Financhill
Sell
31

RBGLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$12.03
Seasonality move :
0.16%
Day range:
$11.96 - $12.14
52-week range:
$10.24 - $15.03
Dividend yield:
4.2%
P/E ratio:
22.07x
P/S ratio:
2.39x
P/B ratio:
4.06x
Volume:
354.6K
Avg. volume:
452.6K
1-year change:
-11.74%
Market cap:
$41.4B
Revenue:
$18.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.55

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
-- -- -- -- --
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
-- -- -- -- --
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
$5.8B -- -- -- $80.61
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
-- -- -- -- --
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
$20.8B -- -- -- --
UL
Unilever PLC
$16.2B -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
$12.03 -- $41.4B 22.07x $0.21 4.2% 2.39x
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
$36.24 -- $79.9B -- $0.74 8.29% 2.47x
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
$75.15 $80.61 $34.6B 19.94x $1.30 2.78% 1.68x
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
$32.28 -- $27B 8.36x $0.30 5.87% 0.68x
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
$14.05 -- $31.4B 19.49x $0.16 3.36% 0.37x
UL
Unilever PLC
$57.16 -- $141.5B 20.18x $0.48 3.27% 2.22x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
51.56% -0.515 28.41% 0.46x
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
42.6% 0.632 73.63% 0.57x
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
57.33% 0.330 36.05% 0.57x
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
61.51% -0.133 45.86% 0.33x
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
38.22% 0.898 36.34% 0.30x
UL
Unilever PLC
-- 0.069 -- 0.56x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
-- -- 9.03% 17.83% -- --
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
-- -- -13.43% -22.5% -- --
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
-- -- 8.26% 19.35% -- --
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
-- -- 17.1% 44.78% -- --
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
-- -- 6.22% 10.12% -- --
UL
Unilever PLC
-- -- 21.13% 30.02% -- --

Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns RBGLY or BTI?

    British American Tobacco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 17.83% beat British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of -22.5%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    -- -- $21.1B
    BTI
    British American Tobacco PLC
    -- -- $119.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About RBGLY or BTI?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand British American Tobacco PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.02%. Given that British American Tobacco PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe British American Tobacco PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    0 0 0
    BTI
    British American Tobacco PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is RBGLY or BTI More Risky?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.440, which suggesting that the stock is 56.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.486%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RBGLY or BTI?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. British American Tobacco PLC offers a yield of 8.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays 81.5% of its earnings as a dividend. British American Tobacco PLC pays out -35.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RBGLY or BTI?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of -- is lower than British American Tobacco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.07x while British American Tobacco PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC is 2.39x versus 2.47x for British American Tobacco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    2.39x 22.07x -- --
    BTI
    British American Tobacco PLC
    2.47x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns RBGLY or CCEP?

    Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 17.83% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's return on equity of 19.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    -- -- $21.1B
    CCEP
    Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
    -- -- $21.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About RBGLY or CCEP?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has an analysts' consensus of $80.61 which suggests that it could grow by 9.64%. Given that Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    0 0 0
    CCEP
    Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
    8 3 0
  • Is RBGLY or CCEP More Risky?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.440, which suggesting that the stock is 56.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.761%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RBGLY or CCEP?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays 81.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC pays out 50.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RBGLY or CCEP?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.07x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's PE ratio is 19.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC is 2.39x versus 1.68x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    2.39x 22.07x -- --
    CCEP
    Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
    1.68x 19.94x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns RBGLY or IMBBY?

    Imperial Brands PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 17.83% beat Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    -- -- $21.1B
    IMBBY
    Imperial Brands PLC
    -- -- $19.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About RBGLY or IMBBY?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Imperial Brands PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.33%. Given that Imperial Brands PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe Imperial Brands PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    0 0 0
    IMBBY
    Imperial Brands PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is RBGLY or IMBBY More Risky?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.440, which suggesting that the stock is 56.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.951%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RBGLY or IMBBY?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Imperial Brands PLC offers a yield of 5.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays 81.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC pays out 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RBGLY or IMBBY?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of -- is lower than Imperial Brands PLC's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.07x while Imperial Brands PLC's PE ratio is 8.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC is 2.39x versus 0.68x for Imperial Brands PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    2.39x 22.07x -- --
    IMBBY
    Imperial Brands PLC
    0.68x 8.36x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns RBGLY or TSCDY?

    Tesco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 17.83% beat Tesco PLC's return on equity of 10.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    -- -- $21.1B
    TSCDY
    Tesco PLC
    -- -- $23.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About RBGLY or TSCDY?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tesco PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.49%. Given that Tesco PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe Tesco PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    0 0 0
    TSCDY
    Tesco PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is RBGLY or TSCDY More Risky?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.440, which suggesting that the stock is 56.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesco PLC has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.663%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RBGLY or TSCDY?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Tesco PLC offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays 81.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesco PLC pays out 65.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RBGLY or TSCDY?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tesco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of -- is lower than Tesco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.07x while Tesco PLC's PE ratio is 19.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC is 2.39x versus 0.37x for Tesco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    2.39x 22.07x -- --
    TSCDY
    Tesco PLC
    0.37x 19.49x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns RBGLY or UL?

    Unilever PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 17.83% beat Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    -- -- $21.1B
    UL
    Unilever PLC
    -- -- $24.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About RBGLY or UL?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unilever PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.81%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    0 0 0
    UL
    Unilever PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is RBGLY or UL More Risky?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.440, which suggesting that the stock is 56.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.480, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.979%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RBGLY or UL?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Unilever PLC offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays 81.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC pays out 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RBGLY or UL?

    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever PLC quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of -- is lower than Unilever PLC's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.07x while Unilever PLC's PE ratio is 20.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC is 2.39x versus 2.22x for Unilever PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RBGLY
    Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
    2.39x 22.07x -- --
    UL
    Unilever PLC
    2.22x 20.18x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock