RELOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

White Fox Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of 12.62% compared to Relo Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. Relo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.63% beat White Fox Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Relo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand White Fox Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1066.67%. Given that White Fox Ventures, Inc. has higher upside potential than Relo Group, Inc., analysts believe White Fox Ventures, Inc. is more attractive than Relo Group, Inc..

Relo Group, Inc. has a beta of -0.091, which suggesting that the stock is 109.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison White Fox Ventures, Inc. has a beta of 14.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1303.111%.

Relo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. White Fox Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Relo Group, Inc. pays 13.25% of its earnings as a dividend. White Fox Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Relo Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Relo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $233.9M, which are larger than White Fox Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Relo Group, Inc.'s net income of $29.5M is higher than White Fox Ventures, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3K. Notably, Relo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.77x while White Fox Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Relo Group, Inc. is 1.92x versus -- for White Fox Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 12.62% compared to Relo Group, Inc.'s net margin of 9.18%. Relo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.63% beat MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.27%.

Relo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Relo Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd., analysts believe Relo Group, Inc. is more attractive than MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd..

Relo Group, Inc. has a beta of -0.091, which suggesting that the stock is 109.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.312%.

Relo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Relo Group, Inc. pays 13.25% of its earnings as a dividend. MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd. pays out 3.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Relo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $233.9M, which are smaller than MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $568.8M. Relo Group, Inc.'s net income of $29.5M is lower than MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd.'s net income of $52.2M. Notably, Relo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.77x while MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Relo Group, Inc. is 1.92x versus 1.82x for MITSUI E&S Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 12.62% compared to Relo Group, Inc.'s net margin of 16.88%. Relo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.63% beat Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.26%.

Relo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Relo Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., analysts believe Relo Group, Inc. is more attractive than Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd..

Relo Group, Inc. has a beta of -0.091, which suggesting that the stock is 109.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. has a beta of -1.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.026%.

Relo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Relo Group, Inc. pays 13.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. pays out 13.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Relo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $233.9M, which are smaller than Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $277.1M. Relo Group, Inc.'s net income of $29.5M is lower than Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.'s net income of $46.8M. Notably, Relo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.77x while Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Relo Group, Inc. is 1.92x versus 1.86x for Namura Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TANSEISHA Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 12.62% compared to Relo Group, Inc.'s net margin of 2.82%. Relo Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.63% beat TANSEISHA Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.1%.

Relo Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TANSEISHA Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Relo Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than TANSEISHA Co., Ltd., analysts believe Relo Group, Inc. is more attractive than TANSEISHA Co., Ltd..

Relo Group, Inc. has a beta of -0.091, which suggesting that the stock is 109.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TANSEISHA Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Relo Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. TANSEISHA Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Relo Group, Inc. pays 13.25% of its earnings as a dividend. TANSEISHA Co., Ltd. pays out 56.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Relo Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $233.9M, which are larger than TANSEISHA Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $158.4M. Relo Group, Inc.'s net income of $29.5M is higher than TANSEISHA Co., Ltd.'s net income of $4.5M. Notably, Relo Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.77x while TANSEISHA Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Relo Group, Inc. is 1.92x versus 0.54x for TANSEISHA Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.