TKHIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Takara Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.47%. Takara Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.71% beat Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.22%.

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Takara Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Takara Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc..

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.258, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.795%.

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Takara Holdings, Inc. pays 37.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc. pays out 78.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Takara Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $632M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Takara Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M is lower than Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $116.5M. Notably, Takara Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.40x while Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 51.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Takara Holdings, Inc. is 0.87x versus 0.54x for Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Takara Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.29%. Takara Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.71% beat Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.86%.

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $16.60 which suggests that it could grow by 8.64%. Given that Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Takara Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Takara Holdings, Inc..

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.062, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.169%.

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Takara Holdings, Inc. pays 37.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 71.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Takara Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $632M, which are smaller than Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Takara Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M is lower than Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of $390.5M. Notably, Takara Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.40x while Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 22.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Takara Holdings, Inc. is 0.87x versus 0.77x for Kirin Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sapporo Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Takara Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.61%. Takara Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.71% beat Sapporo Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.82%.

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sapporo Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Takara Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sapporo Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Takara Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Sapporo Holdings Ltd..

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sapporo Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.094, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.638%.

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Sapporo Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Takara Holdings, Inc. pays 37.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Sapporo Holdings Ltd. pays out 52.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Takara Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $632M, which are smaller than Sapporo Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $935M. Takara Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M is lower than Sapporo Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $61.8M. Notably, Takara Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.40x while Sapporo Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 74.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Takara Holdings, Inc. is 0.87x versus 1.07x for Sapporo Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd. has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Takara Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.44%. Takara Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.71% beat Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.22%.

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Takara Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd., analysts believe Takara Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd..

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd. has a beta of 0.034, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.598%.

Takara Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Takara Holdings, Inc. pays 37.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd. pays out 24.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Takara Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $632M, which are smaller than Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Takara Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M is lower than Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd.'s net income of $270.1M. Notably, Takara Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.40x while Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Takara Holdings, Inc. is 0.87x versus 0.84x for Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.