REEMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 10.78%. Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -19.98% beat Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.86%.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 326.66%. On the other hand Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $67.47 which suggests that it could grow by 19.67%. Given that Rare Element Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., analysts believe Rare Element Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc..

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has a beta of 1.415, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.534%.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Rare Element Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. pays out 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s net income of $565M. Notably, Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rare Element Resources Ltd. is -- versus 3.24x for Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net margin of -4500.45%. Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -19.98% beat Ivanhoe Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -38.5%.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 326.66%. On the other hand Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.08 which suggests that it could grow by 78.96%. Given that Rare Element Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Electric, Inc., analysts believe Rare Element Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Electric, Inc..

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rare Element Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ivanhoe Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $896K. Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$2.4M is higher than Ivanhoe Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ivanhoe Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rare Element Resources Ltd. is -- versus 506.10x for Ivanhoe Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pershing Resources Co., Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -19.98% beat Pershing Resources Co., Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 326.66%. On the other hand Pershing Resources Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rare Element Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pershing Resources Co., Inc., analysts believe Rare Element Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Pershing Resources Co., Inc..

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pershing Resources Co., Inc. has a beta of -0.081, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.056%.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pershing Resources Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rare Element Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pershing Resources Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Pershing Resources Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$2.4M is higher than Pershing Resources Co., Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pershing Resources Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rare Element Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Pershing Resources Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southern Copper Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net margin of 33.89%. Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -19.98% beat Southern Copper Corp.'s return on equity of 43.01%.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 326.66%. On the other hand Southern Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $150.49 which suggests that it could fall by -11.91%. Given that Rare Element Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Southern Copper Corp., analysts believe Rare Element Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Southern Copper Corp..

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southern Copper Corp. has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.891%.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southern Copper Corp. offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Rare Element Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southern Copper Corp. pays out 57.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Southern Copper Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rare Element Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Southern Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$2.4M is lower than Southern Copper Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Rare Element Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Southern Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is 32.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rare Element Resources Ltd. is -- versus 10.54x for Southern Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.