OFSTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of -5128% compared to Carbon Streaming Corp.'s net margin of 32.75%. Carbon Streaming Corp.'s return on equity of -37.54% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 525.96%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carbon Streaming Corp. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Carbon Streaming Corp. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a beta of -77.964, which suggesting that the stock is 7896.427% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.053%.

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. Carbon Streaming Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carbon Streaming Corp. quarterly revenues are $3K, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Carbon Streaming Corp.'s net income of $645K is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, Carbon Streaming Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carbon Streaming Corp. is 427.67x versus 2.94x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of -5128% compared to Carbon Streaming Corp.'s net margin of 43.19%. Carbon Streaming Corp.'s return on equity of -37.54% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 525.96%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 13.31%. Given that Carbon Streaming Corp. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Carbon Streaming Corp. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a beta of -77.964, which suggesting that the stock is 7896.427% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.339%.

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 13.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Carbon Streaming Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

Carbon Streaming Corp. quarterly revenues are $3K, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. Carbon Streaming Corp.'s net income of $645K is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, Carbon Streaming Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carbon Streaming Corp. is 427.67x versus 4.48x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of -5128% compared to Carbon Streaming Corp.'s net margin of 29.17%. Carbon Streaming Corp.'s return on equity of -37.54% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 525.96%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.71 which suggests that it could grow by 8.45%. Given that Carbon Streaming Corp. has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe Carbon Streaming Corp. is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a beta of -77.964, which suggesting that the stock is 7896.427% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Carbon Streaming Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Carbon Streaming Corp. quarterly revenues are $3K, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Carbon Streaming Corp.'s net income of $645K is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, Carbon Streaming Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carbon Streaming Corp. is 427.67x versus 3.63x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pineapple Financial has a net margin of -5128% compared to Carbon Streaming Corp.'s net margin of -13.04%. Carbon Streaming Corp.'s return on equity of -37.54% beat Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -232.14%.

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 525.96%. On the other hand Pineapple Financial has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5747.95%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Carbon Streaming Corp., analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Carbon Streaming Corp..

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a beta of -77.964, which suggesting that the stock is 7896.427% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Carbon Streaming Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pineapple Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carbon Streaming Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pineapple Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carbon Streaming Corp. quarterly revenues are $3K, which are smaller than Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Carbon Streaming Corp.'s net income of $645K is higher than Pineapple Financial's net income of -$595.5K. Notably, Carbon Streaming Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pineapple Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carbon Streaming Corp. is 427.67x versus 0.03x for Pineapple Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.