TGNOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a net margin of -- compared to Trigano SA's net margin of --. Trigano SA's return on equity of 23.13% beat LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's return on equity of 16.36%.

Trigano SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has an analysts' consensus of $147.33 which suggests that it could fall by -1.48%. Given that LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has higher upside potential than Trigano SA, analysts believe LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE is more attractive than Trigano SA.

Trigano SA has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.252% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.496%.

Trigano SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Trigano SA pays -18.05% of its earnings as a dividend. LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE pays out 37.2% of its earnings as a dividend. LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trigano SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE quarterly revenues of --. Trigano SA's net income of -- is lower than LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's net income of --. Notably, Trigano SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.36x while LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's PE ratio is 31.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trigano SA is 0.94x versus 4.15x for LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA has a net margin of -- compared to Trigano SA's net margin of --. Trigano SA's return on equity of 23.13% beat Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA's return on equity of 10.73%.

Trigano SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trigano SA has higher upside potential than Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA, analysts believe Trigano SA is more attractive than Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA.

Trigano SA has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.252% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.687%.

Trigano SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Trigano SA pays -18.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA pays out 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trigano SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA quarterly revenues of $6.9B. Trigano SA's net income of -- is lower than Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA's net income of $6.9B. Notably, Trigano SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.36x while Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA's PE ratio is 13.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trigano SA is 0.94x versus 0.80x for Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kering SA has a net margin of -- compared to Trigano SA's net margin of --. Trigano SA's return on equity of 23.13% beat Kering SA's return on equity of 4.71%.

Trigano SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kering SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trigano SA has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Trigano SA is more attractive than Kering SA.

Trigano SA has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.252% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kering SA has a beta of 1.551, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.063%.

Trigano SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Kering SA offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Trigano SA pays -18.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Kering SA pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Kering SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trigano SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kering SA quarterly revenues of --. Trigano SA's net income of -- is lower than Kering SA's net income of --. Notably, Trigano SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.36x while Kering SA's PE ratio is 55.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trigano SA is 0.94x versus 2.56x for Kering SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valeo SE has a net margin of -- compared to Trigano SA's net margin of --. Trigano SA's return on equity of 23.13% beat Valeo SE's return on equity of 3%.

Trigano SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Valeo SE has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could grow by 8.79%. Given that Valeo SE has higher upside potential than Trigano SA, analysts believe Valeo SE is more attractive than Trigano SA.

Trigano SA has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.252% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valeo SE has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.349%.

Trigano SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Valeo SE offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Trigano SA pays -18.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SE pays out 49.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trigano SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valeo SE quarterly revenues of --. Trigano SA's net income of -- is lower than Valeo SE's net income of --. Notably, Trigano SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.36x while Valeo SE's PE ratio is 24.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trigano SA is 0.94x versus 0.14x for Valeo SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.