SHKLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of -- compared to Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s net margin of 0.04%. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s return on equity of 13.34% beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.43%.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.31%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than Sinotruk (Hong Kong), analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than Sinotruk (Hong Kong).

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.216%.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a quarterly dividend of $4.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.15%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinotruk (Hong Kong) pays 15.27% of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s net income of -- is lower than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of $17.7K. Notably, Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.89x while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 8.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinotruk (Hong Kong) is 0.53x versus 0.45x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EHang Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s net margin of -37.51%. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s return on equity of 13.34% beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77%.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.29 which suggests that it could grow by 51.89%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than Sinotruk (Hong Kong), analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than Sinotruk (Hong Kong).

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.982%.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a quarterly dividend of $4.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.15%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinotruk (Hong Kong) pays 15.27% of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.9M. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s net income of -- is lower than EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.89x while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinotruk (Hong Kong) is 0.53x versus 21.46x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s net margin of --. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s return on equity of 13.34% beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1365.38%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than Sinotruk (Hong Kong), analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than Sinotruk (Hong Kong).

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.603%.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a quarterly dividend of $4.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.15%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinotruk (Hong Kong) pays 15.27% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s net income of -- is lower than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.89x while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 1.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinotruk (Hong Kong) is 0.53x versus 0.05x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s net margin of --. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s return on equity of 13.34% beat MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MingZhu Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe Sinotruk (Hong Kong) is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) has a quarterly dividend of $4.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.15%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinotruk (Hong Kong) pays 15.27% of its earnings as a dividend. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sinotruk (Hong Kong) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s net income of -- is lower than MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Sinotruk (Hong Kong)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.89x while MingZhu Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinotruk (Hong Kong) is 0.53x versus 0.06x for MingZhu Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.