SGBAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mega Matrix, Inc. has a net margin of -11.79% compared to SES SA's net margin of -26.8%. SES SA's return on equity of 0.37% beat Mega Matrix, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.45%.

SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mega Matrix, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 62.5%. Given that Mega Matrix, Inc. has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe Mega Matrix, Inc. is more attractive than SES SA.

SES SA has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Matrix, Inc. has a beta of 2.683, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.269%.

SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.11%. Mega Matrix, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES SA pays -2666.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Matrix, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES SA quarterly revenues are $560.7M, which are larger than Mega Matrix, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.3M. SES SA's net income of -$66.1M is lower than Mega Matrix, Inc.'s net income of -$2.8M. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,345.05x while Mega Matrix, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 1.13x versus 1.27x for Mega Matrix, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTL Group SA has a net margin of -11.79% compared to SES SA's net margin of --. SES SA's return on equity of 0.37% beat RTL Group SA's return on equity of 7.19%.

SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RTL Group SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SES SA has higher upside potential than RTL Group SA, analysts believe SES SA is more attractive than RTL Group SA.

SES SA has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTL Group SA has a beta of 0.271, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.871%.

SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.11%. RTL Group SA offers a yield of 6.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. SES SA pays -2666.66% of its earnings as a dividend. RTL Group SA pays out 57.03% of its earnings as a dividend. RTL Group SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SES SA quarterly revenues are $560.7M, which are larger than RTL Group SA quarterly revenues of --. SES SA's net income of -$66.1M is higher than RTL Group SA's net income of --. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,345.05x while RTL Group SA's PE ratio is 16.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 1.13x versus 0.95x for RTL Group SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spotify Technology SA has a net margin of -11.79% compared to SES SA's net margin of 21.04%. SES SA's return on equity of 0.37% beat Spotify Technology SA's return on equity of 22.88%.

SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spotify Technology SA has an analysts' consensus of $756.18 which suggests that it could grow by 34.8%. Given that Spotify Technology SA has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe Spotify Technology SA is more attractive than SES SA.

SES SA has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spotify Technology SA has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.629%.

SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.11%. Spotify Technology SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES SA pays -2666.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Spotify Technology SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES SA quarterly revenues are $560.7M, which are smaller than Spotify Technology SA quarterly revenues of $5B. SES SA's net income of -$66.1M is lower than Spotify Technology SA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,345.05x while Spotify Technology SA's PE ratio is 87.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 1.13x versus 6.26x for Spotify Technology SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Millicom International Cellular SA has a net margin of -11.79% compared to SES SA's net margin of 14.37%. SES SA's return on equity of 0.37% beat Millicom International Cellular SA's return on equity of 32.9%.

SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Millicom International Cellular SA has an analysts' consensus of $52.35 which suggests that it could grow by 0.91%. Given that Millicom International Cellular SA has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe Millicom International Cellular SA is more attractive than SES SA.

SES SA has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.431% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Millicom International Cellular SA has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.321%.

SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.11%. Millicom International Cellular SA offers a yield of 6.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. SES SA pays -2666.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Millicom International Cellular SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES SA quarterly revenues are $560.7M, which are smaller than Millicom International Cellular SA quarterly revenues of $1.4B. SES SA's net income of -$66.1M is lower than Millicom International Cellular SA's net income of $204M. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,345.05x while Millicom International Cellular SA's PE ratio is 7.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 1.13x versus 1.57x for Millicom International Cellular SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.