Financhill
Buy
56

SGBAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$7.71
Seasonality move :
0.55%
Day range:
$8.20 - $8.20
52-week range:
$3.84 - $8.60
Dividend yield:
6.99%
P/E ratio:
2,345.05x
P/S ratio:
1.48x
P/B ratio:
1.47x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
2.3K
1-year change:
107.59%
Market cap:
$3.4B
Revenue:
$2.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.14

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SGBAF
SES SA
-- -- -- -- --
RGLXY
RTL Group SA
-- -- -- -- --
SATS
EchoStar Corp.
$3.7B -$0.65 -6.32% -31.47% $124.29
SPOT
Spotify Technology SA
$5.4B $3.38 21.92% 211.57% $663.76
TIGO
Millicom International Cellular SA
$1.5B $0.74 24.59% 35.27% $57.98
TIMB
TIM SA (Brazil)
$1.3B $0.42 14.47% 26.02% $23.66
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SGBAF
SES SA
$8.20 -- $3.4B 2,345.05x $0.29 6.99% 1.48x
RGLXY
RTL Group SA
$4.18 -- $6.5B 16.91x $0.27 6.56% 0.97x
SATS
EchoStar Corp.
$110.06 $124.29 $31.7B -- $0.00 0% 2.08x
SPOT
Spotify Technology SA
$487.17 $663.76 $100.3B 50.49x $0.00 0% 5.28x
TIGO
Millicom International Cellular SA
$64.57 $57.98 $10.8B 9.92x $0.75 4.65% 1.96x
TIMB
TIM SA (Brazil)
$27.11 $23.66 $13.1B 18.48x $0.84 5.71% 2.84x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SGBAF
SES SA
56.91% -1.013 -- 2.56x
RGLXY
RTL Group SA
26.75% -0.579 -- 0.63x
SATS
EchoStar Corp.
81.48% 2.743 138.85% 0.53x
SPOT
Spotify Technology SA
19.02% 1.046 1.92% 1.64x
TIGO
Millicom International Cellular SA
71.63% -0.787 113.59% 0.68x
TIMB
TIM SA (Brazil)
39.35% -0.149 31.85% 0.83x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SGBAF
SES SA
-- $19.2M 0.21% 0.37% 10.46% $119.5M
RGLXY
RTL Group SA
-- -- 5.63% 7.19% -- --
SATS
EchoStar Corp.
$480.1M -$160.4M -27.55% -74.8% -4.44% -$144.4M
SPOT
Spotify Technology SA
$1.7B $815.9M 24.94% 32.63% 15.47% $1B
TIGO
Millicom International Cellular SA
$791M $379M 10.45% 32.9% 26.69% $299M
TIMB
TIM SA (Brazil)
$636.8M $315.6M 9.63% 15.67% 25.62% $498.6M

SES SA vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SGBAF or RGLXY?

    RTL Group SA has a net margin of -11.79% compared to SES SA's net margin of --. SES SA's return on equity of 0.37% beat RTL Group SA's return on equity of 7.19%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    -- -$0.16 $8.3B
    RGLXY
    RTL Group SA
    -- -- $7.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About SGBAF or RGLXY?

    SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RTL Group SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SES SA has higher upside potential than RTL Group SA, analysts believe SES SA is more attractive than RTL Group SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    0 0 0
    RGLXY
    RTL Group SA
    0 0 0
  • Is SGBAF or RGLXY More Risky?

    SES SA has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.823% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTL Group SA has a beta of 0.238, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.234%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SGBAF or RGLXY?

    SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. RTL Group SA offers a yield of 6.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. SES SA pays -2666.66% of its earnings as a dividend. RTL Group SA pays out 57.03% of its earnings as a dividend. RTL Group SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SGBAF or RGLXY?

    SES SA quarterly revenues are $560.7M, which are larger than RTL Group SA quarterly revenues of --. SES SA's net income of -$66.1M is higher than RTL Group SA's net income of --. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,345.05x while RTL Group SA's PE ratio is 16.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 1.48x versus 0.97x for RTL Group SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    1.48x 2,345.05x $560.7M -$66.1M
    RGLXY
    RTL Group SA
    0.97x 16.91x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SGBAF or SATS?

    EchoStar Corp. has a net margin of -11.79% compared to SES SA's net margin of -353.64%. SES SA's return on equity of 0.37% beat EchoStar Corp.'s return on equity of -74.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    -- -$0.16 $8.3B
    SATS
    EchoStar Corp.
    13.28% -$44.37 $37.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About SGBAF or SATS?

    SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EchoStar Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $124.29 which suggests that it could grow by 12.93%. Given that EchoStar Corp. has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe EchoStar Corp. is more attractive than SES SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    0 0 0
    SATS
    EchoStar Corp.
    3 4 0
  • Is SGBAF or SATS More Risky?

    SES SA has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.823% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EchoStar Corp. has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.046%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SGBAF or SATS?

    SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. EchoStar Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES SA pays -2666.66% of its earnings as a dividend. EchoStar Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SGBAF or SATS?

