Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
58
CCAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.55
Seasonality move
:
4.73%
Day range:
$19.29 - $19.67
52-week range:
$15.91 - $20.03
Dividend yield:
9.88%
P/E ratio:
7.63x
P/S ratio:
6.96x
P/B ratio:
0.97x
Volume:
110.9K
Avg. volume:
111.8K
1-year change:
12.3%
Market cap:
$724.4M
Revenue:
$92.5M
EPS (TTM):
$2.56
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
|
$48.9M | $0.58 | 42.32% | -33.33% | -- |
|
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVE
EVe Mobility Acquisition
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRAF
Graf Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UMAC
Unusual Machines
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $14.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
|
$19.55 | -- | $724.4M | 7.63x | $0.07 | 9.88% | 6.96x |
|
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
|
$10.54 | -- | $41.3M | 59.33x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
EVE
EVe Mobility Acquisition
|
$11.27 | -- | $162.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GRAF
Graf Global
|
$10.07 | -- | $289.5M | 98.00x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
|
$11.35 | -- | $62.8M | 1,108.00x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
UMAC
Unusual Machines
|
$12.61 | $14.00 | $104.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
|
53.38% | 0.834 | 125.03% | 0.80x |
|
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
|
-- | 0.024 | -- | -- |
|
EVE
EVe Mobility Acquisition
|
-- | -0.066 | -- | -- |
|
GRAF
Graf Global
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
|
-- | -0.011 | -- | -- |
|
UMAC
Unusual Machines
|
13.5% | 0.000 | 31.91% | 0.87x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
|
-- | -- | 5.91% | 12.68% | 172.63% | $46.9M |
|
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
|
-- | -$287.8K | -- | -- | -- | -$21.3K |
|
EVE
EVe Mobility Acquisition
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRAF
Graf Global
|
-- | -$195.2K | -- | -- | -- | -$585.7K |
|
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
|
-- | -$1.1M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UMAC
Unusual Machines
|
$399.5K | -$1.5M | -- | -- | -137.32% | -$536.7K |
Crescent Capital BDC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CCAP or DMYY?
dMY Squared Technology Group has a net margin of 84.43% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of --. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68% beat dMY Squared Technology Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCAPCrescent Capital BDC-- $0.41 $1.6B DMYYdMY Squared Technology Group-- $0.04 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCAP or DMYY?
Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.62%. On the other hand dMY Squared Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Capital BDC has higher upside potential than dMY Squared Technology Group, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than dMY Squared Technology Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCAPCrescent Capital BDC0 0 0 DMYYdMY Squared Technology Group0 0 0 -
Is CCAP or DMYY More Risky?
Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison dMY Squared Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCAP or DMYY?
Crescent Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.88%. dMY Squared Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Capital BDC pays 77% of its earnings as a dividend. dMY Squared Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCAP or DMYY?
Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $18.1M, which are larger than dMY Squared Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M is higher than dMY Squared Technology Group's net income of $145.5K. Notably, Crescent Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.63x while dMY Squared Technology Group's PE ratio is 59.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Capital BDC is 6.96x versus -- for dMY Squared Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCAPCrescent Capital BDC6.96x 7.63x $18.1M $15.3M DMYYdMY Squared Technology Group-- 59.33x -- $145.5K
-
Which has Higher Returns CCAP or EVE?
EVe Mobility Acquisition has a net margin of 84.43% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of --. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68% beat EVe Mobility Acquisition's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCAPCrescent Capital BDC-- $0.41 $1.6B EVEEVe Mobility Acquisition-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCAP or EVE?
Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.62%. On the other hand EVe Mobility Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Capital BDC has higher upside potential than EVe Mobility Acquisition, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than EVe Mobility Acquisition.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCAPCrescent Capital BDC0 0 0 EVEEVe Mobility Acquisition0 0 0 -
Is CCAP or EVE More Risky?
Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVe Mobility Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCAP or EVE?
Crescent Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.88%. EVe Mobility Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Capital BDC pays 77% of its earnings as a dividend. EVe Mobility Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCAP or EVE?
Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $18.1M, which are larger than EVe Mobility Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M is higher than EVe Mobility Acquisition's net income of --. Notably, Crescent Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.63x while EVe Mobility Acquisition's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Capital BDC is 6.96x versus -- for EVe Mobility Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCAPCrescent Capital BDC6.96x 7.63x $18.1M $15.3M EVEEVe Mobility Acquisition-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CCAP or GRAF?
Graf Global has a net margin of 84.43% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of --. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68% beat Graf Global's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCAPCrescent Capital BDC-- $0.41 $1.6B GRAFGraf Global-- $0.10 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCAP or GRAF?
Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.62%. On the other hand Graf Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Graf Global, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than Graf Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCAPCrescent Capital BDC0 0 0 GRAFGraf Global0 0 0 -
Is CCAP or GRAF More Risky?
Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCAP or GRAF?
Crescent Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.88%. Graf Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Capital BDC pays 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCAP or GRAF?
Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $18.1M, which are larger than Graf Global quarterly revenues of --. Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M is higher than Graf Global's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Crescent Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.63x while Graf Global's PE ratio is 98.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Capital BDC is 6.96x versus -- for Graf Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCAPCrescent Capital BDC6.96x 7.63x $18.1M $15.3M GRAFGraf Global-- 98.00x -- $2.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CCAP or MITA?
Coliseum Acquisition has a net margin of 84.43% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of --. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68% beat Coliseum Acquisition's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCAPCrescent Capital BDC-- $0.41 $1.6B MITAColiseum Acquisition-- -$0.11 -- -
What do Analysts Say About CCAP or MITA?
Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.62%. On the other hand Coliseum Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Coliseum Acquisition, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than Coliseum Acquisition.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCAPCrescent Capital BDC0 0 0 MITAColiseum Acquisition0 0 0 -
Is CCAP or MITA More Risky?
Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coliseum Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCAP or MITA?
Crescent Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.88%. Coliseum Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Capital BDC pays 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Coliseum Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCAP or MITA?
Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $18.1M, which are larger than Coliseum Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M is higher than Coliseum Acquisition's net income of -$694.9K. Notably, Crescent Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.63x while Coliseum Acquisition's PE ratio is 1,108.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Capital BDC is 6.96x versus -- for Coliseum Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCAPCrescent Capital BDC6.96x 7.63x $18.1M $15.3M MITAColiseum Acquisition-- 1,108.00x -- -$694.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns CCAP or UMAC?
Unusual Machines has a net margin of 84.43% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of -140.03%. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68% beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CCAPCrescent Capital BDC-- $0.41 $1.6B UMACUnusual Machines26.09% -$0.30 $22.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CCAP or UMAC?
Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.62%. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.02%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Crescent Capital BDC, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Crescent Capital BDC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CCAPCrescent Capital BDC0 0 0 UMACUnusual Machines1 0 0 -
Is CCAP or UMAC More Risky?
Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCAP or UMAC?
Crescent Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.88%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Capital BDC pays 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CCAP or UMAC?
Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $18.1M, which are larger than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M is higher than Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Crescent Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.63x while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Capital BDC is 6.96x versus -- for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CCAPCrescent Capital BDC6.96x 7.63x $18.1M $15.3M UMACUnusual Machines-- -- $1.5M -$2.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
