Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
77
SMTLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.09
Seasonality move
:
-13.68%
Day range:
$0.09 - $0.09
52-week range:
$0.04 - $0.11
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.78x
P/B ratio:
0.24x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
8
1-year change:
58.96%
Market cap:
$147.5M
Revenue:
$153.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.09 | -- | $147.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.78x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$0.24 | -- | $1B | 4.59x | $0.01 | 5.95% | 0.57x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$36.15 | -- | $12.5B | 7.39x | $0.68 | 5.54% | 0.91x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
$7.16 | -- | $15.3B | 19.31x | $0.10 | 5.06% | 145.48x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$0.0021 | -- | $10.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.53x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
16.77% | -0.070 | -- | 2.80x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
79.58% | 0.187 | -- | 0.65x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
63.41% | 0.208 | -- | 0.52x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
2.8% | -0.263 | -- | 0.68x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
217.69% | -14.998 | -- | 0.47x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -7.98% | -8.62% | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.2% | 14.22% | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.05% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.78% | 7% | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -19.25% | -- | -- | -- |
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or CGEGF?
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or CGEGF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or CGEGF More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -2.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 334.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or CGEGF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or CGEGF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.78x versus 0.57x for CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.78x -- -- -- CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.57x 4.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or CRPJY?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or CRPJY?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or CRPJY More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.36%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or CRPJY?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 36.05% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or CRPJY?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.78x versus 0.91x for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.78x -- -- -- CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.91x 7.39x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or HGKGY?
Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or HGKGY?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings Ltd., analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or HGKGY More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.899%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or HGKGY?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 5.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. pays out 86.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or HGKGY?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.78x versus 145.48x for Power Assets Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.78x -- -- -- HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.145.48x 19.31x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or PVLTF?
Beijing Energy International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat Beijing Energy International Holding's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or PVLTF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beijing Energy International Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Beijing Energy International Holding, analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Beijing Energy International Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or PVLTF More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beijing Energy International Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or PVLTF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Beijing Energy International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Energy International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or PVLTF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beijing Energy International Holding quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Beijing Energy International Holding's net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Beijing Energy International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.78x versus -- for Beijing Energy International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.78x -- -- -- PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or SHUNF?
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $214.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or SHUNF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or SHUNF More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.471% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.051, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.877%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or SHUNF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or SHUNF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.78x versus 0.53x for Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.78x -- -- -- SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0.53x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
