Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
74
CRPJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.33
Seasonality move
:
6.72%
Day range:
$2.33 - $2.33
52-week range:
$2.25 - $2.33
Dividend yield:
5.74%
P/E ratio:
7.15x
P/S ratio:
0.88x
P/B ratio:
0.85x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
471
1-year change:
3.56%
Market cap:
$12.1B
Revenue:
$13.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRPJF
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGKGF
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRPJF
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$2.33 | -- | $12.1B | 7.15x | $0.05 | 5.74% | 0.88x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$0.24 | -- | $1B | 4.59x | $0.01 | 5.9% | 0.57x |
|
HGKGF
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
$7.36 | -- | $15.7B | 17.93x | $0.10 | 4.9% | 149.55x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$0.0021 | -- | $10.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.53x |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.09 | -- | $144.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRPJF
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
63.41% | -0.054 | -- | 0.52x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
79.58% | 0.204 | -- | 0.65x |
|
HGKGF
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
2.8% | 0.732 | -- | 0.68x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
217.69% | -20.502 | -- | 0.47x |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
16.77% | -0.468 | -- | 2.80x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRPJF
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.05% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.2% | 14.22% | -- | -- |
|
HGKGF
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.78% | 7% | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -19.25% | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -7.98% | -8.62% | -- | -- |
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CRPJF or CGEGF?
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16% beat CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CRPJF or CGEGF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRPJF or CGEGF More Risky?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 185.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -2.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 336.493%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRPJF or CGEGF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 38.64% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRPJF or CGEGF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.88x versus 0.57x for CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.88x 7.15x -- -- CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.57x 4.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CRPJF or HGKGF?
Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16% beat Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B HGKGFPower Assets Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CRPJF or HGKGF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 HGKGFPower Assets Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRPJF or HGKGF More Risky?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 185.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.445, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.468%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRPJF or HGKGF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 38.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. pays out 98.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRPJF or HGKGF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.88x versus 149.55x for Power Assets Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.88x 7.15x -- -- HGKGFPower Assets Holdings Ltd.149.55x 17.93x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CRPJF or PVLTF?
Beijing Energy International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16% beat Beijing Energy International Holding's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CRPJF or PVLTF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beijing Energy International Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Beijing Energy International Holding, analysts believe China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Beijing Energy International Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding0 0 0 -
Is CRPJF or PVLTF More Risky?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 185.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beijing Energy International Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRPJF or PVLTF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. Beijing Energy International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 38.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Energy International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRPJF or PVLTF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beijing Energy International Holding quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Beijing Energy International Holding's net income of --. Notably, China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Beijing Energy International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.88x versus -- for Beijing Energy International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.88x 7.15x -- -- PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CRPJF or SHUNF?
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16% beat Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $214.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CRPJF or SHUNF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRPJF or SHUNF More Risky?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 185.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.45%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRPJF or SHUNF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 38.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRPJF or SHUNF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.88x versus 0.53x for Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.88x 7.15x -- -- SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0.53x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CRPJF or SMTLF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16% beat GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M -
What do Analysts Say About CRPJF or SMTLF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is more attractive than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRPJF or SMTLF More Risky?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 185.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.638, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.206%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRPJF or SMTLF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays 38.64% of its earnings as a dividend. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRPJF or SMTLF?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.15x while GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. is 0.88x versus 0.77x for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRPJFChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.88x 7.15x -- -- SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.77x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
