Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Buy
87
SWSDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1,223.37
Seasonality move
:
9.52%
Day range:
$1,223.37 - $1,223.37
52-week range:
$734.97 - $1,223.37
Dividend yield:
3.42%
P/E ratio:
25.42x
P/S ratio:
1.99x
P/B ratio:
3.77x
Volume:
65
Avg. volume:
24
1-year change:
59.37%
Market cap:
$34.9B
Revenue:
$17.3B
EPS (TTM):
$47.96
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWSDF
Swiss Life Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLHEY
Bâloise Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CB
Chubb Ltd.
|
$13B | $6.16 | -21.12% | 3.16% | $311.09 |
|
GMHLF
GAM Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UBS
UBS Group AG
|
$12.6B | $0.60 | -39.28% | 177.62% | $49.32 |
|
ZURVY
Zurich Insurance Group AG
|
$10.5B | -- | -- | -- | $37.45 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWSDF
Swiss Life Holding AG
|
$1,223.37 | -- | $34.9B | 25.42x | $41.88 | 3.42% | 1.99x |
|
BLHEY
Bâloise Holding AG
|
$23.50 | -- | $10.7B | 20.98x | $24.56 | 4.16% | 1.13x |
|
CB
Chubb Ltd.
|
$313.47 | $311.09 | $123.4B | 13.09x | $0.97 | 1.22% | 2.16x |
|
GMHLF
GAM Holding AG
|
$0.22 | -- | $237.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.05x |
|
UBS
UBS Group AG
|
$47.27 | $49.32 | $147.7B | 21.29x | $0.45 | 0.95% | 1.96x |
|
ZURVY
Zurich Insurance Group AG
|
$38.16 | $37.45 | $108.6B | 18.65x | $1.70 | 4.45% | 1.38x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWSDF
Swiss Life Holding AG
|
55.08% | 0.195 | -- | 153.11x |
|
BLHEY
Bâloise Holding AG
|
61.07% | -0.841 | -- | 175.56x |
|
CB
Chubb Ltd.
|
23.6% | -0.233 | 18.92% | 0.00x |
|
GMHLF
GAM Holding AG
|
62.6% | 1.847 | -- | 0.95x |
|
UBS
UBS Group AG
|
81.43% | 1.548 | 306.95% | 0.00x |
|
ZURVY
Zurich Insurance Group AG
|
33.6% | -0.485 | -- | 45.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWSDF
Swiss Life Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 7% | 15.24% | -- | -- |
|
BLHEY
Bâloise Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 5.32% | 10.93% | -- | -- |
|
CB
Chubb Ltd.
|
-- | $4B | 10.92% | 13.95% | 23.92% | $3.9B |
|
GMHLF
GAM Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -16.75% | -82.07% | -- | -- |
|
UBS
UBS Group AG
|
-- | $2.1B | 1.55% | 8.36% | 47.43% | $8B |
|
ZURVY
Zurich Insurance Group AG
|
-- | -- | 14.67% | 22.14% | -- | -- |
Swiss Life Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SWSDF or BLHEY?
Bâloise Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Swiss Life Holding AG's net margin of --. Swiss Life Holding AG's return on equity of 15.24% beat Bâloise Holding AG's return on equity of 10.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG-- -- $18.7B BLHEYBâloise Holding AG-- -- $10.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SWSDF or BLHEY?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bâloise Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swiss Life Holding AG has higher upside potential than Bâloise Holding AG, analysts believe Swiss Life Holding AG is more attractive than Bâloise Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG0 0 0 BLHEYBâloise Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is SWSDF or BLHEY More Risky?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bâloise Holding AG has a beta of -0.087, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.696%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWSDF or BLHEY?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $41.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. Bâloise Holding AG offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $24.56 per share. Swiss Life Holding AG pays 82.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Bâloise Holding AG pays out 58.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWSDF or BLHEY?
Swiss Life Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bâloise Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Swiss Life Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Bâloise Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Swiss Life Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.42x while Bâloise Holding AG's PE ratio is 20.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swiss Life Holding AG is 1.99x versus 1.13x for Bâloise Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG1.99x 25.42x -- -- BLHEYBâloise Holding AG1.13x 20.98x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWSDF or CB?
Chubb Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Swiss Life Holding AG's net margin of 19.08%. Swiss Life Holding AG's return on equity of 15.24% beat Chubb Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG-- -- $18.7B CBChubb Ltd.-- $6.99 $100B -
What do Analysts Say About SWSDF or CB?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chubb Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $311.09 which suggests that it could fall by -0.76%. Given that Chubb Ltd. has higher upside potential than Swiss Life Holding AG, analysts believe Chubb Ltd. is more attractive than Swiss Life Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG0 0 0 CBChubb Ltd.5 15 0 -
Is SWSDF or CB More Risky?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chubb Ltd. has a beta of 0.515, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.503%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWSDF or CB?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $41.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. Chubb Ltd. offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Swiss Life Holding AG pays 82.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Chubb Ltd. pays out 15.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWSDF or CB?
Swiss Life Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chubb Ltd. quarterly revenues of $16.3B. Swiss Life Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Chubb Ltd.'s net income of $3.1B. Notably, Swiss Life Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.42x while Chubb Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swiss Life Holding AG is 1.99x versus 2.16x for Chubb Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG1.99x 25.42x -- -- CBChubb Ltd.2.16x 13.09x $16.3B $3.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns SWSDF or GMHLF?
GAM Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Swiss Life Holding AG's net margin of --. Swiss Life Holding AG's return on equity of 15.24% beat GAM Holding AG's return on equity of -82.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG-- -- $18.7B GMHLFGAM Holding AG-- -- $116.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SWSDF or GMHLF?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GAM Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swiss Life Holding AG has higher upside potential than GAM Holding AG, analysts believe Swiss Life Holding AG is more attractive than GAM Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG0 0 0 GMHLFGAM Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is SWSDF or GMHLF More Risky?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GAM Holding AG has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.045%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWSDF or GMHLF?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $41.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. GAM Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swiss Life Holding AG pays 82.52% of its earnings as a dividend. GAM Holding AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swiss Life Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWSDF or GMHLF?
Swiss Life Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GAM Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Swiss Life Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than GAM Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Swiss Life Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.42x while GAM Holding AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swiss Life Holding AG is 1.99x versus 2.05x for GAM Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG1.99x 25.42x -- -- GMHLFGAM Holding AG2.05x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWSDF or UBS?
UBS Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to Swiss Life Holding AG's net margin of 12.45%. Swiss Life Holding AG's return on equity of 15.24% beat UBS Group AG's return on equity of 8.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG-- -- $18.7B UBSUBS Group AG-- $0.76 $484.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SWSDF or UBS?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UBS Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $49.32 which suggests that it could grow by 4.33%. Given that UBS Group AG has higher upside potential than Swiss Life Holding AG, analysts believe UBS Group AG is more attractive than Swiss Life Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG0 0 0 UBSUBS Group AG1 0 0 -
Is SWSDF or UBS More Risky?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UBS Group AG has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.951%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWSDF or UBS?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $41.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. UBS Group AG offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Swiss Life Holding AG pays 82.52% of its earnings as a dividend. UBS Group AG pays out 52.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWSDF or UBS?
Swiss Life Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than UBS Group AG quarterly revenues of $20B. Swiss Life Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than UBS Group AG's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Swiss Life Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.42x while UBS Group AG's PE ratio is 21.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swiss Life Holding AG is 1.99x versus 1.96x for UBS Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG1.99x 25.42x -- -- UBSUBS Group AG1.96x 21.29x $20B $2.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns SWSDF or ZURVY?
Zurich Insurance Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to Swiss Life Holding AG's net margin of --. Swiss Life Holding AG's return on equity of 15.24% beat Zurich Insurance Group AG's return on equity of 22.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG-- -- $18.7B ZURVYZurich Insurance Group AG-- -- $39.8B -
What do Analysts Say About SWSDF or ZURVY?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zurich Insurance Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $37.45 which suggests that it could fall by -1.85%. Given that Zurich Insurance Group AG has higher upside potential than Swiss Life Holding AG, analysts believe Zurich Insurance Group AG is more attractive than Swiss Life Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG0 0 0 ZURVYZurich Insurance Group AG0 0 0 -
Is SWSDF or ZURVY More Risky?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurich Insurance Group AG has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.9%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWSDF or ZURVY?
Swiss Life Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $41.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.42%. Zurich Insurance Group AG offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Swiss Life Holding AG pays 82.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurich Insurance Group AG pays out 50.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWSDF or ZURVY?
Swiss Life Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zurich Insurance Group AG quarterly revenues of --. Swiss Life Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Zurich Insurance Group AG's net income of --. Notably, Swiss Life Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.42x while Zurich Insurance Group AG's PE ratio is 18.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swiss Life Holding AG is 1.99x versus 1.38x for Zurich Insurance Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWSDFSwiss Life Holding AG1.99x 25.42x -- -- ZURVYZurich Insurance Group AG1.38x 18.65x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.
