SJMHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MGM China Holdings has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of --. SJM Holdings's return on equity of -- beat MGM China Holdings's return on equity of --.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MGM China Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SJM Holdings has higher upside potential than MGM China Holdings, analysts believe SJM Holdings is more attractive than MGM China Holdings.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.156% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGM China Holdings has a beta of 0.220, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.024%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MGM China Holdings offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MGM China Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are larger than MGM China Holdings quarterly revenues of --. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than MGM China Holdings's net income of --. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MGM China Holdings's PE ratio is 8.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.39x versus 1.23x for MGM China Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of 2.32%. SJM Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $9.15 which suggests that it could grow by 63.1%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than SJM Holdings.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.156% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.707%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out -0.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $27.3M. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.39x versus 0.54x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Studio City International Holdings has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of -12.01%. SJM Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -12.62%.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Studio City International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 136.05%. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than SJM Holdings.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.156% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.383, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.285%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Studio City International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Studio City International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are larger than Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues of $174.6M. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$21M. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Studio City International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.39x versus 1.43x for Studio City International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sands China has a net margin of 1.44% compared to SJM Holdings's net margin of --. SJM Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Sands China's return on equity of --.

SJM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sands China has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SJM Holdings has higher upside potential than Sands China, analysts believe SJM Holdings is more attractive than Sands China.

SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.156% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sands China has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.401%.

SJM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sands China offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SJM Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sands China pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SJM Holdings quarterly revenues are $896.8M, which are larger than Sands China quarterly revenues of --. SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M is higher than Sands China's net income of --. Notably, SJM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sands China's PE ratio is 21.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SJM Holdings is 1.39x versus 2.88x for Sands China. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.