Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
48
SCHYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.60
Seasonality move
:
-2.74%
Day range:
$2.26 - $2.60
52-week range:
$1.65 - $3.14
Dividend yield:
1.13%
P/E ratio:
24.86x
P/S ratio:
5.22x
P/B ratio:
18.60x
Volume:
1.1K
Avg. volume:
969
1-year change:
14.82%
Market cap:
$22.8B
Revenue:
$4.4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCHYF
Sands China Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
$3.1B | $0.62 | 14.37% | 68.76% | $68.08 |
|
MGM
MGM Resorts International
|
$4.2B | $0.30 | 1.64% | -9.07% | $42.33 |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $0.09 | 8.77% | 42.63% | $10.92 |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WYNN
Wynn Resorts Ltd.
|
$1.8B | $1.15 | 0.39% | -36.26% | $144.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCHYF
Sands China Ltd.
|
$2.82 | -- | $22.8B | 24.86x | $0.03 | 1.13% | 5.22x |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
$65.64 | $68.08 | $44.4B | 29.62x | $0.25 | 1.52% | 3.77x |
|
MGM
MGM Resorts International
|
$37.16 | $42.33 | $10.2B | 233.27x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.61x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$7.83 | $10.92 | $3.1B | 29.78x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.63x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.30 | -- | $2.1B | 4,982.35x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.92x |
|
WYNN
Wynn Resorts Ltd.
|
$122.27 | $144.50 | $12.7B | 26.97x | $0.25 | 0.82% | 1.81x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCHYF
Sands China Ltd.
|
88.59% | 1.951 | -- | 0.72x |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
90.94% | 1.626 | 42.9% | 0.88x |
|
MGM
MGM Resorts International
|
92.18% | 0.991 | 308.72% | 1.01x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
120.74% | 2.067 | 193.76% | 1.00x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
65.52% | 1.088 | -- | 0.36x |
|
WYNN
Wynn Resorts Ltd.
|
103.13% | 1.406 | 97.06% | 1.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SCHYF
Sands China Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.18% | 201.74% | -- | -- |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
$1.3B | $794M | 10.36% | 64.69% | 23.84% | $886M |
|
MGM
MGM Resorts International
|
$1.6B | $219.4M | 1.06% | 10.22% | 5.16% | $475.1M |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$375.8M | $192.2M | 0.91% | -- | 14.66% | -- |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.01% | 0.03% | -- | -- |
|
WYNN
Wynn Resorts Ltd.
|
$603.5M | $317.8M | 5.37% | -- | 17.33% | $171.7M |
Sands China Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SCHYF or LVS?
Las Vegas Sands Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Sands China Ltd.'s net margin of 14.74%. Sands China Ltd.'s return on equity of 201.74% beat Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s return on equity of 64.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCHYFSands China Ltd.-- -- $9B LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.38.13% $0.61 $17.6B -
What do Analysts Say About SCHYF or LVS?
Sands China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $68.08 which suggests that it could grow by 3.71%. Given that Las Vegas Sands Corp. has higher upside potential than Sands China Ltd., analysts believe Las Vegas Sands Corp. is more attractive than Sands China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCHYFSands China Ltd.0 0 0 LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.13 5 0 -
Is SCHYF or LVS More Risky?
Sands China Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands Corp. has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.483%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCHYF or LVS?
Sands China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Las Vegas Sands Corp. offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Sands China Ltd. pays 24.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands Corp. pays out 40.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCHYF or LVS?
Sands China Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Las Vegas Sands Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Sands China Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s net income of $491M. Notably, Sands China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s PE ratio is 29.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sands China Ltd. is 5.22x versus 3.77x for Las Vegas Sands Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCHYFSands China Ltd.5.22x 24.86x -- -- LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.3.77x 29.62x $3.3B $491M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCHYF or MGM?
MGM Resorts International has a net margin of -- compared to Sands China Ltd.'s net margin of -4.86%. Sands China Ltd.'s return on equity of 201.74% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 10.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCHYFSands China Ltd.-- -- $9B MGMMGM Resorts International37.29% -$1.05 $35B -
What do Analysts Say About SCHYF or MGM?
