SGBAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mega Matrix has a net margin of 0.81% compared to SES SA's net margin of -26.8%. SES SA's return on equity of -18.77% beat Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45%.

SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mega Matrix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.43%. Given that Mega Matrix has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe Mega Matrix is more attractive than SES SA.

SES SA has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.256% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Matrix has a beta of 2.911, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.071%.

SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 26.45%. Mega Matrix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES SA pays -24.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Matrix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES SA quarterly revenues are $546.6M, which are larger than Mega Matrix quarterly revenues of $10.3M. SES SA's net income of $4.4M is higher than Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mega Matrix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 0.73x versus 2.41x for Mega Matrix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTL Group SA has a net margin of 0.81% compared to SES SA's net margin of --. SES SA's return on equity of -18.77% beat RTL Group SA's return on equity of 10.71%.

SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RTL Group SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SES SA has higher upside potential than RTL Group SA, analysts believe SES SA is more attractive than RTL Group SA.

SES SA has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.256% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTL Group SA has a beta of 0.396, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.362%.

SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 26.45%. RTL Group SA offers a yield of 12.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. SES SA pays -24.31% of its earnings as a dividend. RTL Group SA pays out 149.04% of its earnings as a dividend.

SES SA quarterly revenues are $546.6M, which are larger than RTL Group SA quarterly revenues of --. SES SA's net income of $4.4M is higher than RTL Group SA's net income of --. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RTL Group SA's PE ratio is 6.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 0.73x versus 0.56x for RTL Group SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spotify Technology SA has a net margin of 0.81% compared to SES SA's net margin of 7.52%. SES SA's return on equity of -18.77% beat Spotify Technology SA's return on equity of 20.79%.

SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spotify Technology SA has an analysts' consensus of $472.38 which suggests that it could grow by 2.5%. Given that Spotify Technology SA has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe Spotify Technology SA is more attractive than SES SA.

SES SA has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.256% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spotify Technology SA has a beta of 1.609, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.913%.

SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 26.45%. Spotify Technology SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES SA pays -24.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Spotify Technology SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES SA quarterly revenues are $546.6M, which are smaller than Spotify Technology SA quarterly revenues of $4.4B. SES SA's net income of $4.4M is lower than Spotify Technology SA's net income of $329.9M. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spotify Technology SA's PE ratio is 124.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 0.73x versus 5.72x for Spotify Technology SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Millicom International Cellular SA has a net margin of 0.81% compared to SES SA's net margin of 3.56%. SES SA's return on equity of -18.77% beat Millicom International Cellular SA's return on equity of 4.42%.

SES SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Millicom International Cellular SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.84%. Given that Millicom International Cellular SA has higher upside potential than SES SA, analysts believe Millicom International Cellular SA is more attractive than SES SA.

SES SA has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.256% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Millicom International Cellular SA has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.38%.

SES SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 26.45%. Millicom International Cellular SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES SA pays -24.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Millicom International Cellular SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES SA quarterly revenues are $546.6M, which are smaller than Millicom International Cellular SA quarterly revenues of $1.4B. SES SA's net income of $4.4M is lower than Millicom International Cellular SA's net income of $51M. Notably, SES SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Millicom International Cellular SA's PE ratio is 26.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES SA is 0.73x versus 0.72x for Millicom International Cellular SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.