SGSOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS SA's net margin of 0.25%. SGS SA's return on equity of -- beat Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's return on equity of 1.02%.

SGS SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of $15.75 which suggests that it could grow by 24.8%. Given that Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS SA, analysts believe Aebi Schmidt Holding AG is more attractive than SGS SA.

SGS SA has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SGS SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. SGS SA pays 103.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Aebi Schmidt Holding AG pays out -10.49% of its earnings as a dividend.

SGS SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG quarterly revenues of $471.3M. SGS SA's net income of -- is lower than Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's net income of $1.2M. Notably, SGS SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.46x while Aebi Schmidt Holding AG's PE ratio is 29.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS SA is 2.69x versus 0.59x for Aebi Schmidt Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kühne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS SA's net margin of 3.41%. SGS SA's return on equity of -- beat Kühne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 40.69%.

SGS SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kühne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS SA has higher upside potential than Kühne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe SGS SA is more attractive than Kühne + Nagel International AG.

SGS SA has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kühne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.095%.

SGS SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Kühne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.96 per share. SGS SA pays 103.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Kühne + Nagel International AG pays out 53.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Kühne + Nagel International AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS SA's is not.

SGS SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kühne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.6B. SGS SA's net income of -- is lower than Kühne + Nagel International AG's net income of $257.4M. Notably, SGS SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.46x while Kühne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 20.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS SA is 2.69x versus 0.81x for Kühne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schindler Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS SA's net margin of 8.89%. SGS SA's return on equity of -- beat Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 21.19%.

SGS SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schindler Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS SA has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe SGS SA is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.

SGS SA has a beta of 0.494, which suggesting that the stock is 50.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.798%.

SGS SA has a quarterly dividend of $3.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Schindler Holding AG offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.81 per share. SGS SA pays 103.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG pays out 67.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS SA's is not.

SGS SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues of $3.3B. SGS SA's net income of -- is lower than Schindler Holding AG's net income of $296.5M. Notably, SGS SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.46x while Schindler Holding AG's PE ratio is 33.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS SA is 2.69x versus 3.01x for Schindler Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.