PPRUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hermes International SA has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17% beat Hermes International SA's return on equity of 29.01%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hermes International SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kering SA has higher upside potential than Hermes International SA, analysts believe Kering SA is more attractive than Hermes International SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.485, which suggesting that the stock is 48.471% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hermes International SA has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.975%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Hermes International SA offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.43 per share. Kering SA pays 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Hermes International SA pays out 58.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Hermes International SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kering SA's is not.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hermes International SA quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Hermes International SA's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.54x while Hermes International SA's PE ratio is 58.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 1.29x versus 17.67x for Hermes International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17% beat Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's return on equity of 18.98%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has an analysts' consensus of $152.37 which suggests that it could grow by 38.31%. Given that Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE is more attractive than Kering SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.485, which suggesting that the stock is 48.471% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.591%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Kering SA pays 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE pays out 51.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kering SA's is not.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.54x while Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's PE ratio is 20.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 1.29x versus 3.03x for Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Michelin has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17% beat Michelin's return on equity of 10.73%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Michelin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kering SA has higher upside potential than Michelin, analysts believe Kering SA is more attractive than Michelin.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.485, which suggesting that the stock is 48.471% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Michelin has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.617%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Michelin offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Kering SA pays 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Michelin pays out 51.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Michelin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kering SA's is not.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Michelin quarterly revenues of $6.9B. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Michelin's net income of $6.9B. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.54x while Michelin's PE ratio is 12.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 1.29x versus 0.87x for Michelin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valeo SA has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17% beat Valeo SA's return on equity of 3.67%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Valeo SA has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could grow by 51.45%. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than Kering SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.485, which suggesting that the stock is 48.471% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valeo SA has a beta of 1.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.107%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Valeo SA offers a yield of 4.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Kering SA pays 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SA pays out 59.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kering SA's is not.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valeo SA quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Valeo SA's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.54x while Valeo SA's PE ratio is 13.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 1.29x versus 0.10x for Valeo SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.