BLNK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GTFN Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.32% compared to Blink Charging Co.'s net margin of --. Blink Charging Co.'s return on equity of -109.35% beat GTFN Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 296.42%.

Blink Charging Co. has a consensus price target of $2.40, signalling upside risk potential of 69.01%. On the other hand GTFN Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blink Charging Co. has higher upside potential than GTFN Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Blink Charging Co. is more attractive than GTFN Holdings, Inc..

Blink Charging Co. has a beta of 1.889, which suggesting that the stock is 88.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GTFN Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -2.216, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 321.6%.

Blink Charging Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GTFN Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blink Charging Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GTFN Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blink Charging Co. quarterly revenues are $27M, which are larger than GTFN Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Blink Charging Co.'s net income of -$86K is lower than GTFN Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$7.9K. Notably, Blink Charging Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GTFN Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 155.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blink Charging Co. is 1.38x versus 96.63x for GTFN Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forrester Research, Inc. has a net margin of -0.32% compared to Blink Charging Co.'s net margin of -2.26%. Blink Charging Co.'s return on equity of -109.35% beat Forrester Research, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.8%.

Blink Charging Co. has a consensus price target of $2.40, signalling upside risk potential of 69.01%. On the other hand Forrester Research, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 75.95%. Given that Forrester Research, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blink Charging Co., analysts believe Forrester Research, Inc. is more attractive than Blink Charging Co..

Blink Charging Co. has a beta of 1.889, which suggesting that the stock is 88.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forrester Research, Inc. has a beta of 0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.698%.

Blink Charging Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forrester Research, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blink Charging Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forrester Research, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blink Charging Co. quarterly revenues are $27M, which are smaller than Forrester Research, Inc. quarterly revenues of $94.3M. Blink Charging Co.'s net income of -$86K is higher than Forrester Research, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Blink Charging Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forrester Research, Inc.'s PE ratio is 239.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blink Charging Co. is 1.38x versus 0.32x for Forrester Research, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Rock Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.32% compared to Blink Charging Co.'s net margin of -0.96%. Blink Charging Co.'s return on equity of -109.35% beat Gold Rock Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -49.69%.

Blink Charging Co. has a consensus price target of $2.40, signalling upside risk potential of 69.01%. On the other hand Gold Rock Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blink Charging Co. has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Blink Charging Co. is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings, Inc..

Blink Charging Co. has a beta of 1.889, which suggesting that the stock is 88.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Rock Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8,232.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 823172.488%.

Blink Charging Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Rock Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blink Charging Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Rock Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blink Charging Co. quarterly revenues are $27M, which are larger than Gold Rock Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $73.2K. Blink Charging Co.'s net income of -$86K is lower than Gold Rock Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$700. Notably, Blink Charging Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Rock Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blink Charging Co. is 1.38x versus 18.88x for Gold Rock Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.32% compared to Blink Charging Co.'s net margin of 29.6%. Blink Charging Co.'s return on equity of -109.35% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.34%.

Blink Charging Co. has a consensus price target of $2.40, signalling upside risk potential of 69.01%. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.17 which suggests that it could grow by 116.05%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blink Charging Co., analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Blink Charging Co..

Blink Charging Co. has a beta of 1.889, which suggesting that the stock is 88.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Blink Charging Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blink Charging Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blink Charging Co. quarterly revenues are $27M, which are smaller than SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $43.4M. Blink Charging Co.'s net income of -$86K is lower than SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $12.8M. Notably, Blink Charging Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blink Charging Co. is 1.38x versus 2.18x for SBC Medical Group Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.