Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
34
SHUFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.35
Seasonality move
:
1.55%
Day range:
$6.35 - $6.35
52-week range:
$6.35 - $6.35
Dividend yield:
8.83%
P/E ratio:
9.06x
P/S ratio:
0.41x
P/B ratio:
1.44x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$4.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.70
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHUFF
Shufersal Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CTGL
Citrine Global Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTTCF
Steakholder Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ODD
ODDITY Tech Ltd.
|
$145.5M | $0.35 | 22.21% | 55.8% | $67.55 |
|
SGLJF
Strauss Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WILC
G. Willi Food International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHUFF
Shufersal Ltd.
|
$6.35 | -- | $1.7B | 9.06x | $0.20 | 8.83% | 0.41x |
|
CTGL
Citrine Global Corp.
|
$0.2001 | -- | $247M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MTTCF
Steakholder Foods Ltd.
|
$0.0030 | -- | $6.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 134.13x |
|
ODD
ODDITY Tech Ltd.
|
$45.29 | $67.55 | $2.6B | 25.33x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.57x |
|
SGLJF
Strauss Group Ltd.
|
$15.04 | -- | $1.8B | 9.46x | $0.37 | 5.69% | 0.82x |
|
WILC
G. Willi Food International Ltd.
|
$25.75 | -- | $358.5M | 13.64x | $0.42 | 1.63% | 2.15x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHUFF
Shufersal Ltd.
|
61.79% | -0.024 | 110.12% | 0.68x |
|
CTGL
Citrine Global Corp.
|
-46.01% | 213.437 | 0.33% | 0.00x |
|
MTTCF
Steakholder Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -9.255 | -- | -- |
|
ODD
ODDITY Tech Ltd.
|
5.89% | 0.937 | 0.67% | 6.22x |
|
SGLJF
Strauss Group Ltd.
|
45.37% | -0.104 | 43.58% | 0.55x |
|
WILC
G. Willi Food International Ltd.
|
0.8% | 1.117 | 0.54% | 7.68x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHUFF
Shufersal Ltd.
|
$328.4M | $66M | 6.58% | 17.32% | 5.96% | $232.5M |
|
CTGL
Citrine Global Corp.
|
-- | -$377K | -- | -- | -- | -$220K |
|
MTTCF
Steakholder Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ODD
ODDITY Tech Ltd.
|
$105.9M | $17.4M | 30.26% | 32.32% | 11.74% | -$14.3M |
|
SGLJF
Strauss Group Ltd.
|
$192.4M | $48.5M | 12.14% | 21.62% | 7.94% | $12.6M |
|
WILC
G. Willi Food International Ltd.
|
$12.8M | $5.4M | 15.16% | 15.27% | 11.9% | $7.7M |
Shufersal Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SHUFF or CTGL?
Citrine Global Corp. has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Shufersal Ltd.'s net margin of --. Shufersal Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.32% beat Citrine Global Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHUFFShufersal Ltd.29.65% $0.17 $3.1B CTGLCitrine Global Corp.-- -$0.00 -$2.7M -
What do Analysts Say About SHUFF or CTGL?
Shufersal Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Citrine Global Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shufersal Ltd. has higher upside potential than Citrine Global Corp., analysts believe Shufersal Ltd. is more attractive than Citrine Global Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0 0 0 CTGLCitrine Global Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SHUFF or CTGL More Risky?
Shufersal Ltd. has a beta of -0.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citrine Global Corp. has a beta of 23.709, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2270.924%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHUFF or CTGL?
Shufersal Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.83%. Citrine Global Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shufersal Ltd. pays 54.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Citrine Global Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shufersal Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHUFF or CTGL?
Shufersal Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Citrine Global Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Shufersal Ltd.'s net income of $50M is higher than Citrine Global Corp.'s net income of -$386K. Notably, Shufersal Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Citrine Global Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shufersal Ltd. is 0.41x versus -- for Citrine Global Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0.41x 9.06x $1.1B $50M CTGLCitrine Global Corp.-- -- -- -$386K
-
Which has Higher Returns SHUFF or MTTCF?
Steakholder Foods Ltd. has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Shufersal Ltd.'s net margin of --. Shufersal Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.32% beat Steakholder Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHUFFShufersal Ltd.29.65% $0.17 $3.1B MTTCFSteakholder Foods Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SHUFF or MTTCF?
Shufersal Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Steakholder Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shufersal Ltd. has higher upside potential than Steakholder Foods Ltd., analysts believe Shufersal Ltd. is more attractive than Steakholder Foods Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0 0 0 MTTCFSteakholder Foods Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SHUFF or MTTCF More Risky?
Shufersal Ltd. has a beta of -0.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steakholder Foods Ltd. has a beta of -22.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2350.909%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHUFF or MTTCF?
