Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
36
SCHYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.18
Seasonality move
:
-8.77%
Day range:
$2.15 - $2.39
52-week range:
$1.65 - $3.14
Dividend yield:
1.33%
P/E ratio:
19.65x
P/S ratio:
3.85x
P/B ratio:
18.60x
Volume:
1.6K
Avg. volume:
11.4K
1-year change:
4.57%
Market cap:
$19.4B
Revenue:
$4.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCHYF
Sands China Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
$3.3B | $0.76 | 4.98% | 15.82% | $69.87 |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $0.08 | 7.2% | 2.7% | $9.13 |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCHYF
Sands China Ltd.
|
$2.18 | -- | $19.4B | 19.65x | $0.03 | 1.33% | 3.85x |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
$54.34 | $69.87 | $36.5B | 23.12x | $0.30 | 1.93% | 2.89x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$5.68 | $9.13 | $2.2B | 12.03x | $0.00 | 11.62% | 0.43x |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
$2.89 | -- | $598.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.86x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.27 | -- | $1.9B | 4,982.35x | $0.00 | 14.25% | 0.90x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCHYF
Sands China Ltd.
|
88.59% | 1.570 | -- | 0.72x |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
90.95% | 1.178 | 36.07% | 1.14x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
121.57% | 2.127 | 212.98% | 1.07x |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
79.56% | 1.863 | 278.06% | 0.62x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
65.52% | 2.347 | -- | 0.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCHYF
Sands China Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.18% | 201.74% | -- | -- |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
$1.4B | $875M | 10.65% | 76% | 23.98% | $930M |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$326.9M | $139.2M | 2.26% | -- | 10.72% | -- |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
$56.3M | $7.8M | -2.35% | -10.64% | 4.86% | -- |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.01% | 0.03% | -- | -- |
Sands China Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SCHYF or LVS?
Las Vegas Sands Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Sands China Ltd.'s net margin of 12.28%. Sands China Ltd.'s return on equity of 201.74% beat Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s return on equity of 76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCHYFSands China Ltd.-- -- $9B LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.37.96% $0.58 $17.9B -
What do Analysts Say About SCHYF or LVS?
Sands China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $69.87 which suggests that it could grow by 28.59%. Given that Las Vegas Sands Corp. has higher upside potential than Sands China Ltd., analysts believe Las Vegas Sands Corp. is more attractive than Sands China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCHYFSands China Ltd.0 0 0 LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.13 5 0 -
Is SCHYF or LVS More Risky?
Sands China Ltd. has a beta of -0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 107.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands Corp. has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.504%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCHYF or LVS?
Sands China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Las Vegas Sands Corp. offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Sands China Ltd. pays 86.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands Corp. pays out 42.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCHYF or LVS?
Sands China Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Las Vegas Sands Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Sands China Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s net income of $448M. Notably, Sands China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.65x while Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sands China Ltd. is 3.85x versus 2.89x for Las Vegas Sands Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCHYFSands China Ltd.3.85x 19.65x -- -- LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.2.89x 23.12x $3.6B $448M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCHYF or MLCO?
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sands China Ltd.'s net margin of 3.58%. Sands China Ltd.'s return on equity of 201.74% beat Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCHYFSands China Ltd.-- -- $9B MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.25.17% $0.15 $6.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SCHYF or MLCO?
Sands China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.13 which suggests that it could grow by 60.82%. Given that Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sands China Ltd., analysts believe Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. is more attractive than Sands China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCHYFSands China Ltd.0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.6 4 0 -
Is SCHYF or MLCO More Risky?
Sands China Ltd. has a beta of -0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 107.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.258%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCHYF or MLCO?
Sands China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. offers a yield of 11.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sands China Ltd. pays 86.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sands China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCHYF or MLCO?
Sands China Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Sands China Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s net income of $46.5M. Notably, Sands China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.65x while Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sands China Ltd. is 3.85x versus 0.43x for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCHYFSands China Ltd.3.85x 19.65x -- -- MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.0.43x 12.03x $1.3B $46.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCHYF or MSC?
Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sands China Ltd.'s net margin of -13.98%. Sands China Ltd.'s return on equity of 201.74% beat Studio City International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -10.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCHYFSands China Ltd.-- -- $9B MSCStudio City International Holdings Ltd.35.11% -$0.11 $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About SCHYF or MSC?
Sands China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 280.62%. Given that Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sands China Ltd., analysts believe Studio City International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Sands China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCHYFSands China Ltd.0 0 0 MSCStudio City International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SCHYF or MSC More Risky?
Sands China Ltd. has a beta of -0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 107.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.072, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.844%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCHYF or MSC?
Sands China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Studio City International Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sands China Ltd. pays 86.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Studio City International Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sands China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCHYF or MSC?
Sands China Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Studio City International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $160.3M. Sands China Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Studio City International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$22.4M. Notably, Sands China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.65x while Studio City International Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sands China Ltd. is 3.85x versus 0.86x for Studio City International Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCHYFSands China Ltd.3.85x 19.65x -- -- MSCStudio City International Holdings Ltd.0.86x -- $160.3M -$22.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCHYF or SJMHF?
SJM Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sands China Ltd.'s net margin of 1.44%. Sands China Ltd.'s return on equity of 201.74% beat SJM Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCHYFSands China Ltd.-- -- $9B SJMHFSJM Holdings Ltd.-- $0.00 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SCHYF or SJMHF?
Sands China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SJM Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sands China Ltd. has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Sands China Ltd. is more attractive than SJM Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCHYFSands China Ltd.0 0 0 SJMHFSJM Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SCHYF or SJMHF More Risky?
Sands China Ltd. has a beta of -0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 107.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJM Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.696, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.363%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCHYF or SJMHF?
Sands China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. SJM Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 14.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sands China Ltd. pays 86.9% of its earnings as a dividend. SJM Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sands China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCHYF or SJMHF?
Sands China Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SJM Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $896.8M. Sands China Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than SJM Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $12.9M. Notably, Sands China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.65x while SJM Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4,982.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sands China Ltd. is 3.85x versus 0.90x for SJM Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCHYFSands China Ltd.3.85x 19.65x -- -- SJMHFSJM Holdings Ltd.0.90x 4,982.35x $896.8M $12.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
