NOPMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.56% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.83 which suggests that it could grow by 18.46%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.77%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $122.2M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 76.50x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.06x versus 48.09x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of --. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.56% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 40.5%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.77%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $122.2M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 76.50x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.06x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net margin of --. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.56% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 137.76%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials, Inc..

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.77%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues are $122.2M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 76.50x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is 1.06x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.