TCYSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ehave has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Tecsys's net margin of --. Tecsys's return on equity of 3.8% beat Ehave's return on equity of --.

Tecsys has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ehave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tecsys has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Tecsys is more attractive than Ehave.

Tecsys has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ehave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tecsys has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Ehave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecsys pays 246.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Ehave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tecsys quarterly revenues are $31.1M, which are larger than Ehave quarterly revenues of --. Tecsys's net income of $555.2K is higher than Ehave's net income of --. Notably, Tecsys's price-to-earnings ratio is 248.65x while Ehave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecsys is 3.64x versus -- for Ehave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Tecsys's net margin of -9.14%. Tecsys's return on equity of 3.8% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Tecsys has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.83%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Tecsys, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Tecsys.

Tecsys has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Tecsys has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecsys pays 246.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tecsys quarterly revenues are $31.1M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Tecsys's net income of $555.2K is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Tecsys's price-to-earnings ratio is 248.65x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecsys is 3.64x versus 1.13x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LeddarTech Holdings has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Tecsys's net margin of -938.01%. Tecsys's return on equity of 3.8% beat LeddarTech Holdings's return on equity of --.

Tecsys has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LeddarTech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.99 which suggests that it could grow by 69.63%. Given that LeddarTech Holdings has higher upside potential than Tecsys, analysts believe LeddarTech Holdings is more attractive than Tecsys.

Tecsys has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeddarTech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tecsys has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. LeddarTech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecsys pays 246.62% of its earnings as a dividend. LeddarTech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tecsys quarterly revenues are $31.1M, which are larger than LeddarTech Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Tecsys's net income of $555.2K is higher than LeddarTech Holdings's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Tecsys's price-to-earnings ratio is 248.65x while LeddarTech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecsys is 3.64x versus 53.83x for LeddarTech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Versus Systems has a net margin of 1.79% compared to Tecsys's net margin of -13746.13%. Tecsys's return on equity of 3.8% beat Versus Systems's return on equity of -275.9%.

Tecsys has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Versus Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -18.79%. Given that Versus Systems has higher upside potential than Tecsys, analysts believe Versus Systems is more attractive than Tecsys.

Tecsys has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Versus Systems has a beta of 1.728, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.804%.

Tecsys has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Versus Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecsys pays 246.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Versus Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tecsys quarterly revenues are $31.1M, which are larger than Versus Systems quarterly revenues of $3.9K. Tecsys's net income of $555.2K is higher than Versus Systems's net income of -$529K. Notably, Tecsys's price-to-earnings ratio is 248.65x while Versus Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecsys is 3.64x versus 67.37x for Versus Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.