Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
72
SMTLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.09
Seasonality move
:
-12.21%
Day range:
$0.09 - $0.09
52-week range:
$0.04 - $0.11
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.77x
P/B ratio:
0.24x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
3
1-year change:
106.55%
Market cap:
$144.5M
Revenue:
$153.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRPJF
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGKGF
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.09 | -- | $144.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$0.24 | -- | $1B | 4.59x | $0.01 | 5.9% | 0.57x |
|
CRPJF
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$2.33 | -- | $12.1B | 7.15x | $0.05 | 5.74% | 0.88x |
|
HGKGF
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
$7.36 | -- | $15.7B | 17.93x | $0.10 | 4.9% | 149.55x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$0.0021 | -- | $10.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.53x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
16.77% | -0.468 | -- | 2.80x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
79.58% | 0.204 | -- | 0.65x |
|
CRPJF
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
63.41% | -0.054 | -- | 0.52x |
|
HGKGF
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
2.8% | 0.732 | -- | 0.68x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
217.69% | -20.502 | -- | 0.47x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -7.98% | -8.62% | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.2% | 14.22% | -- | -- |
|
CRPJF
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.05% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
|
HGKGF
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.78% | 7% | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -19.25% | -- | -- | -- |
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or CGEGF?
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or CGEGF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or CGEGF More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -2.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 336.493%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or CGEGF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or CGEGF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.77x versus 0.57x for CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.77x -- -- -- CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.57x 4.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or CRPJF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or CRPJF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or CRPJF More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.860, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.982%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or CRPJF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 38.64% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or CRPJF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.77x versus 0.88x for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.77x -- -- -- CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.88x 7.15x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or HGKGF?
Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M HGKGFPower Assets Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or HGKGF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings Ltd., analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HGKGFPower Assets Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or HGKGF More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.445, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.468%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or HGKGF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. pays out 98.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or HGKGF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.77x versus 149.55x for Power Assets Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.77x -- -- -- HGKGFPower Assets Holdings Ltd.149.55x 17.93x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or PVLTF?
Beijing Energy International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat Beijing Energy International Holding's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or PVLTF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beijing Energy International Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Beijing Energy International Holding, analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Beijing Energy International Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or PVLTF More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beijing Energy International Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or PVLTF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Beijing Energy International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Energy International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or PVLTF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beijing Energy International Holding quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Beijing Energy International Holding's net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Beijing Energy International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.77x versus -- for Beijing Energy International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.77x -- -- -- PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMTLF or SHUNF?
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62% beat Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $214.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SMTLF or SHUNF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SMTLF or SHUNF More Risky?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.45%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMTLF or SHUNF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMTLF or SHUNF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. is 0.77x versus 0.53x for Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.77x -- -- -- SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0.53x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
