NHYDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Borregaard ASA has a net margin of -4.63% compared to Norsk Hydro ASA's net margin of -4.64%. Norsk Hydro ASA's return on equity of 7.38% beat Borregaard ASA's return on equity of 10.38%.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a consensus price target of $10.74, signalling upside risk potential of 19.56%. On the other hand Borregaard ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norsk Hydro ASA has higher upside potential than Borregaard ASA, analysts believe Norsk Hydro ASA is more attractive than Borregaard ASA.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Borregaard ASA has a beta of -0.005, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.546%.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Borregaard ASA offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Norsk Hydro ASA pays 56.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Borregaard ASA pays out 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norsk Hydro ASA quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Borregaard ASA quarterly revenues of $181.6M. Norsk Hydro ASA's net income of -$213.6M is lower than Borregaard ASA's net income of -$8.4M. Notably, Norsk Hydro ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while Borregaard ASA's PE ratio is 32.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norsk Hydro ASA is 0.88x versus 2.57x for Borregaard ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -4.63% compared to Norsk Hydro ASA's net margin of 26.44%. Norsk Hydro ASA's return on equity of 7.38% beat CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.55%.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a consensus price target of $10.74, signalling upside risk potential of 19.56%. On the other hand CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $95.68 which suggests that it could fall by -2.24%. Given that Norsk Hydro ASA has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Norsk Hydro ASA is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings, Inc..

Norsk Hydro ASA has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CF Industries Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.65%.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. CF Industries Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Norsk Hydro ASA pays 56.57% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings, Inc. pays out 22.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norsk Hydro ASA quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than CF Industries Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Norsk Hydro ASA's net income of -$213.6M is lower than CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $495M. Notably, Norsk Hydro ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norsk Hydro ASA is 0.88x versus 2.23x for CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Elkem ASA has a net margin of -4.63% compared to Norsk Hydro ASA's net margin of 1.72%. Norsk Hydro ASA's return on equity of 7.38% beat Elkem ASA's return on equity of 1.57%.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a consensus price target of $10.74, signalling upside risk potential of 19.56%. On the other hand Elkem ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norsk Hydro ASA has higher upside potential than Elkem ASA, analysts believe Norsk Hydro ASA is more attractive than Elkem ASA.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elkem ASA has a beta of -0.212, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.191%.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Elkem ASA offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Norsk Hydro ASA pays 56.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Elkem ASA pays out 38.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norsk Hydro ASA quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Elkem ASA quarterly revenues of $392.2M. Norsk Hydro ASA's net income of -$213.6M is lower than Elkem ASA's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Norsk Hydro ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while Elkem ASA's PE ratio is 21.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norsk Hydro ASA is 0.88x versus 1.23x for Elkem ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yara International ASA has a net margin of -4.63% compared to Norsk Hydro ASA's net margin of 7.79%. Norsk Hydro ASA's return on equity of 7.38% beat Yara International ASA's return on equity of 9.6%.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a consensus price target of $10.74, signalling upside risk potential of 19.56%. On the other hand Yara International ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norsk Hydro ASA has higher upside potential than Yara International ASA, analysts believe Norsk Hydro ASA is more attractive than Yara International ASA.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yara International ASA has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.06%.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Yara International ASA offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Norsk Hydro ASA pays 56.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Yara International ASA pays out 671.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Norsk Hydro ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Yara International ASA's is not.

Norsk Hydro ASA quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Yara International ASA quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Norsk Hydro ASA's net income of -$213.6M is lower than Yara International ASA's net income of $319.8M. Notably, Norsk Hydro ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while Yara International ASA's PE ratio is 16.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norsk Hydro ASA is 0.88x versus 0.83x for Yara International ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.