SLAMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Slam Corp.'s net margin of 19.49%. Slam Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Slam Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.08 which suggests that it could grow by 9.78%. Given that Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has higher upside potential than Slam Corp., analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. is more attractive than Slam Corp..

Slam Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.559, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.06%.

Slam Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 11.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Slam Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 84.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Slam Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $36.4M. Slam Corp.'s net income of -$692.2K is lower than Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Slam Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 144.63x while Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Slam Corp. is -- versus 3.48x for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graf Global Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Slam Corp.'s net margin of --. Slam Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Graf Global Corp.'s return on equity of 3.79%.

Slam Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graf Global Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Slam Corp. has higher upside potential than Graf Global Corp., analysts believe Slam Corp. is more attractive than Graf Global Corp..

Slam Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Slam Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Slam Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Slam Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graf Global Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Slam Corp.'s net income of -$692.2K is lower than Graf Global Corp.'s net income of $1.7M. Notably, Slam Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 144.63x while Graf Global Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Slam Corp. is -- versus -- for Graf Global Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Legato Merger Corp. III has a net margin of -- compared to Slam Corp.'s net margin of --. Slam Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Legato Merger Corp. III's return on equity of 4.1%.

Slam Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Legato Merger Corp. III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Slam Corp. has higher upside potential than Legato Merger Corp. III, analysts believe Slam Corp. is more attractive than Legato Merger Corp. III.

Slam Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Legato Merger Corp. III has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Slam Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Legato Merger Corp. III offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Slam Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Legato Merger Corp. III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Slam Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Legato Merger Corp. III quarterly revenues of --. Slam Corp.'s net income of -$692.2K is lower than Legato Merger Corp. III's net income of $2M. Notably, Slam Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 144.63x while Legato Merger Corp. III's PE ratio is 32.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Slam Corp. is -- versus -- for Legato Merger Corp. III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trailblazer Merger Corp. I has a net margin of -- compared to Slam Corp.'s net margin of --. Slam Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Trailblazer Merger Corp. I's return on equity of -32.93%.

Slam Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trailblazer Merger Corp. I has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Slam Corp. has higher upside potential than Trailblazer Merger Corp. I, analysts believe Slam Corp. is more attractive than Trailblazer Merger Corp. I.

Slam Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trailblazer Merger Corp. I has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Slam Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trailblazer Merger Corp. I offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Slam Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trailblazer Merger Corp. I pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Slam Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trailblazer Merger Corp. I quarterly revenues of --. Slam Corp.'s net income of -$692.2K is higher than Trailblazer Merger Corp. I's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Slam Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 144.63x while Trailblazer Merger Corp. I's PE ratio is 266.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Slam Corp. is -- versus -- for Trailblazer Merger Corp. I. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.