OMVKY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nabors Industries Ltd. has a net margin of 0.91% compared to OMV AG's net margin of 1.17%. OMV AG's return on equity of 5.48% beat Nabors Industries Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.66%.

OMV AG has a consensus price target of $12.35, signalling downside risk potential of -32.4%. On the other hand Nabors Industries Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $71.75 which suggests that it could fall by -10.3%. Given that OMV AG has more downside risk than Nabors Industries Ltd., analysts believe Nabors Industries Ltd. is more attractive than OMV AG.

OMV AG has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nabors Industries Ltd. has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.758%.

OMV AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. Nabors Industries Ltd. offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OMV AG pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Nabors Industries Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OMV AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OMV AG quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Nabors Industries Ltd. quarterly revenues of $797.5M. OMV AG's net income of $64M is higher than Nabors Industries Ltd.'s net income of $9.3M. Notably, OMV AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.87x while Nabors Industries Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OMV AG is 0.98x versus 0.35x for Nabors Industries Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 0.91% compared to OMV AG's net margin of -0.8%. OMV AG's return on equity of 5.48% beat Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.78%.

OMV AG has a consensus price target of $12.35, signalling downside risk potential of -32.4%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could fall by -15.17%. Given that OMV AG has more downside risk than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. is more attractive than OMV AG.

OMV AG has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.564, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.595%.

OMV AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. OMV AG pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. pays out 13.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OMV AG quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. OMV AG's net income of $64M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$9.2M. Notably, OMV AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.87x while Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OMV AG is 0.98x versus 0.87x for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transocean Ltd. has a net margin of 0.91% compared to OMV AG's net margin of 2.4%. OMV AG's return on equity of 5.48% beat Transocean Ltd.'s return on equity of -31.66%.

OMV AG has a consensus price target of $12.35, signalling downside risk potential of -32.4%. On the other hand Transocean Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.64 which suggests that it could fall by -14.4%. Given that OMV AG has more downside risk than Transocean Ltd., analysts believe Transocean Ltd. is more attractive than OMV AG.

OMV AG has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transocean Ltd. has a beta of 1.372, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.195%.

OMV AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. Transocean Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OMV AG pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Transocean Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. OMV AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OMV AG quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Transocean Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1B. OMV AG's net income of $64M is higher than Transocean Ltd.'s net income of $25M. Notably, OMV AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.87x while Transocean Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OMV AG is 0.98x versus 1.59x for Transocean Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBO AG has a net margin of 0.91% compared to OMV AG's net margin of 2.04%. OMV AG's return on equity of 5.48% beat SBO AG's return on equity of 5.14%.

OMV AG has a consensus price target of $12.35, signalling downside risk potential of -32.4%. On the other hand SBO AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OMV AG has higher upside potential than SBO AG, analysts believe OMV AG is more attractive than SBO AG.

OMV AG has a beta of 0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 73.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBO AG has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.559%.

OMV AG has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.65%. SBO AG offers a yield of 6.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. OMV AG pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. SBO AG pays out 33.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OMV AG quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than SBO AG quarterly revenues of $113M. OMV AG's net income of $64M is higher than SBO AG's net income of $2.3M. Notably, OMV AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.87x while SBO AG's PE ratio is 18.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OMV AG is 0.98x versus 0.92x for SBO AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.