SEBYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a net margin of -- compared to SEB SA's net margin of --. SEB SA's return on equity of 12.25% beat Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's return on equity of 21.98%.

SEB SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has higher upside potential than SEB SA, analysts believe Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE is more attractive than SEB SA.

SEB SA has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.134% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.085%.

SEB SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. SEB SA pays 50.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE pays out 41.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEB SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE quarterly revenues of --. SEB SA's net income of -- is lower than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's net income of --. Notably, SEB SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.22x while Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's PE ratio is 22.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEB SA is 0.57x versus 3.59x for Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Michelin has a net margin of -- compared to SEB SA's net margin of --. SEB SA's return on equity of 12.25% beat Michelin's return on equity of 10.73%.

SEB SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Michelin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SEB SA has higher upside potential than Michelin, analysts believe SEB SA is more attractive than Michelin.

SEB SA has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.134% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Michelin has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.196%.

SEB SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Michelin offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. SEB SA pays 50.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Michelin pays out 45.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEB SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Michelin quarterly revenues of --. SEB SA's net income of -- is lower than Michelin's net income of --. Notably, SEB SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.22x while Michelin's PE ratio is 11.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEB SA is 0.57x versus 0.80x for Michelin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kering SA has a net margin of -- compared to SEB SA's net margin of --. SEB SA's return on equity of 12.25% beat Kering SA's return on equity of 13.08%.

SEB SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kering SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SEB SA has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe SEB SA is more attractive than Kering SA.

SEB SA has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.134% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kering SA has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.81%.

SEB SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Kering SA offers a yield of 6.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. SEB SA pays 50.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Kering SA pays out 57.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEB SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kering SA quarterly revenues of --. SEB SA's net income of -- is lower than Kering SA's net income of --. Notably, SEB SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.22x while Kering SA's PE ratio is 13.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEB SA is 0.57x versus 1.52x for Kering SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valeo SA has a net margin of -- compared to SEB SA's net margin of --. SEB SA's return on equity of 12.25% beat Valeo SA's return on equity of 5.51%.

SEB SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Valeo SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 59.39%. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than SEB SA, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than SEB SA.

SEB SA has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.134% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valeo SA has a beta of 1.666, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.632%.

SEB SA has a quarterly dividend of $2.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Valeo SA offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. SEB SA pays 50.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SA pays out 41.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEB SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valeo SA quarterly revenues of --. SEB SA's net income of -- is lower than Valeo SA's net income of --. Notably, SEB SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.22x while Valeo SA's PE ratio is 8.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEB SA is 0.57x versus 0.10x for Valeo SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.