Sands China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MGM Resorts International has an analysts' consensus of $42.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.92%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Sands China Ltd., analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Sands China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCHYFSands China Ltd.0 0 0 MGMMGM Resorts International10 9 2 -
Is SCHYF or MGM More Risky?
Sands China Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.477, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.71%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCHYF or MGM?
Sands China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. MGM Resorts International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sands China Ltd. pays 24.81% of its earnings as a dividend. MGM Resorts International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sands China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCHYF or MGM?
Sands China Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Sands China Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than MGM Resorts International's net income of -$206.7M. Notably, Sands China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while MGM Resorts International's PE ratio is 233.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sands China Ltd. is 5.22x versus 0.61x for MGM Resorts International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCHYFSands China Ltd.5.22x 24.86x -- -- MGMMGM Resorts International0.61x 233.27x $4.3B -$206.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCHYF or MLCO?
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sands China Ltd.'s net margin of 4.74%. Sands China Ltd.'s return on equity of 201.74% beat Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCHYFSands China Ltd.-- -- $9B MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.28.66% $0.19 $6.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SCHYF or MLCO?
Sands China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.92 which suggests that it could grow by 39.44%. Given that Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sands China Ltd., analysts believe Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. is more attractive than Sands China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCHYFSands China Ltd.0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.6 4 0 -
Is SCHYF or MLCO More Risky?
Sands China Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.922%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCHYF or MLCO?
Sands China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sands China Ltd. pays 24.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sands China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCHYF or MLCO?
Sands China Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Sands China Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s net income of $62.1M. Notably, Sands China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s PE ratio is 29.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sands China Ltd. is 5.22x versus 0.63x for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCHYFSands China Ltd.5.22x 24.86x -- -- MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.0.63x 29.78x $1.3B $62.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCHYF or SJMHF?
SJM Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sands China Ltd.'s net margin of 1.44%. Sands China Ltd.'s return on equity of 201.74% beat SJM Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCHYFSands China Ltd.-- -- $9B SJMHFSJM Holdings Ltd.-- $0.00 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SCHYF or SJMHF?
Sands China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SJM Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sands China Ltd. has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Sands China Ltd. is more attractive than SJM Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCHYFSands China Ltd.0 0 0 SJMHFSJM Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SCHYF or SJMHF More Risky?
Sands China Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJM Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.657, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.326%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCHYF or SJMHF?
Sands China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. SJM Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sands China Ltd. pays 24.81% of its earnings as a dividend. SJM Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sands China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCHYF or SJMHF?
Sands China Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SJM Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $896.8M. Sands China Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than SJM Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $12.9M. Notably, Sands China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while SJM Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4,982.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sands China Ltd. is 5.22x versus 0.92x for SJM Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCHYFSands China Ltd.5.22x 24.86x -- -- SJMHFSJM Holdings Ltd.0.92x 4,982.35x $896.8M $12.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SCHYF or WYNN?
Wynn Resorts Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sands China Ltd.'s net margin of 7%. Sands China Ltd.'s return on equity of 201.74% beat Wynn Resorts Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SCHYFSands China Ltd.-- -- $9B WYNNWynn Resorts Ltd.32.91% $0.85 $11.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SCHYF or WYNN?
Sands China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wynn Resorts Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $144.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.18%. Given that Wynn Resorts Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sands China Ltd., analysts believe Wynn Resorts Ltd. is more attractive than Sands China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SCHYFSands China Ltd.0 0 0 WYNNWynn Resorts Ltd.15 1 0 -
Is SCHYF or WYNN More Risky?
Sands China Ltd. has a beta of 0.037, which suggesting that the stock is 96.296% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts Ltd. has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.673%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SCHYF or WYNN?
Sands China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Wynn Resorts Ltd. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Sands China Ltd. pays 24.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts Ltd. pays out 22.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SCHYF or WYNN?
Sands China Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wynn Resorts Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Sands China Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Wynn Resorts Ltd.'s net income of $128.4M. Notably, Sands China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while Wynn Resorts Ltd.'s PE ratio is 26.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sands China Ltd. is 5.22x versus 1.81x for Wynn Resorts Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SCHYFSands China Ltd.5.22x 24.86x -- -- WYNNWynn Resorts Ltd.1.81x 26.97x $1.8B $128.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
