ROYUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carlsberg AS has a net margin of 16.53% compared to Royal Unibrew AS's net margin of --. Royal Unibrew AS's return on equity of 25.01% beat Carlsberg AS's return on equity of -149.39%.

Royal Unibrew AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Carlsberg AS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Unibrew AS has higher upside potential than Carlsberg AS, analysts believe Royal Unibrew AS is more attractive than Carlsberg AS.

Royal Unibrew AS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carlsberg AS has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.397%.

Royal Unibrew AS has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carlsberg AS offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Royal Unibrew AS pays 65.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Carlsberg AS pays out -9.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Unibrew AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Unibrew AS quarterly revenues are $601.7M, which are larger than Carlsberg AS quarterly revenues of --. Royal Unibrew AS's net income of $99.5M is higher than Carlsberg AS's net income of --. Notably, Royal Unibrew AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.63x while Carlsberg AS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Unibrew AS is 1.74x versus 1.20x for Carlsberg AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Splash Beverage Group has a net margin of 16.53% compared to Royal Unibrew AS's net margin of -480.68%. Royal Unibrew AS's return on equity of 25.01% beat Splash Beverage Group's return on equity of --.

Royal Unibrew AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 177.78%. Given that Splash Beverage Group has higher upside potential than Royal Unibrew AS, analysts believe Splash Beverage Group is more attractive than Royal Unibrew AS.

Royal Unibrew AS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.43%.

Royal Unibrew AS has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Splash Beverage Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Unibrew AS pays 65.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Unibrew AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Unibrew AS quarterly revenues are $601.7M, which are larger than Splash Beverage Group quarterly revenues of $981.9K. Royal Unibrew AS's net income of $99.5M is higher than Splash Beverage Group's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Royal Unibrew AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.63x while Splash Beverage Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Unibrew AS is 1.74x versus 1.54x for Splash Beverage Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS has a net margin of 16.53% compared to Royal Unibrew AS's net margin of 12.22%. Royal Unibrew AS's return on equity of 25.01% beat Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS's return on equity of 10.7%.

Royal Unibrew AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Unibrew AS has higher upside potential than Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS, analysts believe Royal Unibrew AS is more attractive than Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS.

Royal Unibrew AS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Royal Unibrew AS has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS offers a yield of 8.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Royal Unibrew AS pays 65.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS pays out 60.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Unibrew AS quarterly revenues are $601.7M, which are larger than Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS quarterly revenues of $358.2M. Royal Unibrew AS's net income of $99.5M is higher than Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS's net income of $43.8M. Notably, Royal Unibrew AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.63x while Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS's PE ratio is 8.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Unibrew AS is 1.74x versus 0.90x for Scandinavian Tobacco Group AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fresh Vine Wine has a net margin of 16.53% compared to Royal Unibrew AS's net margin of -498.81%. Royal Unibrew AS's return on equity of 25.01% beat Fresh Vine Wine's return on equity of -697.95%.

Royal Unibrew AS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fresh Vine Wine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Unibrew AS has higher upside potential than Fresh Vine Wine, analysts believe Royal Unibrew AS is more attractive than Fresh Vine Wine.

Royal Unibrew AS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fresh Vine Wine has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Royal Unibrew AS has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fresh Vine Wine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Unibrew AS pays 65.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Fresh Vine Wine pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Unibrew AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Unibrew AS quarterly revenues are $601.7M, which are larger than Fresh Vine Wine quarterly revenues of $63.2K. Royal Unibrew AS's net income of $99.5M is higher than Fresh Vine Wine's net income of -$315.3K. Notably, Royal Unibrew AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.63x while Fresh Vine Wine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Unibrew AS is 1.74x versus 22.80x for Fresh Vine Wine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.