TDHOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 3.98% compared to T&D Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 19.08%. T&D Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.15% beat Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.46%.

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could fall by -6.15%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than T&D Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than T&D Holdings, Inc..

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.078, which suggesting that the stock is 92.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.343, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.666%.

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. T&D Holdings, Inc. pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. pays out 32.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T&D Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.2B. T&D Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $205.6M is lower than Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $2.7B. Notably, T&D Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T&D Holdings, Inc. is 0.59x versus 1.68x for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 3.98% compared to T&D Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 24.1%. T&D Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.15% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.19%.

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.14 which suggests that it could fall by -6.04%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than T&D Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than T&D Holdings, Inc..

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.078, which suggesting that the stock is 92.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.340, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.037%.

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. T&D Holdings, Inc. pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. pays out 33.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T&D Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22B. T&D Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $205.6M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $5.3B. Notably, T&D Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T&D Holdings, Inc. is 0.59x versus 2.29x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.98% compared to T&D Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.25%. T&D Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.15% beat Nomura Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64%.

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.98 which suggests that it could grow by 7.17%. Given that Nomura Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than T&D Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Nomura Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than T&D Holdings, Inc..

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.078, which suggesting that the stock is 92.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.499%.

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nomura Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. T&D Holdings, Inc. pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings, Inc. pays out 53.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T&D Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than Nomura Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.9B. T&D Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $205.6M is lower than Nomura Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $649.6M. Notably, T&D Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Nomura Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T&D Holdings, Inc. is 0.59x versus 0.83x for Nomura Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ribbon Acquisition Corp. has a net margin of 3.98% compared to T&D Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. T&D Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.15% beat Ribbon Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity of 1.9%.

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ribbon Acquisition Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that T&D Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ribbon Acquisition Corp., analysts believe T&D Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Ribbon Acquisition Corp..

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.078, which suggesting that the stock is 92.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ribbon Acquisition Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

T&D Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ribbon Acquisition Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. T&D Holdings, Inc. pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Ribbon Acquisition Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. T&D Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T&D Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Ribbon Acquisition Corp. quarterly revenues of --. T&D Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $205.6M is higher than Ribbon Acquisition Corp.'s net income of $400. Notably, T&D Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.87x while Ribbon Acquisition Corp.'s PE ratio is 17,275.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T&D Holdings, Inc. is 0.59x versus -- for Ribbon Acquisition Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.