Is JetBlue The Best Airline Stock?
Following a general trend of improvement among airline stocks, shares…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ADAG
Adagene, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.34 | -- | -- | $9.22 |
|
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -100% | -- | $4.00 |
|
CPHI
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SVA
Sinovac Biotech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZLAB
Zai Lab Ltd.
|
$138M | -$0.28 | 16.92% | -46.43% | $49.49 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
$1.93 | -- | $3.4B | 16.26x | $0.03 | 1.44% | 1.83x |
|
ADAG
Adagene, Inc.
|
$1.91 | $9.22 | $90.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 861.40x |
|
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
$0.86 | $4.00 | $17.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.50x |
|
CPHI
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.75 | -- | $5.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.41x |
|
SVA
Sinovac Biotech Ltd.
|
$6.47 | -- | $464.9M | -- | $55.00 | 0% | 1.50x |
|
ZLAB
Zai Lab Ltd.
|
$18.70 | $49.49 | $2.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.54x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
30.42% | 0.012 | 25.56% | 1.01x |
|
ADAG
Adagene, Inc.
|
26.49% | 2.508 | -- | 2.23x |
|
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
-274.41% | 0.019 | 55.28% | 0.19x |
|
CPHI
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
|
29.58% | -1.772 | 56.09% | 0.09x |
|
SVA
Sinovac Biotech Ltd.
|
3.46% | 7.067 | 12.91% | 11.22x |
|
ZLAB
Zai Lab Ltd.
|
22.4% | 0.005 | 5.85% | 2.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
$168.7M | $71.9M | 6.8% | 9.62% | 14.35% | $41.1M |
|
ADAG
Adagene, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -42.07% | -56.44% | -- | -- |
|
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
$706K | -$10.2M | -405.32% | -70405.41% | -333.14% | -- |
|
CPHI
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
|
-$257.6K | -$628.1K | -29.08% | -43.41% | -83.07% | -$277.6K |
|
SVA
Sinovac Biotech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -1.02% | -1.05% | -- | -- |
|
ZLAB
Zai Lab Ltd.
|
$69.3M | -$48.9M | -21.74% | -26.7% | -42.05% | -$44.5M |
Adagene, Inc. has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat Adagene, Inc.'s return on equity of -56.44%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
33.65% | $0.03 | $3B |
|
ADAG
Adagene, Inc.
|
-- | -- | $68.7M |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Adagene, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.22 which suggests that it could grow by 381.94%. Given that Adagene, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd., analysts believe Adagene, Inc. is more attractive than Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
ADAG
Adagene, Inc.
|
6 | 2 | 0 |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adagene, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Adagene, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Adagene, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $501.3M, which are larger than Adagene, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net income of $57.7M is higher than Adagene, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while Adagene, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. is 1.83x versus 861.40x for Adagene, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
1.83x | 16.26x | $501.3M | $57.7M |
|
ADAG
Adagene, Inc.
|
861.40x | -- | -- | -- |
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -353.92%. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s return on equity of -70405.41%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
33.65% | $0.03 | $3B |
|
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
22.96% | -$0.68 | -$6.9M |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 366.8%. Given that CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd., analysts believe CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is more attractive than Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.657%.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $501.3M, which are larger than CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net income of $57.7M is higher than CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s net income of -$10.9M. Notably, Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. is 1.83x versus 0.50x for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
1.83x | 16.26x | $501.3M | $57.7M |
|
CASI
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
0.50x | -- | $3.1M | -$10.9M |
China Pharma Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -86.16%. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat China Pharma Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -43.41%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
33.65% | $0.03 | $3B |
|
CPHI
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
|
-34.07% | -$0.17 | $12.1M |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Pharma Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Pharma Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Pharma Holdings, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
CPHI
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Pharma Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.826%.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. China Pharma Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. China Pharma Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $501.3M, which are larger than China Pharma Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $756.2K. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net income of $57.7M is higher than China Pharma Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$651.5K. Notably, Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while China Pharma Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. is 1.83x versus 1.41x for China Pharma Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
1.83x | 16.26x | $501.3M | $57.7M |
|
CPHI
China Pharma Holdings, Inc.
|
1.41x | -- | $756.2K | -$651.5K |
Sinovac Biotech Ltd. has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat Sinovac Biotech Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.05%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
33.65% | $0.03 | $3B |
|
SVA
Sinovac Biotech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | $11.8B |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinovac Biotech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sinovac Biotech Ltd., analysts believe Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Sinovac Biotech Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
SVA
Sinovac Biotech Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinovac Biotech Ltd. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.741%.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Sinovac Biotech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $55.00 per share. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinovac Biotech Ltd. pays out -328.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $501.3M, which are larger than Sinovac Biotech Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net income of $57.7M is higher than Sinovac Biotech Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while Sinovac Biotech Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. is 1.83x versus 1.50x for Sinovac Biotech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
1.83x | 16.26x | $501.3M | $57.7M |
|
SVA
Sinovac Biotech Ltd.
|
1.50x | -- | -- | -- |
Zai Lab Ltd. has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -30.98%. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.62% beat Zai Lab Ltd.'s return on equity of -26.7%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
33.65% | $0.03 | $3B |
|
ZLAB
Zai Lab Ltd.
|
59.62% | -$0.33 | $979.3M |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zai Lab Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $49.49 which suggests that it could grow by 164.64%. Given that Zai Lab Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd., analysts believe Zai Lab Ltd. is more attractive than Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
ZLAB
Zai Lab Ltd.
|
8 | 1 | 0 |
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zai Lab Ltd. has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.778%.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Zai Lab Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. pays 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Zai Lab Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $501.3M, which are larger than Zai Lab Ltd. quarterly revenues of $116.2M. Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s net income of $57.7M is higher than Zai Lab Ltd.'s net income of -$36M. Notably, Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while Zai Lab Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd. is 1.83x versus 4.54x for Zai Lab Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHBBF
Pharmaron Beijing Co., Ltd.
|
1.83x | 16.26x | $501.3M | $57.7M |
|
ZLAB
Zai Lab Ltd.
|
4.54x | -- | $116.2M | -$36M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Following a general trend of improvement among airline stocks, shares…
Following a bidding war, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) has announced its intention…
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Photronics, Inc. [PLAB] is up 45.35% over the past day.
Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [OLMA] is up 15.35% over the past day.
Telesat Corp. [TSAT] is up 3.07% over the past day.