NOPMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of -2.36% compared to Neo Performance Materials's net margin of 6.57%. Neo Performance Materials's return on equity of -0.53% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 10.76%.

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 48.65%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.510, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51%.

Neo Performance Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials pays -158.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 22.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Neo Performance Materials quarterly revenues are $111.3M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $9.3M. Neo Performance Materials's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Flexible Solutions International's net income of $611.9K. Notably, Neo Performance Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.50x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials is 0.50x versus 1.20x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -2.36% compared to Neo Performance Materials's net margin of -124.64%. Neo Performance Materials's return on equity of -0.53% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.21 which suggests that it could grow by 160.84%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Neo Performance Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Neo Performance Materials pays -158.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Neo Performance Materials quarterly revenues are $111.3M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Neo Performance Materials's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.50x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials is 0.50x versus 24.36x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -2.36% compared to Neo Performance Materials's net margin of --. Neo Performance Materials's return on equity of -0.53% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 234.92%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Neo Performance Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials pays -158.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Neo Performance Materials quarterly revenues are $111.3M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Neo Performance Materials's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.50x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials is 0.50x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -2.36% compared to Neo Performance Materials's net margin of --. Neo Performance Materials's return on equity of -0.53% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.46%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Neo Performance Materials, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Neo Performance Materials.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.879, which suggesting that the stock is 87.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Neo Performance Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Neo Performance Materials pays -158.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Neo Performance Materials quarterly revenues are $111.3M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Neo Performance Materials's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Neo Performance Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.50x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Neo Performance Materials is 0.50x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.