SIXGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG has a net margin of 13.7% compared to Sixt SE's net margin of --. Sixt SE's return on equity of 14.4% beat KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's return on equity of 0.62%.

Sixt SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sixt SE has higher upside potential than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG, analysts believe Sixt SE is more attractive than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG.

Sixt SE has a beta of -0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 104.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG has a beta of -0.373, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 137.264%.

Sixt SE has a quarterly dividend of $3.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Sixt SE pays 51.96% of its earnings as a dividend. KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sixt SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sixt SE quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG quarterly revenues of --. Sixt SE's net income of $212.1M is higher than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's net income of --. Notably, Sixt SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.90x while KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's PE ratio is 6.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sixt SE is 0.83x versus 0.44x for KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schmid Group NV has a net margin of 13.7% compared to Sixt SE's net margin of --. Sixt SE's return on equity of 14.4% beat Schmid Group NV's return on equity of --.

Sixt SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schmid Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sixt SE has higher upside potential than Schmid Group NV, analysts believe Sixt SE is more attractive than Schmid Group NV.

Sixt SE has a beta of -0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 104.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schmid Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sixt SE has a quarterly dividend of $3.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Schmid Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sixt SE pays 51.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Schmid Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sixt SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sixt SE quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Schmid Group NV quarterly revenues of --. Sixt SE's net income of $212.1M is higher than Schmid Group NV's net income of --. Notably, Sixt SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.90x while Schmid Group NV's PE ratio is 4.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sixt SE is 0.83x versus 1.60x for Schmid Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siemens AG has a net margin of 13.7% compared to Sixt SE's net margin of 8.7%. Sixt SE's return on equity of 14.4% beat Siemens AG's return on equity of 12.91%.

Sixt SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siemens AG has an analysts' consensus of $151.11 which suggests that it could grow by 7.63%. Given that Siemens AG has higher upside potential than Sixt SE, analysts believe Siemens AG is more attractive than Sixt SE.

Sixt SE has a beta of -0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 104.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siemens AG has a beta of 1.242, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.235%.

Sixt SE has a quarterly dividend of $3.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Siemens AG offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.72 per share. Sixt SE pays 51.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Siemens AG pays out 35.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sixt SE quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Siemens AG quarterly revenues of $25B. Sixt SE's net income of $212.1M is lower than Siemens AG's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Sixt SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.90x while Siemens AG's PE ratio is 21.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sixt SE is 0.83x versus 2.55x for Siemens AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XCHG Ltd. has a net margin of 13.7% compared to Sixt SE's net margin of -10.57%. Sixt SE's return on equity of 14.4% beat XCHG Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Sixt SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XCHG Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sixt SE has higher upside potential than XCHG Ltd., analysts believe Sixt SE is more attractive than XCHG Ltd..

Sixt SE has a beta of -0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 104.369% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XCHG Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sixt SE has a quarterly dividend of $3.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. XCHG Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sixt SE pays 51.96% of its earnings as a dividend. XCHG Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sixt SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sixt SE quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than XCHG Ltd. quarterly revenues of $9M. Sixt SE's net income of $212.1M is higher than XCHG Ltd.'s net income of -$951.2K. Notably, Sixt SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.90x while XCHG Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sixt SE is 0.83x versus 1.37x for XCHG Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.