    SES SA quarterly revenues are $560.7M, which are smaller than EchoStar Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. SES SA's net income of -$66.1M is higher than EchoStar Corp.'s net income of -$12.8B. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,345.05x while EchoStar Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 1.48x versus 2.08x for EchoStar Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    1.48x 2,345.05x $560.7M -$66.1M
    SATS
    EchoStar Corp.
    2.08x -- $3.6B -$12.8B
  • Which has Higher Returns SGBAF or SPOT?

    Spotify Technology SA has a net margin of -11.79% compared to SES SA's net margin of 25.91%. SES SA's return on equity of 0.37% beat Spotify Technology SA's return on equity of 32.63%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    -- -$0.16 $8.3B
    SPOT
    Spotify Technology SA
    33% $5.16 $12.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About SGBAF or SPOT?

    SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spotify Technology SA has an analysts' consensus of $663.76 which suggests that it could grow by 38.74%. Given that Spotify Technology SA has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe Spotify Technology SA is more attractive than SES SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    0 0 0
    SPOT
    Spotify Technology SA
    24 8 0
  • Is SGBAF or SPOT More Risky?

    SES SA has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.823% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spotify Technology SA has a beta of 1.657, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.675%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SGBAF or SPOT?

    SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. Spotify Technology SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES SA pays -2666.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Spotify Technology SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SGBAF or SPOT?

    SES SA quarterly revenues are $560.7M, which are smaller than Spotify Technology SA quarterly revenues of $5.3B. SES SA's net income of -$66.1M is lower than Spotify Technology SA's net income of $1.4B. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,345.05x while Spotify Technology SA's PE ratio is 50.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 1.48x versus 5.28x for Spotify Technology SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    1.48x 2,345.05x $560.7M -$66.1M
    SPOT
    Spotify Technology SA
    5.28x 50.49x $5.3B $1.4B
  • Which has Higher Returns SGBAF or TIGO?

    Millicom International Cellular SA has a net margin of -11.79% compared to SES SA's net margin of 14.37%. SES SA's return on equity of 0.37% beat Millicom International Cellular SA's return on equity of 32.9%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    -- -$0.16 $8.3B
    TIGO
    Millicom International Cellular SA
    55.7% $1.16 $11.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About SGBAF or TIGO?

    SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Millicom International Cellular SA has an analysts' consensus of $57.98 which suggests that it could fall by -10.21%. Given that Millicom International Cellular SA has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe Millicom International Cellular SA is more attractive than SES SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    0 0 0
    TIGO
    Millicom International Cellular SA
    3 3 0
  • Is SGBAF or TIGO More Risky?

    SES SA has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.823% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Millicom International Cellular SA has a beta of 0.929, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.144%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SGBAF or TIGO?

    SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. Millicom International Cellular SA offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. SES SA pays -2666.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Millicom International Cellular SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SGBAF or TIGO?

    SES SA quarterly revenues are $560.7M, which are smaller than Millicom International Cellular SA quarterly revenues of $1.4B. SES SA's net income of -$66.1M is lower than Millicom International Cellular SA's net income of $204M. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,345.05x while Millicom International Cellular SA's PE ratio is 9.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 1.48x versus 1.96x for Millicom International Cellular SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    1.48x 2,345.05x $560.7M -$66.1M
    TIGO
    Millicom International Cellular SA
    1.96x 9.92x $1.4B $204M
  • Which has Higher Returns SGBAF or TIMB?

    TIM SA (Brazil) has a net margin of -11.79% compared to SES SA's net margin of 18%. SES SA's return on equity of 0.37% beat TIM SA (Brazil)'s return on equity of 15.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    -- -$0.16 $8.3B
    TIMB
    TIM SA (Brazil)
    51.7% $0.46 $7.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About SGBAF or TIMB?

    SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TIM SA (Brazil) has an analysts' consensus of $23.66 which suggests that it could fall by -12.72%. Given that TIM SA (Brazil) has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe TIM SA (Brazil) is more attractive than SES SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    0 0 0
    TIMB
    TIM SA (Brazil)
    1 4 0
  • Is SGBAF or TIMB More Risky?

    SES SA has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.823% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TIM SA (Brazil) has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.618%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SGBAF or TIMB?

    SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.99%. TIM SA (Brazil) offers a yield of 5.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. SES SA pays -2666.66% of its earnings as a dividend. TIM SA (Brazil) pays out 92.44% of its earnings as a dividend. TIM SA (Brazil)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SGBAF or TIMB?

    SES SA quarterly revenues are $560.7M, which are smaller than TIM SA (Brazil) quarterly revenues of $1.2B. SES SA's net income of -$66.1M is lower than TIM SA (Brazil)'s net income of $221.7M. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,345.05x while TIM SA (Brazil)'s PE ratio is 18.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 1.48x versus 2.84x for TIM SA (Brazil). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SGBAF
    SES SA
    1.48x 2,345.05x $560.7M -$66.1M
    TIMB
    TIM SA (Brazil)
    2.84x 18.48x $1.2B $221.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x

Alerts

Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12

Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.

Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12

Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.

Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12

Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock