GMHLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chubb Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to GAM Holding AG's net margin of 19.08%. GAM Holding AG's return on equity of -82.07% beat Chubb Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.95%.

GAM Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chubb Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $307.95 which suggests that it could grow by 4.52%. Given that Chubb Ltd. has higher upside potential than GAM Holding AG, analysts believe Chubb Ltd. is more attractive than GAM Holding AG.

GAM Holding AG has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.045% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chubb Ltd. has a beta of 0.515, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.503%.

GAM Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chubb Ltd. offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. GAM Holding AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chubb Ltd. pays out 15.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Chubb Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GAM Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chubb Ltd. quarterly revenues of $16.3B. GAM Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Chubb Ltd.'s net income of $3.1B. Notably, GAM Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chubb Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAM Holding AG is 2.05x versus 2.03x for Chubb Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Julius Bär Gruppe AG has a net margin of -- compared to GAM Holding AG's net margin of --. GAM Holding AG's return on equity of -82.07% beat Julius Bär Gruppe AG's return on equity of 13.21%.

GAM Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Julius Bär Gruppe AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GAM Holding AG has higher upside potential than Julius Bär Gruppe AG, analysts believe GAM Holding AG is more attractive than Julius Bär Gruppe AG.

GAM Holding AG has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.045% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Julius Bär Gruppe AG has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.049%.

GAM Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Julius Bär Gruppe AG offers a yield of 4.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. GAM Holding AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Julius Bär Gruppe AG pays out 28.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Julius Bär Gruppe AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GAM Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Julius Bär Gruppe AG quarterly revenues of --. GAM Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Julius Bär Gruppe AG's net income of --. Notably, GAM Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Julius Bär Gruppe AG's PE ratio is 14.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAM Holding AG is 2.05x versus 2.04x for Julius Bär Gruppe AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UBS Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to GAM Holding AG's net margin of 12.45%. GAM Holding AG's return on equity of -82.07% beat UBS Group AG's return on equity of 8.36%.

GAM Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UBS Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $41.17 which suggests that it could grow by 6.07%. Given that UBS Group AG has higher upside potential than GAM Holding AG, analysts believe UBS Group AG is more attractive than GAM Holding AG.

GAM Holding AG has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.045% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UBS Group AG has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.951%.

GAM Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UBS Group AG offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. GAM Holding AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UBS Group AG pays out 52.54% of its earnings as a dividend. UBS Group AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GAM Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than UBS Group AG quarterly revenues of $20B. GAM Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than UBS Group AG's net income of $2.5B. Notably, GAM Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UBS Group AG's PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAM Holding AG is 2.05x versus 1.61x for UBS Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zurich Insurance Group AG has a net margin of -- compared to GAM Holding AG's net margin of --. GAM Holding AG's return on equity of -82.07% beat Zurich Insurance Group AG's return on equity of 22.14%.

GAM Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zurich Insurance Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $37.45 which suggests that it could grow by 4.85%. Given that Zurich Insurance Group AG has higher upside potential than GAM Holding AG, analysts believe Zurich Insurance Group AG is more attractive than GAM Holding AG.

GAM Holding AG has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.045% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurich Insurance Group AG has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.9%.

GAM Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zurich Insurance Group AG offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. GAM Holding AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurich Insurance Group AG pays out 50.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurich Insurance Group AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GAM Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zurich Insurance Group AG quarterly revenues of --. GAM Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Zurich Insurance Group AG's net income of --. Notably, GAM Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zurich Insurance Group AG's PE ratio is 17.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAM Holding AG is 2.05x versus 1.29x for Zurich Insurance Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.