revenues are $1.3M, which are smaller than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $35.7M. TurnOnGreen's net income of -$660K is lower than Ultralife's net income of $258K. Notably, TurnOnGreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ultralife's PE ratio is 13.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TurnOnGreen is 0.42x versus 0.73x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.