PUIGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ebro Foods SA has a net margin of -- compared to Puig Brands SA's net margin of --. Puig Brands SA's return on equity of -- beat Ebro Foods SA's return on equity of 9.01%.

Puig Brands SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ebro Foods SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puig Brands SA has higher upside potential than Ebro Foods SA, analysts believe Puig Brands SA is more attractive than Ebro Foods SA.

Puig Brands SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ebro Foods SA has a beta of 0.303, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.681%.

Puig Brands SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ebro Foods SA offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Puig Brands SA pays 38.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Ebro Foods SA pays out 52.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puig Brands SA quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Ebro Foods SA quarterly revenues of --. Puig Brands SA's net income of -- is lower than Ebro Foods SA's net income of --. Notably, Puig Brands SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ebro Foods SA's PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puig Brands SA is -- versus 0.82x for Ebro Foods SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Splash Beverage Group has a net margin of -- compared to Puig Brands SA's net margin of -480.68%. Puig Brands SA's return on equity of -- beat Splash Beverage Group's return on equity of --.

Puig Brands SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 269.46%. Given that Splash Beverage Group has higher upside potential than Puig Brands SA, analysts believe Splash Beverage Group is more attractive than Puig Brands SA.

Puig Brands SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.43%.

Puig Brands SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Splash Beverage Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puig Brands SA pays 38.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Puig Brands SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puig Brands SA quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Splash Beverage Group quarterly revenues of $981.9K. Puig Brands SA's net income of -- is lower than Splash Beverage Group's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Puig Brands SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Splash Beverage Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puig Brands SA is -- versus 1.16x for Splash Beverage Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deoleo SA has a net margin of -- compared to Puig Brands SA's net margin of --. Puig Brands SA's return on equity of -- beat Deoleo SA's return on equity of -2.64%.

Puig Brands SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Deoleo SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puig Brands SA has higher upside potential than Deoleo SA, analysts believe Puig Brands SA is more attractive than Deoleo SA.

Puig Brands SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deoleo SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Puig Brands SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deoleo SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puig Brands SA pays 38.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Deoleo SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Puig Brands SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puig Brands SA quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Deoleo SA quarterly revenues of --. Puig Brands SA's net income of -- is lower than Deoleo SA's net income of --. Notably, Puig Brands SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Deoleo SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puig Brands SA is -- versus 0.12x for Deoleo SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fresh Vine Wine has a net margin of -- compared to Puig Brands SA's net margin of -498.81%. Puig Brands SA's return on equity of -- beat Fresh Vine Wine's return on equity of -697.95%.

Puig Brands SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fresh Vine Wine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puig Brands SA has higher upside potential than Fresh Vine Wine, analysts believe Puig Brands SA is more attractive than Fresh Vine Wine.

Puig Brands SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fresh Vine Wine has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Puig Brands SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fresh Vine Wine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puig Brands SA pays 38.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Fresh Vine Wine pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Puig Brands SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puig Brands SA quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Fresh Vine Wine quarterly revenues of $63.2K. Puig Brands SA's net income of -- is lower than Fresh Vine Wine's net income of -$315.3K. Notably, Puig Brands SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fresh Vine Wine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puig Brands SA is -- versus 22.94x for Fresh Vine Wine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.