NMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 17.65% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 29.16%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 9.14%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.16, signalling upside risk potential of 30.16%. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $12.90 which suggests that it could grow by 5.18%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.621%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $11B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.53x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.50x versus 3.21x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

B. Riley Financial has a net margin of 17.65% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of -14.33%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66% beat B. Riley Financial's return on equity of -37.71%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.16, signalling upside risk potential of 30.16%. On the other hand B. Riley Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 971.43%. Given that B. Riley Financial has higher upside potential than Nomura Holdings, analysts believe B. Riley Financial is more attractive than Nomura Holdings.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B. Riley Financial has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.963%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. B. Riley Financial offers a yield of 107.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. B. Riley Financial pays out -149.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than B. Riley Financial quarterly revenues of $343M. Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M is higher than B. Riley Financial's net income of -$49.2M. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.53x while B. Riley Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.50x versus 0.06x for B. Riley Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a net margin of 17.65% compared to Nomura Holdings's net margin of 31.35%. Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66% beat Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's return on equity of 7.64%.

Nomura Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.16, signalling upside risk potential of 30.16%. On the other hand Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $16.03 which suggests that it could grow by 14.32%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group.

Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.284% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a beta of 0.409, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.121%.

Nomura Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Nomura Holdings pays 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M is lower than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Nomura Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.53x while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's PE ratio is 10.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomura Holdings is 1.50x versus 2.71x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.