TMRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Resource Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s net margin of -18.92%. Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -172.45% beat Gold Resource Corp.'s return on equity of -125.44%.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Resource Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.25 which suggests that it could grow by 31.19%. Given that Gold Resource Corp. has higher upside potential than Texas Mineral Resources Corp., analysts believe Gold Resource Corp. is more attractive than Texas Mineral Resources Corp..

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Resource Corp. has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.427%.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Resource Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Mineral Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Resource Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Resource Corp. quarterly revenues of $24.6M. Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s net income of -$803.6K is higher than Gold Resource Corp.'s net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Resource Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Mineral Resources Corp. is -- versus 1.88x for Gold Resource Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s net margin of -3965.14%. Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -172.45% beat Ivanhoe Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.68%.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.08 which suggests that it could grow by 19.19%. Given that Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Mineral Resources Corp., analysts believe Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Mineral Resources Corp..

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Mineral Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $545K. Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s net income of -$803.6K is higher than Ivanhoe Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$21.6M. Notably, Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ivanhoe Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Mineral Resources Corp. is -- versus 586.99x for Ivanhoe Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -172.45% beat Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -24.65%.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rare Element Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 262.41%. Given that Rare Element Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Texas Mineral Resources Corp., analysts believe Rare Element Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Texas Mineral Resources Corp..

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.661%.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rare Element Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Mineral Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rare Element Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rare Element Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s net income of -$803.6K is lower than Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Mineral Resources Corp. is -- versus -- for Rare Element Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vista Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -172.45% beat Vista Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -46.02%.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vista Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.54%. Given that Vista Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Texas Mineral Resources Corp., analysts believe Vista Gold Corp. is more attractive than Texas Mineral Resources Corp..

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.39% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vista Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.482%.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vista Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Mineral Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vista Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Texas Mineral Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vista Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s net income of -$803.6K is lower than Vista Gold Corp.'s net income of -$723K. Notably, Texas Mineral Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vista Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Mineral Resources Corp. is -- versus 278.00x for Vista Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.