Shufersal Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.83%. Steakholder Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shufersal Ltd. pays 54.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Steakholder Foods Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shufersal Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHUFF or MTTCF?
Shufersal Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Steakholder Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Shufersal Ltd.'s net income of $50M is higher than Steakholder Foods Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Shufersal Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Steakholder Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shufersal Ltd. is 0.41x versus 134.13x for Steakholder Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0.41x 9.06x $1.1B $50M MTTCFSteakholder Foods Ltd.134.13x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SHUFF or ODD?
ODDITY Tech Ltd. has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Shufersal Ltd.'s net margin of 12%. Shufersal Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.32% beat ODDITY Tech Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHUFFShufersal Ltd.29.65% $0.17 $3.1B ODDODDITY Tech Ltd.71.59% $0.28 $404.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SHUFF or ODD?
Shufersal Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ODDITY Tech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $67.55 which suggests that it could grow by 49.14%. Given that ODDITY Tech Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shufersal Ltd., analysts believe ODDITY Tech Ltd. is more attractive than Shufersal Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0 0 0 ODDODDITY Tech Ltd.5 3 0 -
Is SHUFF or ODD More Risky?
Shufersal Ltd. has a beta of -0.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ODDITY Tech Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHUFF or ODD?
Shufersal Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.83%. ODDITY Tech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shufersal Ltd. pays 54.67% of its earnings as a dividend. ODDITY Tech Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shufersal Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHUFF or ODD?
Shufersal Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than ODDITY Tech Ltd. quarterly revenues of $147.9M. Shufersal Ltd.'s net income of $50M is higher than ODDITY Tech Ltd.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Shufersal Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while ODDITY Tech Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shufersal Ltd. is 0.41x versus 3.57x for ODDITY Tech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0.41x 9.06x $1.1B $50M ODDODDITY Tech Ltd.3.57x 25.33x $147.9M $17.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SHUFF or SGLJF?
Strauss Group Ltd. has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Shufersal Ltd.'s net margin of 7.3%. Shufersal Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.32% beat Strauss Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHUFFShufersal Ltd.29.65% $0.17 $3.1B SGLJFStrauss Group Ltd.31.5% $0.32 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About SHUFF or SGLJF?
Shufersal Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strauss Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shufersal Ltd. has higher upside potential than Strauss Group Ltd., analysts believe Shufersal Ltd. is more attractive than Strauss Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0 0 0 SGLJFStrauss Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SHUFF or SGLJF More Risky?
Shufersal Ltd. has a beta of -0.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strauss Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.068, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.218%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHUFF or SGLJF?
Shufersal Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.83%. Strauss Group Ltd. offers a yield of 5.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Shufersal Ltd. pays 54.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Strauss Group Ltd. pays out 57.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHUFF or SGLJF?
Shufersal Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Strauss Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $610.9M. Shufersal Ltd.'s net income of $50M is higher than Strauss Group Ltd.'s net income of $44.6M. Notably, Shufersal Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Strauss Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shufersal Ltd. is 0.41x versus 0.82x for Strauss Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0.41x 9.06x $1.1B $50M SGLJFStrauss Group Ltd.0.82x 9.46x $610.9M $44.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SHUFF or WILC?
G. Willi Food International Ltd. has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Shufersal Ltd.'s net margin of 12.55%. Shufersal Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.32% beat G. Willi Food International Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHUFFShufersal Ltd.29.65% $0.17 $3.1B WILCG. Willi Food International Ltd.28.18% $0.41 $193.7M -
What do Analysts Say About SHUFF or WILC?
Shufersal Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand G. Willi Food International Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -61.17%. Given that G. Willi Food International Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shufersal Ltd., analysts believe G. Willi Food International Ltd. is more attractive than Shufersal Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0 0 0 WILCG. Willi Food International Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SHUFF or WILC More Risky?
Shufersal Ltd. has a beta of -0.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G. Willi Food International Ltd. has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.733%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHUFF or WILC?
Shufersal Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.83%. G. Willi Food International Ltd. offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Shufersal Ltd. pays 54.67% of its earnings as a dividend. G. Willi Food International Ltd. pays out 14.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHUFF or WILC?
Shufersal Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than G. Willi Food International Ltd. quarterly revenues of $45.5M. Shufersal Ltd.'s net income of $50M is higher than G. Willi Food International Ltd.'s net income of $5.7M. Notably, Shufersal Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while G. Willi Food International Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shufersal Ltd. is 0.41x versus 2.15x for G. Willi Food International Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHUFFShufersal Ltd.0.41x 9.06x $1.1B $50M WILCG. Willi Food International Ltd.2.15x 13.64x $45.5M $5.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 65.66% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.94% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 4.41% over the past day.
