Is JetBlue The Best Airline Stock?
Following a general trend of improvement among airline stocks, shares…
Sell
43
RTBRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.82
Seasonality move
:
-1.33%
Day range:
$2.82 - $2.82
52-week range:
$1.49 - $2.99
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
22.98x
P/S ratio:
0.40x
P/B ratio:
1.10x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
168
1-year change:
79.62%
Market cap:
$351.8M
Revenue:
$891.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTBRF
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ALTB
Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BDL
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KTHUF
Kathmandu Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SKYZF
SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WHGPF
The Warehouse Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTBRF
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.
|
$2.82 | -- | $351.8M | 22.98x | $0.17 | 0% | 0.40x |
|
ALTB
Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.
|
$5.00 | -- | $5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 16,525.10x |
|
BDL
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
|
$29.00 | -- | $53.9M | 12.47x | $0.55 | 1.9% | 0.27x |
|
KTHUF
Kathmandu Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SKYZF
SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.
|
$0.58 | -- | $639.8M | 27.62x | $0.03 | 0% | 1.00x |
|
WHGPF
The Warehouse Group Ltd.
|
$0.54 | -- | $185.6M | -- | $0.03 | 0% | 0.10x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTBRF
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.
|
47.47% | 2.604 | -- | 0.26x |
|
ALTB
Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.
|
-- | -3.292 | -- | -- |
|
BDL
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
|
42.59% | 1.478 | 60.71% | 1.04x |
|
KTHUF
Kathmandu Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SKYZF
SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.
|
38.55% | -0.393 | -- | 0.55x |
|
WHGPF
The Warehouse Group Ltd.
|
69.76% | 1.159 | -- | 0.19x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTBRF
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.47% | 8.84% | -- | -- |
|
ALTB
Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BDL
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
|
$10.4M | $3M | 5.45% | 8.93% | 5.7% | -$1.8M |
|
KTHUF
Kathmandu Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SKYZF
SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.31% | 2.08% | -- | -- |
|
WHGPF
The Warehouse Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -2.29% | -6.1% | -- | -- |
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RTBRF or ALTB?
Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net margin of --. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.-- -- $337.3M ALTBAlpine Auto Brokers, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RTBRF or ALTB?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has higher upside potential than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc., analysts believe Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is more attractive than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0 0 0 ALTBAlpine Auto Brokers, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is RTBRF or ALTB More Risky?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.786% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. has a beta of 1.931, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.139%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTBRF or ALTB?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTBRF or ALTB?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.98x while Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is 0.40x versus 16,525.10x for Alpine Auto Brokers, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0.40x 22.98x -- -- ALTBAlpine Auto Brokers, Inc.16,525.10x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RTBRF or BDL?
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net margin of 4.77%. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.-- -- $337.3M BDLFlanigan's Enterprises, Inc.19.99% $0.75 $125.9M -
What do Analysts Say About RTBRF or BDL?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has higher upside potential than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is more attractive than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0 0 0 BDLFlanigan's Enterprises, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is RTBRF or BDL More Risky?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.786% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 0.291, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.945%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTBRF or BDL?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. pays out 27.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTBRF or BDL?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $52.2M. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.98x while Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is 0.40x versus 0.27x for Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0.40x 22.98x -- -- BDLFlanigan's Enterprises, Inc.0.27x 12.47x $52.2M $2.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns RTBRF or KTHUF?
Kathmandu Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net margin of --. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat Kathmandu Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.-- -- $337.3M KTHUFKathmandu Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RTBRF or KTHUF?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kathmandu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kathmandu Holdings, analysts believe Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is more attractive than Kathmandu Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0 0 0 KTHUFKathmandu Holdings0 0 0 -
Is RTBRF or KTHUF More Risky?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.786% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kathmandu Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTBRF or KTHUF?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kathmandu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kathmandu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTBRF or KTHUF?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kathmandu Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kathmandu Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.98x while Kathmandu Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is 0.40x versus -- for Kathmandu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0.40x 22.98x -- -- KTHUFKathmandu Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RTBRF or SKYZF?
SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net margin of --. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.-- -- $337.3M SKYZFSkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.-- -- $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About RTBRF or SKYZF?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has higher upside potential than SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd., analysts believe Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is more attractive than SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0 0 0 SKYZFSkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RTBRF or SKYZF More Risky?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.786% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.102, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.825%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTBRF or SKYZF?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTBRF or SKYZF?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.98x while SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is 0.40x versus 1.00x for SkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0.40x 22.98x -- -- SKYZFSkyCity Entertainment Group Ltd.1.00x 27.62x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RTBRF or WHGPF?
The Warehouse Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net margin of --. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.84% beat The Warehouse Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -6.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.-- -- $337.3M WHGPFThe Warehouse Group Ltd.-- -- $599.6M -
What do Analysts Say About RTBRF or WHGPF?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Warehouse Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has higher upside potential than The Warehouse Group Ltd., analysts believe Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is more attractive than The Warehouse Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0 0 0 WHGPFThe Warehouse Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RTBRF or WHGPF More Risky?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.786% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Warehouse Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.292, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTBRF or WHGPF?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Warehouse Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Warehouse Group Ltd. pays out -83.97% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTBRF or WHGPF?
Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Warehouse Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than The Warehouse Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.98x while The Warehouse Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd. is 0.40x versus 0.10x for The Warehouse Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTBRFRestaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd.0.40x 22.98x -- -- WHGPFThe Warehouse Group Ltd.0.10x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Netflix Buy Warner Bros?
Following a bidding war, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) has announced its intention…
Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
PLAB alert for Dec 10
Photronics, Inc. [PLAB] is up 45.35% over the past day.
Buy
60
OLMA alert for Dec 10
Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [OLMA] is up 15.35% over the past day.
Buy
84
TSAT alert for Dec 10
Telesat Corp. [TSAT] is up 3.07% over the past day.
