Financhill
Buy
53

PSBKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.70
Seasonality move :
3.2%
Day range:
$0.70 - $0.70
52-week range:
$0.56 - $0.70
Dividend yield:
5.22%
P/E ratio:
6.36x
P/S ratio:
0.96x
P/B ratio:
0.59x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
11.6K
1-year change:
16.02%
Market cap:
$83.6B
Revenue:
$81.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.11

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PSBKF
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
LX
Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- $7.40
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
QFIN
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
$699.3M -- 6.65% -- $34.45
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PSBKF
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
$0.70 -- $83.6B 6.36x $0.02 5.22% 0.96x
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
LX
Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.
$3.22 $7.40 $541.8M 2.30x $0.19 11.68% 0.31x
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
$6.70 -- $94.2M -- $0.00 0% 3.61x
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
$0.97 -- $15.4M -- $0.00 0% 3.10x
QFIN
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
$18.98 $34.45 $2.5B 2.77x $0.76 10.85% 0.97x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PSBKF
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
55.17% 0.377 223.57% 0.00x
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
-- 0.000 -- --
LX
Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.
28.69% -1.351 74.5% 0.41x
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
-- -1.882 -- --
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
-- 0.002 -- 0.21x
QFIN
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
22.21% -0.601 25.91% 0.74x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PSBKF
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
-- $4.1B 4.74% 9.62% 55.3% $4.1B
DXF
Dunxin Financial Holdings
-- -- -- -- -- --
LX
Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.
$351.5M $99M 11.11% 16.05% 20.57% --
NCTY
The9 Ltd.
-- -- -- -- -- --
PT
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- -- --
QFIN
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
$601.1M $243.6M 24.08% 28.77% 49.59% $351.3M

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PSBKF or DXF?

    Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 19.28% compared to Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    -- $0.03 $317.9B
    DXF
    Dunxin Financial Holdings
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PSBKF or DXF?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0 0 0
    DXF
    Dunxin Financial Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is PSBKF or DXF More Risky?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSBKF or DXF?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. pays 31.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSBKF or DXF?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net income of $3.8B is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.36x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. is 0.96x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0.96x 6.36x $19.8B $3.8B
    DXF
    Dunxin Financial Holdings
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PSBKF or LX?

    Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 19.28% compared to Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 15.23%. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    -- $0.03 $317.9B
    LX
    Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.
    73.02% $0.41 $2.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About PSBKF or LX?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $7.40 which suggests that it could grow by 129.6%. Given that Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd., analysts believe Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0 0 0
    LX
    Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.
    4 0 0
  • Is PSBKF or LX More Risky?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.751%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSBKF or LX?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 11.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. pays 31.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. pays out 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSBKF or LX?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $481.4M. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net income of $3.8B is higher than Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $73.3M. Notably, Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.36x while Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. is 0.96x versus 0.31x for Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0.96x 6.36x $19.8B $3.8B
    LX
    Lexinfintech Holdings Ltd.
    0.31x 2.30x $481.4M $73.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns PSBKF or NCTY?

    The9 Ltd. has a net margin of 19.28% compared to Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat The9 Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    -- $0.03 $317.9B
    NCTY
    The9 Ltd.
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PSBKF or NCTY?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than The9 Ltd., analysts believe Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. is more attractive than The9 Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0 0 0
    NCTY
    The9 Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is PSBKF or NCTY More Risky?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 Ltd. has a beta of 1.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.113%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSBKF or NCTY?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. The9 Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. pays 31.96% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSBKF or NCTY?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than The9 Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net income of $3.8B is higher than The9 Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.36x while The9 Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. is 0.96x versus 3.61x for The9 Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0.96x 6.36x $19.8B $3.8B
    NCTY
    The9 Ltd.
    3.61x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PSBKF or PT?

    Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 19.28% compared to Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    -- $0.03 $317.9B
    PT
    Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- -$53.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About PSBKF or PT?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0 0 0
    PT
    Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is PSBKF or PT More Risky?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.902%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSBKF or PT?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. pays 31.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSBKF or PT?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net income of $3.8B is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.36x while Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. is 0.96x versus 3.10x for Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0.96x 6.36x $19.8B $3.8B
    PT
    Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.
    3.10x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PSBKF or QFIN?

    Qfin Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 19.28% compared to Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 27.52%. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    -- $0.03 $317.9B
    QFIN
    Qfin Holdings, Inc.
    82.65% $1.51 $4.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About PSBKF or QFIN?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Qfin Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.45 which suggests that it could grow by 81.51%. Given that Qfin Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd., analysts believe Qfin Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0 0 0
    QFIN
    Qfin Holdings, Inc.
    9 1 0
  • Is PSBKF or QFIN More Risky?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qfin Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.772%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSBKF or QFIN?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Qfin Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 10.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. pays 31.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Qfin Holdings, Inc. pays out 22.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSBKF or QFIN?

    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Qfin Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $727.3M. Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s net income of $3.8B is higher than Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $200.1M. Notably, Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.36x while Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. is 0.96x versus 0.97x for Qfin Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSBKF
    Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
    0.96x 6.36x $19.8B $3.8B
    QFIN
    Qfin Holdings, Inc.
    0.97x 2.77x $727.3M $200.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4

Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.

Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.

Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4

Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock