PPRUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 4.71% beat LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's return on equity of 16.36%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.36%. Given that LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE is more attractive than Kering SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.540, which suggesting that the stock is 53.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a beta of 1.199, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.905%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Kering SA pays 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE pays out 37.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 812.56x while LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's PE ratio is 26.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 2.45x versus 3.57x for LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navya SA has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 4.71% beat Navya SA's return on equity of --.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Navya SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kering SA has higher upside potential than Navya SA, analysts believe Kering SA is more attractive than Navya SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.540, which suggesting that the stock is 53.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navya SA has a beta of 52.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5104.562%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Navya SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kering SA pays 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Navya SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kering SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Navya SA quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Navya SA's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 812.56x while Navya SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 2.45x versus 0.02x for Navya SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renault SA has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 4.71% beat Renault SA's return on equity of -44.15%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Renault SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kering SA has higher upside potential than Renault SA, analysts believe Kering SA is more attractive than Renault SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.540, which suggesting that the stock is 53.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renault SA has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.857%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Renault SA offers a yield of 6.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Kering SA pays 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Renault SA pays out 49.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renault SA quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Renault SA's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 812.56x while Renault SA's PE ratio is 16.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 2.45x versus 0.16x for Renault SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valeo SE has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 4.71% beat Valeo SE's return on equity of 3%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Valeo SE has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could fall by -2.93%. Given that Valeo SE has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Valeo SE is more attractive than Kering SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.540, which suggesting that the stock is 53.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valeo SE has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.397%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Valeo SE offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Kering SA pays 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SE pays out 49.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valeo SE quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Valeo SE's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 812.56x while Valeo SE's PE ratio is 24.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 2.45x versus 0.16x for Valeo SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.