CTGL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridgford Foods Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Citrine Global Corp.'s net margin of -3.15%. Citrine Global Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Bridgford Foods Corp.'s return on equity of -5.79%.

Citrine Global Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bridgford Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Citrine Global Corp. has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods Corp., analysts believe Citrine Global Corp. is more attractive than Bridgford Foods Corp..

Citrine Global Corp. has a beta of 23.709, which suggesting that the stock is 2270.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridgford Foods Corp. has a beta of -0.249, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.925%.

Citrine Global Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridgford Foods Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citrine Global Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgford Foods Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citrine Global Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bridgford Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $52M. Citrine Global Corp.'s net income of -$386K is higher than Bridgford Foods Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Citrine Global Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bridgford Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 62.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citrine Global Corp. is -- versus 0.31x for Bridgford Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Citrine Global Corp.'s net margin of -3.52%. Citrine Global Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

Citrine Global Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 244.47%. Given that Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has higher upside potential than Citrine Global Corp., analysts believe Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. is more attractive than Citrine Global Corp..

Citrine Global Corp. has a beta of 23.709, which suggesting that the stock is 2270.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Citrine Global Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citrine Global Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citrine Global Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3M. Citrine Global Corp.'s net income of -$386K is higher than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s net income of -$712.4K. Notably, Citrine Global Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citrine Global Corp. is -- versus 0.05x for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Citrine Global Corp.'s net margin of -7.56%. Citrine Global Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38%.

Citrine Global Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Laird Superfood, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 307.88%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than Citrine Global Corp., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than Citrine Global Corp..

Citrine Global Corp. has a beta of 23.709, which suggesting that the stock is 2270.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.079%.

Citrine Global Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citrine Global Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citrine Global Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.9M. Citrine Global Corp.'s net income of -$386K is higher than Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K. Notably, Citrine Global Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laird Superfood, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citrine Global Corp. is -- versus 0.51x for Laird Superfood, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ODDITY Tech Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Citrine Global Corp.'s net margin of 12%. Citrine Global Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat ODDITY Tech Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.32%.

Citrine Global Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ODDITY Tech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $67.55 which suggests that it could grow by 49.14%. Given that ODDITY Tech Ltd. has higher upside potential than Citrine Global Corp., analysts believe ODDITY Tech Ltd. is more attractive than Citrine Global Corp..

Citrine Global Corp. has a beta of 23.709, which suggesting that the stock is 2270.924% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ODDITY Tech Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Citrine Global Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ODDITY Tech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citrine Global Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ODDITY Tech Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citrine Global Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ODDITY Tech Ltd. quarterly revenues of $147.9M. Citrine Global Corp.'s net income of -$386K is lower than ODDITY Tech Ltd.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Citrine Global Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ODDITY Tech Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citrine Global Corp. is -- versus 3.57x for ODDITY Tech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.