OWUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blink Charging Co. has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe, Inc.'s net margin of -0.32%. One World Universe, Inc.'s return on equity of -47.3% beat Blink Charging Co.'s return on equity of -109.35%.

One World Universe, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blink Charging Co. has an analysts' consensus of $2.40 which suggests that it could grow by 231.81%. Given that Blink Charging Co. has higher upside potential than One World Universe, Inc., analysts believe Blink Charging Co. is more attractive than One World Universe, Inc..

One World Universe, Inc. has a beta of 4.023, which suggesting that the stock is 302.309% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging Co. has a beta of 1.889, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.919%.

One World Universe, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Blink Charging Co. quarterly revenues of $27M. One World Universe, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8K is higher than Blink Charging Co.'s net income of -$86K. Notably, One World Universe, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blink Charging Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe, Inc. is -- versus 0.70x for Blink Charging Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GTFN Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe, Inc.'s net margin of --. One World Universe, Inc.'s return on equity of -47.3% beat GTFN Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 296.42%.

One World Universe, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GTFN Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that One World Universe, Inc. has higher upside potential than GTFN Holdings, Inc., analysts believe One World Universe, Inc. is more attractive than GTFN Holdings, Inc..

One World Universe, Inc. has a beta of 4.023, which suggesting that the stock is 302.309% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GTFN Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -2.216, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 321.6%.

One World Universe, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GTFN Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GTFN Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GTFN Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. One World Universe, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8K is higher than GTFN Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$7.9K. Notably, One World Universe, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GTFN Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 188.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe, Inc. is -- versus 117.41x for GTFN Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forrester Research, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe, Inc.'s net margin of -2.26%. One World Universe, Inc.'s return on equity of -47.3% beat Forrester Research, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.8%.

One World Universe, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forrester Research, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.44%. Given that Forrester Research, Inc. has higher upside potential than One World Universe, Inc., analysts believe Forrester Research, Inc. is more attractive than One World Universe, Inc..

One World Universe, Inc. has a beta of 4.023, which suggesting that the stock is 302.309% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forrester Research, Inc. has a beta of 0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.698%.

One World Universe, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forrester Research, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forrester Research, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forrester Research, Inc. quarterly revenues of $94.3M. One World Universe, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8K is higher than Forrester Research, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, One World Universe, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forrester Research, Inc.'s PE ratio is 239.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe, Inc. is -- versus 0.34x for Forrester Research, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe, Inc.'s net margin of 29.6%. One World Universe, Inc.'s return on equity of -47.3% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.34%.

One World Universe, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.17 which suggests that it could grow by 82.7%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than One World Universe, Inc., analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than One World Universe, Inc..

One World Universe, Inc. has a beta of 4.023, which suggesting that the stock is 302.309% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

One World Universe, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $43.4M. One World Universe, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8K is lower than SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $12.8M. Notably, One World Universe, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe, Inc. is -- versus 2.58x for SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.