RSNHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 24.45% compared to Resona Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 19.08%. Resona Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.65% beat Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.46%.

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could fall by -4.74%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Resona Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Resona Holdings, Inc..

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.326, which suggesting that the stock is 132.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.340, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.962%.

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Resona Holdings, Inc. pays 27.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. pays out 32.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resona Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Resona Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $494.2M is lower than Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $2.7B. Notably, Resona Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.50x while Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resona Holdings, Inc. is 2.99x versus 1.65x for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 24.45% compared to Resona Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 24.1%. Resona Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.65% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.19%.

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.18 which suggests that it could fall by -6.75%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Resona Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Resona Holdings, Inc..

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.326, which suggesting that the stock is 132.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.337, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.345%.

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Resona Holdings, Inc. pays 27.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. pays out 33.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resona Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22B. Resona Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $494.2M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $5.3B. Notably, Resona Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.50x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resona Holdings, Inc. is 2.99x versus 2.31x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 24.45% compared to Resona Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.25%. Resona Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.65% beat Nomura Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64%.

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.58 which suggests that it could fall by -3.07%. Given that Nomura Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Resona Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Nomura Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Resona Holdings, Inc..

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.326, which suggesting that the stock is 132.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.499%.

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Nomura Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Resona Holdings, Inc. pays 27.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings, Inc. pays out 53.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resona Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Nomura Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Resona Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $494.2M is lower than Nomura Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $649.6M. Notably, Resona Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.50x while Nomura Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resona Holdings, Inc. is 2.99x versus 0.78x for Nomura Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ribbon Acquisition Corp. has a net margin of 24.45% compared to Resona Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Resona Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.65% beat Ribbon Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity of 1.9%.

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ribbon Acquisition Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Resona Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ribbon Acquisition Corp., analysts believe Resona Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Ribbon Acquisition Corp..

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.326, which suggesting that the stock is 132.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ribbon Acquisition Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Resona Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Ribbon Acquisition Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Resona Holdings, Inc. pays 27.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ribbon Acquisition Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Resona Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Resona Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Ribbon Acquisition Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Resona Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $494.2M is higher than Ribbon Acquisition Corp.'s net income of $400. Notably, Resona Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.50x while Ribbon Acquisition Corp.'s PE ratio is 17,241.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Resona Holdings, Inc. is 2.99x versus -- for Ribbon Acquisition Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.